Kiang D T, Greenberg L J, Kennedy B J
Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis 55455.
Cancer. 1990 Jan 15;65(2):193-9. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19900115)65:2<193::aid-cncr2820650202>3.0.co;2-e.
Controversy exists in using carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) for monitoring the clinical course of breast cancer. In this study, the kinetics of two plasma tumor markers, CEA and CA15-3, immediately after the initiation of chemotherapy were assessed in 30 patients with advanced breast cancer. Four distinct kinetic patterns were seen. Two patterns fitted the expected relationship where the plasma marker increased during tumor progression (nine patients), and declined in tumor regression (five patients). The third pattern was paradoxical in that objective tumor regression in eight patients was associated with an acute surge of these markers followed by a steady decline. The doubling times for both CEA and CA15-3 were immediately shortened four-fold after therapy suggesting tumor cytolysis in treatment responders. Equally paradoxical was the fourth pattern where tumor progression in eight patients was associated with a rapid and transient decline of markers followed by rebounds. Such a rapid decline may be due to a suppression of marker release, as demonstrated in an in vitro study. Adequate knowledge of these putative paradoxical patterns will permit their effective use in monitoring the disease course and perhaps in the early prediction of the therapeutic response.
在使用癌胚抗原(CEA)监测乳腺癌临床病程方面存在争议。在本研究中,对30例晚期乳腺癌患者化疗开始后两种血浆肿瘤标志物CEA和CA15 - 3的动力学进行了评估。观察到四种不同的动力学模式。两种模式符合预期关系,即血浆标志物在肿瘤进展期间升高(9例患者),在肿瘤消退时下降(5例患者)。第三种模式自相矛盾,8例患者的客观肿瘤消退与这些标志物的急性升高随后稳定下降有关。治疗后CEA和CA15 - 3的倍增时间立即缩短四倍,提示治疗反应者存在肿瘤细胞溶解。同样自相矛盾的是第四种模式,8例患者的肿瘤进展与标志物的快速短暂下降随后反弹有关。这种快速下降可能是由于标志物释放受到抑制,体外研究已证明这一点。充分了解这些假定的矛盾模式将有助于在监测疾病进程以及可能在早期预测治疗反应方面有效利用它们。