Suppr超能文献

评估和提高新生儿筛查经济评价方法学质量的具体指南。

Specific guidelines for assessing and improving the methodological quality of economic evaluations of newborn screening.

机构信息

Institute of Health Economics and Health Care Management, Munich School of Management, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Sep 4;12:300. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-300.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Economic evaluation of newborn screening poses specific methodological challenges. Amongst others, these challenges refer to the use of quality adjusted life years (QALYs) in newborns, and which costs and outcomes need to be considered in a full evaluation of newborn screening programmes. Because of the increasing scale and scope of such programmes, a better understanding of the methods of high-quality economic evaluations may be crucial for both producers/authors and consumers/reviewers of newborn screening-related economic evaluations. The aim of this study was therefore to develop specific guidelines designed to assess and improve the methodological quality of economic evaluations in newborn screening.

METHODS

To develop the guidelines, existing guidelines for assessing the quality of economic evaluations were identified through a literature search, and were reviewed and consolidated using a deductive iterative approach. In a subsequent test phase, these guidelines were applied to various economic evaluations which acted as case studies.

RESULTS

The guidelines for assessing and improving the methodological quality of economic evaluations in newborn screening are organized into 11 categories: "bibliographic details", "study question and design", "modelling", "health outcomes", "costs", "discounting", "presentation of results", "sensitivity analyses", "discussion", "conclusions", and "commentary".

CONCLUSIONS

The application of the guidelines highlights important issues regarding newborn screening-related economic evaluations, and underscores the need for such issues to be afforded greater consideration in future economic evaluations. The variety in methodological quality detected by this study reveals the need for specific guidelines on the appropriate methods for conducting sound economic evaluations in newborn screening.

摘要

背景

新生儿筛查的经济评估带来了特定的方法学挑战。其中包括在新生儿中使用质量调整生命年(QALYs),以及在全面评估新生儿筛查计划时需要考虑哪些成本和结果。由于这些计划的规模和范围不断扩大,对于新生儿筛查相关经济评估的生产者/作者和消费者/审查者来说,更好地理解高质量经济评估方法可能至关重要。因此,本研究的目的是制定专门的指南,旨在评估和提高新生儿筛查中经济评估的方法学质量。

方法

为了制定指南,通过文献检索确定了评估经济评估质量的现有指南,并使用演绎迭代方法对其进行了审查和整合。在随后的测试阶段,将这些指南应用于各种作为案例研究的经济评估中。

结果

新生儿筛查中经济评估方法学质量评估和提高指南分为 11 类:“文献详情”、“研究问题和设计”、“建模”、“健康结果”、“成本”、“贴现”、“结果呈现”、“敏感性分析”、“讨论”、“结论”和“评论”。

结论

指南的应用突出了与新生儿筛查相关的经济评估中的重要问题,并强调需要在未来的经济评估中更加关注这些问题。本研究检测到的方法学质量的多样性表明,需要针对新生儿筛查中进行合理经济评估的适当方法制定具体指南。

相似文献

2
A primer on economic evaluations related to expansion of newborn screening for genetic and metabolic disorders.
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2006 Nov-Dec;35(6):692-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2006.00098.x.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Genetic screening by DNA technology: a systematic review of health economic evidence.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2006 Summer;22(3):327-37. doi: 10.1017/s0266462306051221.
8
Cost-Effectiveness Methods and Newborn Screening Assessment.
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;1031:267-281. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-67144-4_16.
10
[Expert consensus on the follow-up of newborn screening for neonatal genetic and metabolic diseases].
Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi. 2020 Apr 10;37(4):367-372. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1003-9406.2020.04.002.

引用本文的文献

2
Policy-making and implementation for newborn bloodspot screening in Europe: a comparison between EURORDIS principles and UK practice.
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2023 Aug 10;33:100714. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100714. eCollection 2023 Oct.
6
Bioaerosol impact on crop health over India due to emerging fungal diseases (EFDs): an important missing link.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Apr;27(11):12802-12829. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08059-x. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
7
Iron deficiency screening for children at 18 months: a cost-utility analysis.
CMAJ Open. 2019 Dec 3;7(4):E689-E698. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20190084. Print 2019 Oct-Dec.
8
Economic Evaluations of Childhood Hearing Loss Screening Programmes: A Systematic Review and Critique.
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2019 Jun;17(3):331-357. doi: 10.1007/s40258-018-00456-1.
9
Economic impact of screening for X-linked Adrenoleukodystrophy within a newborn blood spot screening programme.
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2018 Oct 11;13(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s13023-018-0921-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Decision analysis, economic evaluation, and newborn screening: challenges and opportunities.
Genet Med. 2013;14(8):703-712. doi: 10.1038/gim.2012.24. Epub 2012 Apr 5.
2
Application of classic utilities to published pediatric cost-utility studies.
Acad Pediatr. 2012 May-Jun;12(3):219-28. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2011.09.003. Epub 2011 Nov 10.
3
Health economic analysis of screening.
GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;7:Doc01. Epub 2010 Oct 7.
4
Challenges in health state valuation in paediatric economic evaluation: are QALYs contraindicated?
Pharmacoeconomics. 2011 Aug;29(8):641-52. doi: 10.2165/11591570-000000000-00000.
5
Screening of the hearing of newborns - Update.
GMS Health Technol Assess. 2006 Nov 27;2:Doc20.
6
Standardizing the inclusion of indirect medical costs in economic evaluations.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2011 Mar;29(3):175-87. doi: 10.2165/11586130-000000000-00000.
7
Towards a social discount rate for the economic evaluation of health technologies in Germany: an exploratory analysis.
Eur J Health Econ. 2012 Apr;13(2):127-44. doi: 10.1007/s10198-010-0292-9. Epub 2010 Dec 19.
8
Discounting and decision making in the economic evaluation of health-care technologies.
Health Econ. 2011 Jan;20(1):2-15. doi: 10.1002/hec.1612. Epub 2010 May 12.
9
QALY weights for neurosensory impairments in pediatric economic evaluations: case studies and a critique.
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2010 Jun;10(3):293-308. doi: 10.1586/erp.10.24.
10
Development of the EQ-5D-Y: a child-friendly version of the EQ-5D.
Qual Life Res. 2010 Aug;19(6):875-86. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9648-y. Epub 2010 Apr 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验