Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Washington DC, USA.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012 Oct;66 Suppl 2:ii16-25. doi: 10.1136/jech-2012-201081.
Debates have raged in development for decades about the appropriateness of participatory approaches and the degree to which they can be managed, scaled and measured. The Avahan programme confronted these issues over the last 7 years and concludes that it is advantageous to manage scaled community mobilisation processes so that participation evolves and programming on the ground is shaped by what is learnt through implementation. The donor (Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation) and its partners determined a standard set of programme activities that were implemented programme-wide but evolved with input from communities on the ground. Difficulties faced in monitoring and measurement in Avahan may be characteristic of similar efforts to measure community mobilisation in a scaled programme, and ultimately these challenges informed methods that were useful. The approach the programme undertook for learning and changing, the activities it built into the HIV prevention programme, and its logic model and measurement tools, may be relevant in other public health settings seeking to integrate community mobilisation.
关于参与式方法的适当性及其可管理性、可扩展性和可衡量性,数十年来一直在发展领域引发激烈争论。阿伐汉项目在过去 7 年中直面这些问题,并得出结论,管理规模化的社区动员过程是有利的,这样参与度会提高,实地的规划也会受到实施过程中学到的知识的影响。捐赠方(比尔及梅林达·盖茨基金会及其合作伙伴)确定了一套标准的方案活动,在全项目范围内实施,但根据实地社区的反馈进行了调整。在阿伐汉项目中,监测和衡量工作面临的困难可能是类似的大规模方案中衡量社区动员工作的特征,最终这些挑战为有用的方法提供了信息。该项目采用的学习和改变方法、纳入艾滋病毒预防方案的活动、以及其逻辑模型和衡量工具,可能与其他寻求整合社区动员的公共卫生环境相关。