Evaluating the quality and accessibility of physical activity resources in two southern cities.

PURPOSE

Access and quality of physical activity resources (PARs) influence physical activity (PA) participation. This study examined the type, size, accessibility, features, amenities, and incivilities of PARs in two cities.

DESIGN

Researchers identified all PARs within an 800-meter radius of the homes of participants from a larger study. Each PAR was evaluated by a trained assessor.

SETTING

PARs were evaluated in Houston and Austin, Texas.

PATIENTS

The final sample included 1326 PARs in Houston and 297 in Austin, Texas.

MEASURES

The 2010 Physical Activity Resource Assessment (PARA), a direct-observation audit tool, was used to assess the type, size, accessibility, features, amenities, and incivilities of a PAR.

ANALYSIS

Both t-tests and analyses of variance were used to determine differences in features, amenities, and incivilities by city, type, and accessibility.

RESULTS

Houston PARs had greater amenities (t[421]  =  4.445; p < .001) and fewer incivilities (t[371]  =  -6.89; p < .001) than Austin PARs. Combination resources had the highest score for features (M  =  9.94; standard deviation [SD]  =  5.62); fitness clubs had the highest score for amenities (M  =  17.06; SD  =  5.27); and trails had the most incivilities (M  =  4.23; SD  =  4.88). Free PARs had greater features (F[3, 1509]  =  16.87; p < .001), amenities (F[3, 1500]  =  3.13; p  =  .025), and incivilities (F[3, 1540]  =  21.97; p < .001) than pay for use PARs.

CONCLUSION

Improvements to quality and maintenance of existing free PARs may be an economical strategy to increase PA.