Davis James S, Allan Bassan J, Sobowale Olu, Ivascu Felicia, Orion Kristine, Schulman Carl I
University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.
South Med J. 2012 Sep;105(9):447-51. doi: 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e318261f6f4.
Undertriage is common in patients 55 years and older and is even worse for those 65 and older. In 1999, the Florida legislature implemented a statewide trauma system, including a new Florida trauma triage algorithm (FTTA). This study examines how the new system affected prehospital triage in younger versus older patients.
A retrospective review of appropriate triage was conducted at a regional level 2 trauma center during a 1-year period. Patients were considered to have major trauma if they were FTTA positive or had an Injury Severity Score (ISS) of ≥ 16. An internal trauma review panel examined hospital discharge data to assess triage accuracy. Odds ratios (ORs) and confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.
A total of 49% of nontrauma patients 15 to 54 years old were seen at the trauma center compared with 83% of FTTA positive and 86% of patients with an ISS ≥ 16 (OR 2.88, 95% CI 2.44-3.41). For those with an ISS ≥ 16, the OR was 6.53 (95% CI 4.07-10.47). For patients 55 years and older, 52% of nontrauma patients were triaged to the trauma center versus 59% of FTTA positive and 64% of patients with ISS ≥ 16 (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.93-1.15). Patients 55 years and older with an ISS ≥ 16 had only a slightly increased triage effect (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.08-2.58) compared with those with an ISS 0 to 15 (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.89-1.12).
Whereas FTTA appropriately triaged patients 15 to 54 years old to the trauma center, those 55 years old and older were much less likely to be triaged correctly. The reasons for this finding remain unknown, and further studies are needed to investigate and improve elderly triage.
55岁及以上患者的分诊不足情况很常见,65岁及以上患者的情况更糟。1999年,佛罗里达州立法机构实施了一项全州范围的创伤系统,包括一种新的佛罗里达创伤分诊算法(FTTA)。本研究探讨新系统如何影响年轻患者与老年患者的院前分诊。
在一家地区二级创伤中心对1年期间的适当分诊情况进行回顾性研究。如果患者FTTA呈阳性或损伤严重程度评分(ISS)≥16,则被视为有严重创伤。一个内部创伤审查小组检查医院出院数据以评估分诊准确性。计算比值比(OR)和置信区间(CI)。
15至54岁的非创伤患者中,有49%在创伤中心就诊,而FTTA呈阳性的患者为83%,ISS≥16的患者为86%(OR 2.88,95%CI 2.44 - 3.41)。对于ISS≥16的患者,OR为6.53(95%CI 4.07 - 10.47)。对于55岁及以上的患者,52%的非创伤患者被分诊到创伤中心,而FTTA呈阳性的患者为59%,ISS≥16的患者为64%(OR 1.03,95%CI 0.93 - 1.15)。与ISS为0至15的患者(OR 1.00,95%CI 0.89 - 1.12)相比,ISS≥16的55岁及以上患者的分诊效果仅略有增加(OR 1.67,95%CI 1.08 - 2.58)。
虽然FTTA将15至54岁的患者正确分诊到了创伤中心,但55岁及以上的患者被正确分诊的可能性要小得多。这一发现的原因尚不清楚,需要进一步研究以调查和改善老年患者的分诊。