• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人们恋爱频率和恋爱时间的预测因素。

Predictors of how often and when people fall in love.

作者信息

Galperin Andrew, Haselton Martie

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, USA.

出版信息

Evol Psychol. 2010 Jan 19;8(1):5-28. doi: 10.1177/147470491000800102.

DOI:10.1177/147470491000800102
PMID:22947775
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10481035/
Abstract

A leading theory of romantic love is that it functions to make one feel committed to one's beloved, as well as to signal this commitment to the beloved (Frank, 1988). Because women tend to be skeptical of men's commitment, this view entails that men may have evolved to fall in love first, in order to show their commitment to women. Using a sample of online participants of a broad range of ages, this study tested this sex difference and several related individual difference hypotheses concerning the ease of falling in love. There was mixed evidence for sex differences: only some measures indicated that men are generally more love-prone than are women. We also found that men were more prone to falling in love if they tended to overestimate women's sexual interest and highly valued physical attractiveness in potential partners. Women were more prone to falling in love if they had a stronger sex drive. These results provide modest support for the existence of sex differences in falling in love, as well as initial evidence for links between several individual difference variables and the propensity to fall in love.

摘要

浪漫爱情的一个主流理论认为,它的作用是让一个人对自己的爱人感到忠诚,并向爱人表明这种忠诚(弗兰克,1988)。由于女性往往对男性的忠诚持怀疑态度,这种观点意味着男性可能已经进化到先坠入爱河,以便向女性表明他们的忠诚。本研究以广泛年龄段的在线参与者为样本,测试了这种性别差异以及几个与坠入爱河的难易程度相关的个体差异假设。关于性别差异的证据不一:只有一些测量表明,男性通常比女性更容易坠入爱河。我们还发现,如果男性倾向于高估女性的性兴趣,并且高度重视潜在伴侣的外貌吸引力,那么他们就更容易坠入爱河。如果女性有较强的性欲,她们就更容易坠入爱河。这些结果为坠入爱河时存在性别差异提供了一定支持,也为几个个体差异变量与坠入爱河倾向之间的联系提供了初步证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7861/10481035/a10ccf2dcfec/10.1177_147470491000800102-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7861/10481035/bfd411b95781/10.1177_147470491000800102-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7861/10481035/cc4046adb87c/10.1177_147470491000800102-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7861/10481035/3e83a1fb1e4c/10.1177_147470491000800102-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7861/10481035/beae9a3e8b29/10.1177_147470491000800102-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7861/10481035/1a7b7ce4f865/10.1177_147470491000800102-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7861/10481035/a10ccf2dcfec/10.1177_147470491000800102-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7861/10481035/bfd411b95781/10.1177_147470491000800102-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7861/10481035/cc4046adb87c/10.1177_147470491000800102-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7861/10481035/3e83a1fb1e4c/10.1177_147470491000800102-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7861/10481035/beae9a3e8b29/10.1177_147470491000800102-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7861/10481035/1a7b7ce4f865/10.1177_147470491000800102-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7861/10481035/a10ccf2dcfec/10.1177_147470491000800102-fig6.jpg

