• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一线酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗慢性髓性白血病的疗效与安全性比较:一项系统评价与网状Meta分析

Comparative efficacy and safety of first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic myeloid leukemia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

作者信息

Zhang Jing-Jing, Qian Yu-Lan, Wu Zi-Yang, Li Yue, Guan Ying-Jie, Sun Cui, Fu Kai-Li, Mei Tong-Lin, Goyal Gaurav, Bernasconi Paolo, Damiani Daniela, Zhu Jian-Guo

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.

School of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

Transl Cancer Res. 2024 Jul 31;13(7):3783-3797. doi: 10.21037/tcr-24-747. Epub 2024 Jul 26.

DOI:10.21037/tcr-24-747
PMID:39145083
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11319984/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have become the preferred drugs for the treatment of chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). This study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of different TKIs as first-line treatments for CML using network meta-analysis (NMA), providing a basis for the precise clinical use of TKIs.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted on PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, China National knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Databases (VIP), SinoMed and ClinicalTrials.gov to include RCTs that compared the different TKIs as first line treatment for CML. The search timeline was from inception to 21 July 2023. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and the frequentist NMA methods, the efficacy and safety of different TKIs were compared, including the rates of major molecular response (MMR), complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), all grade adverse events, grade 3 or higher hematologic adverse events and liver toxicity.

RESULTS

A total of 25 RCTs involving 6,823 patients with CML and 6 types of TKIs were included. In terms of efficacy, second-generation TKIs such as dasatinib, nilotinib, and radotinib showed certain advantages in improving patients' MMR and CCyR compared to imatinib. Additionally, imatinib 800 mg provided better MMRs and CCyRs than imatinib 400 mg. As far as safety was concerned, there was no significant difference in the incidence of all grade adverse events among the different TKIs. All TKIs can cause serious grade 3-4 hematologic adverse events, including anemia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia. Dasatinib more likely caused anemia, bosutinib thrombocytopenia, and imatinib neutropenia, whereas nilotinib and flumatinib might have better safety profiles in terms of severe hematologic adverse events. For liver toxicity, radotinib 400 mg and imatinib 800 mg, respectively, had the highest likelihood of ranking first in incidence rates of all grade ALT and AST elevation.

CONCLUSIONS

In CML, second-generation TKIs are more clinically effective than imatinib even if this last drug has a relatively better safety profile. Thus, as each second-generation TKI has a distinct clinical efficacy and safety, and is associated with different economic factors, its choice should be dictated by the specific patient clinical conditions (patient's specific disease characteristics, comorbid conditions, potential drug interactions, as well as their adherence). Nevertheless, due to the limited number of original research, additional high-quality studies are needed to achieve any firm conclusion on which second-generation TKI is the best choice for that peculiar patient.

摘要

背景

酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)已成为治疗慢性期(CP)慢性髓性白血病(CML)的首选药物。本研究旨在使用网络荟萃分析(NMA)比较不同TKIs作为CML一线治疗的安全性和有效性,为TKIs的精准临床应用提供依据。

方法

对PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、Embase、中国知网(CNKI)、万方、维普中文科技期刊数据库(VIP)、中国生物医学文献数据库(SinoMed)和ClinicalTrials.gov进行系统检索,以纳入比较不同TKIs作为CML一线治疗的随机对照试验(RCTs)。检索时间范围为建库至2023年7月21日。采用系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)和频率学派NMA方法,比较不同TKIs的疗效和安全性,包括主要分子反应(MMR)率、完全细胞遗传学反应(CCyR)率、所有级别的不良事件、3级或更高等级的血液学不良事件和肝毒性。

