Suppr超能文献

博舒替尼对比伊马替尼用于新诊断的慢性期慢性髓性白血病:来自 BELA 试验的结果。

Bosutinib versus imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: results from the BELA trial.

机构信息

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Box 428, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2012 Oct 1;30(28):3486-92. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.7522. Epub 2012 Sep 4.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Bosutinib is an oral Src/Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitor. The phase III Bosutinib Efficacy and Safety in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (BELA) trial compared bosutinib with imatinib in newly diagnosed, chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 502 patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to bosutinib 500 mg per day or imatinib 400 mg per day.

RESULTS

The complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) rate at 12 months was not different for bosutinib (70%; 95% CI, 64% to 76%) versus imatinib (68%; 95% CI, 62% to 74%; two-sided P = .601); therefore, the study did not achieve its primary end point. The major molecular response (MMR) rate at 12 months was higher with bosutinib (41%; 95% CI, 35% to 47%) compared with imatinib (27%; 95% CI, 22% to 33%; two-sided P < .001). Time to CCyR and MMR was faster with bosutinib compared with imatinib (two-sided P < .001 for both). On-treatment transformation to accelerated/blast phase occurred in four patients (2%) on bosutinib compared with 10 patients (4%) on imatinib. A total of three CML-related deaths occurred on the bosutinib arm compared with eight on the imatinib arm. The safety profiles of bosutinib and imatinib were distinct; GI and liver-related events were more frequent with bosutinib, whereas neutropenia, musculoskeletal disorders, and edema were more frequent with imatinib.

CONCLUSION

This ongoing trial did not meet its primary end point of CCyR at 12 months, despite the observed higher MMR rate at 12 months, faster times to CCyR and MMR, fewer on-treatment transformations to accelerated/blast phase, and fewer CML-related deaths with bosutinib compared with imatinib. Each drug had a distinct safety profile.

摘要

目的

博舒替尼是一种口服Src/Abl 酪氨酸激酶抑制剂。III 期博舒替尼治疗新诊断慢性髓性白血病的疗效和安全性(BELA)试验比较了新诊断慢性期慢性髓性白血病(CML)患者中博舒替尼与伊马替尼的疗效。

患者和方法

共有 502 名患者被随机分配到博舒替尼 500mg/天或伊马替尼 400mg/天组,1:1 治疗。

结果

博舒替尼 12 个月时完全细胞遗传学缓解(CCyR)率与伊马替尼(70%;95%CI,64%至 76%)无差异(双侧 P=0.601);因此,该研究未达到主要终点。博舒替尼 12 个月时主要分子学缓解(MMR)率更高(41%;95%CI,35%至 47%),而伊马替尼为 27%(95%CI,22%至 33%;双侧 P<0.001)。与伊马替尼相比,博舒替尼更快达到 CCyR 和 MMR(双侧 P<0.001)。博舒替尼组有 4 名(2%)患者发生治疗相关加速/急变期转化,伊马替尼组有 10 名(4%)患者发生转化。博舒替尼组有 3 例 CML 相关死亡,伊马替尼组有 8 例。博舒替尼和伊马替尼的安全性特征不同;博舒替尼更常出现胃肠道和肝脏相关事件,而伊马替尼更常出现中性粒细胞减少、肌肉骨骼疾病和水肿。

结论

尽管博舒替尼在 12 个月时的 MMR 率更高,达到 CCyR 和 MMR 的时间更快,治疗相关加速/急变期转化的患者更少,与伊马替尼相比 CML 相关死亡更少,但本研究仍未达到 12 个月时 CCyR 的主要终点。两种药物均具有独特的安全性特征。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

6

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验