• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过DNA技术进行基因筛查:健康经济学证据的系统综述

Genetic screening by DNA technology: a systematic review of health economic evidence.

作者信息

Rogowski Wolf

机构信息

Institute of Health Economics and Health Care Management, GSF-National Research Center for Environment and Health, Nurenberg, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2006 Summer;22(3):327-37. doi: 10.1017/s0266462306051221.

DOI:10.1017/s0266462306051221
PMID:16984061
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The Human Genome Project has led to a multitude of new potential screening targets on the level of human DNA. The aim of this systematic review is to critically summarize the evidence from health economic evaluations of genetic screening in the literature.

METHODS

Based on an extensive explorative search, an appropriate algorithm for a systematic database search was developed. Twenty-one health economic evaluations were identified and appraised using published quality criteria.

RESULTS

Genetic screening for eight conditions has been found to be investigated by health economic evaluation: hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) colorectal cancer, hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma (HNPCC), retinoblastoma, familial hypercholesterolemia, hereditary hemochromatosis, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, and cystic fibrosis. Results range from dominated to cost-saving. Population-wide genetic screening may be considered cost-effective with limited quality of evidence only for three conditions. The methodology of the studies was of varying quality. Cost-effectiveness was primarily influenced by mutation prevalence, genetic test costs, mortality risk, effectiveness of treatment, age at screening, and discount rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Health economic evidence on genetic screening is limited: Only few conditions have properly been evaluated. Based on the existing evidence, healthcare decision makers should consider the introduction of selective genetic screening for FAP and HNPCC. As genetic test costs are declining, the existing evaluations may warrant updating. Especially in the case of hereditary hemochromatosis, genetic population screening may be about to turn from a dominated to a cost-effective or even cost-saving intervention.

摘要

目标

人类基因组计划已在人类DNA层面带来了众多新的潜在筛查靶点。本系统评价的目的是严格总结文献中基因筛查健康经济评估的证据。

方法

在广泛探索性检索的基础上,开发了一种适用于系统数据库检索的算法。使用已发表的质量标准对21项健康经济评估进行了识别和评估。

结果

已发现健康经济评估对8种疾病进行了基因筛查研究:遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌、家族性腺瘤性息肉病(FAP)结直肠癌、遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌(HNPCC)、视网膜母细胞瘤、家族性高胆固醇血症、遗传性血色素沉着症、胰岛素依赖型糖尿病和囊性纤维化。结果从劣势到节省成本不等。仅在三种疾病中,基于有限的证据质量,全人群基因筛查可能被认为具有成本效益。研究方法的质量各不相同。成本效益主要受突变患病率、基因检测成本、死亡风险、治疗效果、筛查年龄和贴现率的影响。

结论

基因筛查的健康经济证据有限:只有少数疾病得到了恰当评估。基于现有证据,医疗保健决策者应考虑引入针对FAP和HNPCC的选择性基因筛查。随着基因检测成本的下降,现有评估可能需要更新。特别是在遗传性血色素沉着症的情况下,基因人群筛查可能即将从一种劣势干预转变为具有成本效益甚至节省成本的干预。

相似文献

1
Genetic screening by DNA technology: a systematic review of health economic evidence.通过DNA技术进行基因筛查:健康经济学证据的系统综述
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2006 Summer;22(3):327-37. doi: 10.1017/s0266462306051221.
2
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
3
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
4
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
5
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
6
Comparison of the effectiveness of inhaler devices in asthma and chronic obstructive airways disease: a systematic review of the literature.吸入装置在哮喘和慢性阻塞性气道疾病中的有效性比较:文献系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(26):1-149. doi: 10.3310/hta5260.
7
A systematic review and economic evaluation of epoetin alpha, epoetin beta and darbepoetin alpha in anaemia associated with cancer, especially that attributable to cancer treatment.促红细胞生成素α、促红细胞生成素β和达比加群酯治疗癌症相关性贫血(尤其是癌症治疗所致贫血)的系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Apr;11(13):1-202, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta11130.
8
Surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus: exploring the uncertainty through systematic review, expert workshop and economic modelling.巴雷特食管的监测:通过系统评价、专家研讨会和经济模型探索不确定性
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Mar;10(8):1-142, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10080.
9
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌的临床疗效与成本效益:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Nov;10(45):1-141, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10450.
10
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapy for Gaucher's disease: a systematic review.戈谢病酶替代疗法的临床疗效和成本效益:一项系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Jul;10(24):iii-iv, ix-136. doi: 10.3310/hta10240.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers and Facilitators for Population Genetic Screening in Healthy Populations: A Systematic Review.健康人群中群体遗传筛查的障碍与促进因素:一项系统综述
Front Genet. 2022 Jul 4;13:865384. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.865384. eCollection 2022.
2
Precision Medicine: From Science To Value.精准医学:从科学到价值。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 May;37(5):694-701. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1624.
3
Which BRCA genetic testing programs are ready for implementation in health care? A systematic review of economic evaluations.哪些BRCA基因检测项目已准备好在医疗保健中实施?一项经济评估的系统综述。
Genet Med. 2016 Dec;18(12):1171-1180. doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.29. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
4
Assessing the Costs and Cost-Effectiveness of Genomic Sequencing.评估基因组测序的成本及成本效益
J Pers Med. 2015 Dec 10;5(4):470-86. doi: 10.3390/jpm5040470.
5
Valuations of genetic test information for treatable conditions: the case of colorectal cancer screening.可治疗疾病的基因检测信息评估:以结直肠癌筛查为例。
Value Health. 2014 Dec;17(8):838-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.09.001. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
6
Economics of stratified medicine in rheumatoid arthritis.分层医学在类风湿关节炎中的经济学。
Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2014 Dec;16(12):468. doi: 10.1007/s11926-014-0468-x.
7
Concepts of 'personalization' in personalized medicine: implications for economic evaluation.个性化医疗中的“个性化”概念:对经济评估的影响
Pharmacoeconomics. 2015 Jan;33(1):49-59. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0211-5.
8
Points to consider for prioritizing clinical genetic testing services: a European consensus process oriented at accountability for reasonableness.临床基因检测服务优先级的考量要点:以合理问责为导向的欧洲共识流程
Eur J Hum Genet. 2015 Jun;23(6):729-35. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.190. Epub 2014 Sep 24.
9
Is individualized medicine more cost-effective? A systematic review.个性化医疗是否更具成本效益?一项系统评价。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2014 May;32(5):443-55. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0143-0.
10
Issues surrounding the health economic evaluation of genomic technologies.基因组技术健康经济评估相关问题。
Pharmacogenomics. 2013 Nov;14(15):1833-47. doi: 10.2217/pgs.13.183.