Division of Neurotology, Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Complejo Hospitario Universitario de Santiago, Travesía DA Choupana, Postal Code 15706, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 May;270(5):1623-8. doi: 10.1007/s00405-012-2167-4. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
Bithermal caloric testing and vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) are both diagnostic tools for the study of the vestibular system. The first tests the horizontal semicircular canal and the second evaluates the saccule and lower vestibular nerve. The results of these two tests can therefore be expected to be correlated. The aim of this study was to compare bithermal caloric test results with VEMP records in normal subjects to verify whether they are correlated.
A prospective study was conducted in 60 healthy subjects (30 men and 30 women) who underwent otoscopy, pure tone audiometry, bithermal caloric testing and VEMPs. From the caloric test, we assessed the presence of possible vestibular hypofunction, whether there was directional preponderance and reflectivity of each ear (all based on both slow phase velocity and nystagmus frequency). The analysed VEMPs variables were: p1 and n1 latency, corrected amplitude, interaural p1 latency difference and p1 interaural amplitude asymmetry. We compared the reflectivity, hypofunction and directional preponderance of the caloric tests with the corrected amplitudes and amplitude asymmetries of the VEMPs. No correlations were found in the different comparisons between bithermal caloric testing results and VEMPs except for a weak correlation (p = 0.039) when comparing preponderance based on the number of nystagmus in the caloric test and amplitude asymmetry with 99 dB tone burst in the VEMPs test. The results indicate that the two diagnostic tests are not comparable, so one of them cannot replace the other, but the use of both increases diagnostic success in some conditions.
双侧冷热温度试验和前庭诱发肌源性电位(VEMPs)都是前庭系统研究的诊断工具。前者测试水平半规管,后者评估椭圆囊和下部前庭神经。因此,可以预期这两种测试的结果是相关的。本研究的目的是比较正常受试者双侧冷热温度试验结果与 VEMP 记录,以验证它们是否相关。
对 60 名健康受试者(30 名男性和 30 名女性)进行前瞻性研究,这些受试者接受了耳镜检查、纯音听阈测试、双侧冷热温度试验和 VEMPs。从冷热温度试验中,我们评估了是否存在可能的前庭功能低下,每个耳朵的方向性优势和反射性(均基于慢相速度和眼震频率)。分析的 VEMPs 变量包括:p1 和 n1 潜伏期、校正振幅、双耳 p1 潜伏期差异和 p1 耳间振幅不对称。我们比较了冷热温度试验的反射性、功能低下和方向性优势与 VEMPs 的校正振幅和振幅不对称。除了在冷热温度试验中基于眼震数量的优势与 VEMPs 测试中 99dB 音爆测试的振幅不对称之间的弱相关性(p=0.039)外,在冷热温度试验结果与 VEMPs 之间的不同比较中均未发现相关性。结果表明,这两种诊断测试不可比,因此一种不能替代另一种,但在某些情况下同时使用这两种方法可提高诊断成功率。