Suppr超能文献

非增强肺部计算机断层扫描在确定死因方面的准确性。

Accuracy of non-contrast PMCT for determining cause of death.

作者信息

Ampanozi Garyfalia, Thali Yannick A, Schweitzer Wolf, Hatch Gary M, Ebert Lars C, Thali Michael J, Ruder Thomas D

机构信息

Institute of Forensic Medicine, Department of Forensic Medicine and Imaging, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190/52, CH-8057, Zurich, Switzerland.

Institute of Radiology, Cantonal Hospital Lucerne, CH-6000, Lucerne, Switzerland.

出版信息

Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2017 Sep;13(3):284-292. doi: 10.1007/s12024-017-9878-1. Epub 2017 Jun 15.

Abstract

The aim of this study was (1) to compare levels of accuracy regarding the categorization of causes of death between non-contrast post-mortem computed tomography (PMCT) and the final forensic report as well as between autopsy and the final forensic report, and (2) to assess levels of confidence regarding the categorization of causes of death after non-contrast PMCT and after autopsy. This prospective study was conducted over a 5 month period during which 221 cases were admitted to our institute for forensic investigations. Whole-body PMCT and forensic autopsy were performed in every case. Of these, 101 cases were included in the final study population. Inclusion criteria were: (1) age > 18 years, (2) presence of at least one of the two principal investigators at the time of admission. One radiologist and one forensic pathologist independently read all PMCT datasets using a report template. Cause of death category and confidence levels were determined by consensus. Forensic autopsy was performed by two forensic pathologists; both unblinded to imaging results. Both post-imaging and post-autopsy cause of death categorization were compared against the final cause of death, as stated in the forensic expert report, which included findings from histology and/or toxicology. Accuracy of post-imaging cause of death categorization in reference to the final cause of death category was substantial (82%, 83/101 cases, Kappa 0.752). Accuracy of post-autopsy cause of death categorization in reference to the final cause of death category was near perfect (89%, 90/101 cases, Kappa 0.852). Post-imaging sensitivity and specificity regarding the categorization of causes of death were 82% and 97%, respectively. Post-autopsy sensitivity and specificity regarding the categorization of causes of death were 89% and 98%, respectively. There was a high consistency between the accuracy of post-imaging cause of death categorization and post-imaging levels of confidence. There was less consistency between accuracy of post-autopsy cause of death categorization and post-autopsy levels of confidence. In this study categorization of causes of death based on non-contrast enhanced PMCT alone, and on PMCT and macroscopic autopsy together, proved to be consistent with the final cause of death-category as determined based on all available information including PMCT, autopsy, and (if available) histology and/or toxicology in more than 82% and 89% of all cases, respectively. There was higher consistency between levels of confidence and accuracy of causes of death categorization was higher post-imaging than post-autopsy. These results underline the fact that the diagnostic potential of PMCT goes beyond the assessment of trauma cases.

摘要

本研究的目的是

(1)比较非增强尸检计算机断层扫描(PMCT)与最终法医报告之间以及尸检与最终法医报告之间在死因分类方面的准确性水平;(2)评估非增强PMCT后和尸检后在死因分类方面的置信度水平。这项前瞻性研究在5个月的时间内进行,在此期间,有221例案件被送往我们研究所进行法医调查。对每个病例均进行了全身PMCT和法医尸检。其中,101例被纳入最终研究人群。纳入标准为:(1)年龄>18岁;(2)入院时至少有两名主要研究者之一在场。一名放射科医生和一名法医病理学家使用报告模板独立阅读所有PMCT数据集。死因类别和置信度水平通过共识确定。法医尸检由两名法医病理学家进行;两人均未对影像结果进行盲法处理。将影像后和尸检后的死因分类与法医专家报告中所述的最终死因进行比较,法医专家报告包括组织学和/或毒理学的检查结果。相对于最终死因类别,影像后死因分类的准确性较高(82%,83/101例,Kappa值为0.752)。相对于最终死因类别,尸检后死因分类的准确性近乎完美(89%,90/101例,Kappa值为0.852)。影像后在死因分类方面的敏感性和特异性分别为82%和97%。尸检后在死因分类方面的敏感性和特异性分别为89%和98%。影像后死因分类的准确性与影像后置信度水平之间具有高度一致性。尸检后死因分类的准确性与尸检后置信度水平之间的一致性较低。在本研究中,仅基于非增强PMCT以及基于PMCT和大体尸检对死因进行分类,分别在超过82%和89%的所有病例中被证明与基于包括PMCT、尸检以及(如有)组织学和/或毒理学在内的所有可用信息所确定的最终死因类别一致。影像后在死因分类的置信度水平与准确性之间的一致性高于尸检后。这些结果强调了PMCT的诊断潜力超出了对创伤病例评估的这一事实。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验