结果

共纳入25项涉及6823例CML患者和6种TKIs的RCTs。在疗效方面,与伊马替尼相比,达沙替尼、尼罗替尼和拉多替尼等第二代TKIs在改善患者的MMR和CCyR方面显示出一定优势。此外,800 mg伊马替尼比400 mg伊马替尼提供更好的MMR和CCyR。就安全性而言,不同TKIs之间所有级别的不良事件发生率无显著差异。所有TKIs均可引起严重的3-4级血液学不良事件,包括贫血、血小板减少和中性粒细胞减少。达沙替尼更易引起贫血,博舒替尼易引起血小板减少,伊马替尼易引起中性粒细胞减少,而尼罗替尼和氟马替尼在严重血液学不良事件方面可能具有更好的安全性。对于肝毒性,400 mg拉多替尼和800 mg伊马替尼在所有级别谷丙转氨酶(ALT)和谷草转氨酶(AST)升高发生率方面分别最有可能排名第一。

结论

在CML中,即使伊马替尼具有相对较好的安全性,但第二代TKIs在临床上比伊马替尼更有效。因此,由于每种第二代TKI具有独特的临床疗效和安全性,且与不同的经济因素相关,其选择应根据患者的具体临床情况(患者的特定疾病特征、合并症、潜在药物相互作用以及依从性)来决定。然而,由于原始研究数量有限,需要更多高质量研究才能就哪种第二代TKI是该特定患者的最佳选择得出任何确凿结论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecf5/11319984/68d29c847b4b/tcr-13-07-3783-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecf5/11319984/a5bbb97c60ef/tcr-13-07-3783-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecf5/11319984/a32421954a05/tcr-13-07-3783-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecf5/11319984/b661a1baea89/tcr-13-07-3783-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecf5/11319984/696ca52a501b/tcr-13-07-3783-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecf5/11319984/68d29c847b4b/tcr-13-07-3783-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecf5/11319984/a5bbb97c60ef/tcr-13-07-3783-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecf5/11319984/a32421954a05/tcr-13-07-3783-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecf5/11319984/b661a1baea89/tcr-13-07-3783-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecf5/11319984/696ca52a501b/tcr-13-07-3783-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecf5/11319984/68d29c847b4b/tcr-13-07-3783-f5.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative efficacy and safety of first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic myeloid leukemia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.一线酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗慢性髓性白血病的疗效与安全性比较:一项系统评价与网状Meta分析
Transl Cancer Res. 2024 Jul 31;13(7):3783-3797. doi: 10.21037/tcr-24-747. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
2
Comparative Effectiveness of Newer Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Versus Imatinib in the First-Line Treatment of Chronic-Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Across Risk Groups: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Eight Randomized Trials.新型酪氨酸激酶抑制剂与伊马替尼在不同风险组慢性期慢性髓性白血病一线治疗中的疗效比较:八项随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2016 Jun;16(6):e85-94. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2016.03.003. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
3
Comparison of Hepatotoxicity Associated With New BCR-ABL Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors vs Imatinib Among Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.新型 BCR-ABL 酪氨酸激酶抑制剂与伊马替尼相关肝毒性比较:慢性髓性白血病患者的系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2120165. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.20165.
4
Comparative efficacy and safety of tyrosine kinase inhibitors for chronic myeloid leukaemia: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗慢性髓性白血病的疗效和安全性比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Eur J Cancer. 2018 Nov;104:9-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.08.016. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
5
Comparative efficacy and tolerability of front-line treatments for newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: an update network meta-analysis.新诊断的慢性期慢性髓性白血病一线治疗的疗效和耐受性比较:更新的网络荟萃分析。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Aug 28;19(1):849. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6039-9.
6
Comparison of cutaneous adverse events between second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors and imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.比较第二代酪氨酸激酶抑制剂和伊马替尼治疗慢性髓性白血病的皮肤不良反应:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Acta Oncol. 2023 Dec;62(12):1767-1774. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2023.2263152. Epub 2023 Nov 25.
7
