Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, United States.
Forensic Sci Int. 2013 Feb 10;225(1-3):20-6. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.08.006. Epub 2012 Sep 2.
Although 3D CT imaging data are available on survivors of accidental blunt trauma, little similar data has been collected and classified on major injuries in victims of fatal injuries. This study compared the sensitivity of post mortem computed tomography (PMCT) with that of conventional autopsy for major trauma findings classified according to the trauma Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS). Whole-body 3D PMCT imaging data and full autopsy findings were analyzed on 21 victims of accidental blunt force trauma death. All major injuries were classified on the AIS scale with ratings from 3 (serious) to 6 (unsurvivable). Agreement between sensitivity of autopsy and PMCT for major injuries was determined. A total of 195 major injuries were detected (mean per fatality, 9.3; range, 1-14). Skeletal injuries by AIS grade included 37 grade 3, 45 grade 4, 12 grade 5, and 2 grade 6 major findings. Soft tissue injuries included 10 grade 3, 68 grade 4, 16 grade 5, and 5 grade 6 major findings. Of these, PMCT detected 165 (88 skeletal, 77 soft tissue), and autopsy detected 127 (59 skeletal, 68 soft tissue). PMCT agreed with autopsy in 86% and 76% of skeletal and soft tissue injuries, respectively. PMCT detected an additional 37 skeletal and 31 soft tissue injuries that were not identified at autopsy. Autopsy detected 8 skeletal and 22 soft tissue injuries that were not detected by PMCT. PMCT was more sensitive for skeletal (P=0.05) and head and neck region injury (P=0.043) detection. PMCT showed a trend for greater sensitivity than autopsy, but this did not reach statistical significance (P=0.083). 3D PMCT detected significantly more skeletal injuries than autopsy and a similar number of soft tissue injuries to autopsy and promises to be a sensitive tool for detection and classification of skeletal injuries in fatal blunt force accidental trauma. Use of the AIS scale allows standardized categorization and quantification of injuries that contribute to death in such cases and allows more objective comparison between autopsy and PMCT.
尽管有关于意外钝性创伤幸存者的 3D CT 成像数据,但对于致命创伤受害者的主要损伤,很少有类似的数据被收集和分类。本研究比较了死后计算机断层扫描 (PMCT) 的敏感性与传统尸体解剖对根据创伤简明损伤分级 (AIS) 分类的主要创伤发现的敏感性。对 21 例意外钝性创伤死亡患者的全身 3D PMCT 成像数据和全尸解剖结果进行了分析。所有主要损伤均按 AIS 分级进行分类,评分为 3(严重)至 6(无法存活)。确定了尸检和 PMCT 对主要损伤的敏感性之间的一致性。共检测到 195 处主要损伤(平均每例死亡 9.3 处;范围 1-14 处)。AIS 分级的骨骼损伤包括 37 级 3、45 级 4、12 级 5 和 2 级 6 主要发现。软组织损伤包括 10 级 3、68 级 4、16 级 5 和 5 级 6 主要发现。其中,PMCT 检测到 165 处(88 处骨骼,77 处软组织),尸检检测到 127 处(59 处骨骼,68 处软组织)。PMCT 在骨骼和软组织损伤中的分别与尸检结果一致 86%和 76%。PMCT 还检测到尸检未发现的 37 处骨骼和 31 处软组织损伤。尸检检测到 PMCT 未检测到的 8 处骨骼和 22 处软组织损伤。PMCT 对骨骼(P=0.05)和头颈部损伤(P=0.043)的检测更敏感。PMCT 显示出比尸检更高的敏感性趋势,但这并未达到统计学意义(P=0.083)。3D PMCT 检测到的骨骼损伤明显多于尸检,与尸检检测到的软组织损伤数量相似,有望成为检测和分类致命钝性意外创伤中骨骼损伤的敏感工具。使用 AIS 分级允许对导致此类病例死亡的损伤进行标准化分类和量化,并允许更客观地比较尸检和 PMCT。