相似文献

1
Predictors of how often and when people fall in love.人们恋爱频率和恋爱时间的预测因素。
Evol Psychol. 2010 Jan 19;8(1):5-28. doi: 10.1177/147470491000800102.
2
Romantic Love and Sexual Frequency: Challenging Beliefs.浪漫爱情与性行为频率:挑战固有观念。
J Sex Marital Ther. 2024;50(7):894-905. doi: 10.1080/0092623X.2024.2394670. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
3
Sexual satisfaction in premarital relationships: associations with satisfaction, love, commitment, and stability.婚前关系中的性满意度:与满意度、爱情、承诺和稳定性的关联。
J Sex Res. 2002 Aug;39(3):190-6. doi: 10.1080/00224490209552141.
4
Romantic love modulates women's identification of men's body odors.浪漫爱情会调节女性对男性体味的识别。
Horm Behav. 2009 Feb;55(2):280-4. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2008.11.009. Epub 2008 Dec 11.
5
Sex, love and gender norms: sexual life and experience of a group of young people in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.性、爱与性别规范:越南胡志明市一群年轻人的性生活与经历
Sex Health. 2007 Mar;4(1):63-9. doi: 10.1071/sh06023.
6
Let's get serious: communicating commitment in romantic relationships.让我们认真对待:在恋爱关系中沟通承诺。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Jun;100(6):1079-94. doi: 10.1037/a0022412.
7
Women and men in love: who really feels it and says it first?恋爱中的男人和女人:谁先感受到并说出爱意?
J Soc Psychol. 2011 Nov-Dec;151(6):727-36. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2010.522626.
8
Minor-Attracted Men's Lived Experiences of Romantic Attraction.恋童癖者的浪漫吸引力的生活体验。
J Sex Marital Ther. 2024;50(7):811-824. doi: 10.1080/0092623X.2024.2385909. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
9
The misperception of sexual interest.性趣的误解。
Psychol Sci. 2012 Feb;23(2):146-51. doi: 10.1177/0956797611424162. Epub 2012 Jan 18.
10
Emotional and sexual infidelity offline and in cyberspace.线下及网络空间中的情感不忠与性不忠。
J Marital Fam Ther. 2008 Oct;34(4):461-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2008.00088.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Sex differences in romantic love: an evolutionary perspective.浪漫爱情中的性别差异:进化视角
Biol Sex Differ. 2025 Feb 24;16(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s13293-025-00698-4.
2
Women's Estrus and Extended Sexuality: Reflections on Empirical Patterns and Fundamental Theoretical Issues.女性的发情期与延长的性活动:关于实证模式和基本理论问题的思考
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 20;13:900737. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.900737. eCollection 2022.
3
Chocolate Consumption and Sex-Interest.巧克力消费与性趣。

本文引用的文献

1
Arbitrary social norms influence sex differences in romantic selectivity.任意的社会规范影响浪漫选择性的性别差异。
Psychol Sci. 2009 Oct;20(10):1290-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02439.x. Epub 2009 Sep 14.
2
Romantic love and sexual desire in close relationships.亲密关系中的浪漫爱情与性欲
Emotion. 2006 May;6(2):163-79. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.6.2.163.
3
Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: what, whether, and why.短期伴侣偏好中的性别异同:是什么、是否存在以及为何如此。
Cureus. 2021 Feb 12;13(2):e13310. doi: 10.7759/cureus.13310.
4
Extradyadic Behaviors and Gender: How Do They Relate With Sexual Desire, Relationship Quality, and Attractiveness.婚外行为与性别:它们如何与性欲、关系质量和吸引力相关联。
Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 3;10:2554. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02554. eCollection 2019.
5
Falling in love is associated with immune system gene regulation.坠入爱河与免疫系统基因调控有关。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2019 Feb;100:120-126. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2018.09.043. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Mar;90(3):468-89. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.468.
4
The paranoid optimist: an integrative evolutionary model of cognitive biases.偏执的乐观主义者:认知偏差的综合进化模型
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2006;10(1):47-66. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr1001_3.
5
Functional projection: how fundamental social motives can bias interpersonal perception.功能投射:基本社会动机如何影响人际认知偏差
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Jan;88(1):63-78. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.63.
6
Sex, lies, and strategic interference: the psychology of deception between the sexes.性别、谎言与策略性干扰:两性之间的欺骗心理。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2005 Jan;31(1):3-23. doi: 10.1177/0146167204271303.
7
How are sociosexuality, sex drive, and lifetime number of sexual partners related?社会性取向、性驱力和性伴侣的终身数量之间是如何关联的?
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2004 Oct;30(10):1255-66. doi: 10.1177/0146167204264754.
8
What does sexual orientation orient? A biobehavioral model distinguishing romantic love and sexual desire.性取向指向什么?一种区分浪漫爱情和性欲的生物行为模型。
Psychol Rev. 2003 Jan;110(1):173-92. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.110.1.173.
9
Love and the commitment problem in romantic relations and friendship.浪漫关系和友谊中的爱情与承诺问题。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Aug;81(2):247-62. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.81.2.247.
10
The evolution of human mating: trade-offs and strategic pluralism.人类交配的演变:权衡与策略多元化。
Behav Brain Sci. 2000 Aug;23(4):573-87; discussion 587-644. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x0000337x.