Dasatinib, nilotinib and standard-dose imatinib for the first-line treatment of chronic myeloid leukaemia: systematic reviews and economic analyses.达沙替尼、尼洛替尼和标准剂量伊马替尼一线治疗慢性髓性白血病:系统评价和经济分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(42):iii-iv, 1-277. doi: 10.3310/hta16420.
8
Treatments for chronic myeloid leukemia: a qualitative systematic review.慢性髓性白血病的治疗:一项定性系统评价
J Blood Med. 2012;3:51-76. doi: 10.2147/JBM.S33380. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
9
Hematological Adverse Events with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗慢性髓性白血病的血液学不良事件:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Aug 31;15(17):4354. doi: 10.3390/cancers15174354.
10
First-line imatinib vs second- and third-generation TKIs for chronic-phase CML: a systematic review and meta-analysis.一线伊马替尼与第二代和第三代酪氨酸激酶抑制剂用于慢性期慢性粒细胞白血病的疗效比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Blood Adv. 2020 Jun 23;4(12):2723-2735. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019001329.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of the Efficacy Among Nilotinib, Dasatinib, Flumatinib and Imatinib in Newly Diagnosed Chronic-Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients: A Real-World Multi-Center Retrospective Study.尼洛替尼、达沙替尼、氟马替尼和伊马替尼在新诊断的慢性期慢性髓性白血病患者中的疗效比较:一项真实世界多中心回顾性研究。
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2024 Jun;24(6):e257-e266. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2024.02.008. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
2
Imatinib Optimized Therapy Improves Major Molecular Response Rates in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.伊马替尼优化疗法可提高慢性髓性白血病患者的主要分子反应率。
Pharmaceutics. 2022 Aug 12;14(8):1676. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14081676.
3
Bosutinib versus imatinib for newly diagnosed chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia: final results from the BFORE trial.
博舒替尼对比伊马替尼用于初诊慢性期慢性髓性白血病:BFORE 试验的最终结果。
Leukemia. 2022 Jul;36(7):1825-1833. doi: 10.1038/s41375-022-01589-y. Epub 2022 May 28.
4
Development of a framework and decision tool for the evaluation of health technologies based on surrogate endpoint evidence.基于替代终点证据的卫生技术评估框架和决策工具的制定。
Health Econ. 2022 Sep;31 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):44-72. doi: 10.1002/hec.4524. Epub 2022 May 24.
5
Treatment-free remission in chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated front-line with nilotinib: 10-year followup of the GIMEMA CML 0307 study.尼洛替尼一线治疗慢性髓性白血病患者的无治疗缓解:GIMEMA CML 0307 研究的 10 年随访。
Haematologica. 2022 Oct 1;107(10):2356-2364. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2021.280175.
6
[Analysis of the Curative Effect and Influencing Factors of Nilotinib Second-line and Dasatinib Third-line on Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Failed First-line and Second-line Treatment].尼洛替尼二线及达沙替尼三线治疗一线和二线治疗失败的慢性髓性白血病的疗效及影响因素分析
Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2022 Feb;30(1):30-35. doi: 10.19746/j.cnki.issn.1009-2137.2022.01.006.
7
Tailored tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) based on current evidence.基于当前证据的慢性髓性白血病(CML)的靶向酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)治疗。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2021 Dec;25(24):7787-7798. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202112_27625.
8
Asciminib and ponatinib exert synergistic anti-neoplastic effects on CML cells expressing -compound mutations.阿斯科利尼布和波纳替尼对表达复合突变的慢性粒细胞白血病细胞具有协同抗肿瘤作用。
Am J Cancer Res. 2021 Sep 15;11(9):4470-4484. eCollection 2021.
9
Estradiol Valerate Enhances Cardiac Function via the Nrf2 Signaling Pathway to Protect Against Oxidative Stress by the Nrf2 Signaling Pathway in an Ovariectomized Rat Model.戊酸雌二醇通过 Nrf2 信号通路增强心脏功能,以保护去卵巢大鼠模型中的氧化应激。
Curr Pharm Des. 2021;27(46):4716-4725. doi: 10.2174/1381612827666210927162612.
10
Long-term outcomes with frontline nilotinib versus imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: ENESTnd 10-year analysis.一线尼洛替尼对比伊马替尼治疗初诊慢性期慢性髓性白血病的长期疗效:ENESTnd 研究 10 年分析。
Leukemia. 2021 Feb;35(2):440-453. doi: 10.1038/s41375-020-01111-2. Epub 2021 Jan 7.