Suppr超能文献

在有明显显性出血的患者中,血管造影有作用吗?

Is there a role for angiography in patients with obscure overt bleeding?

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Sep;107(9):1377-9. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.216.

Abstract

Obscure gastrointestinal hemorrhage remains a challenging but uncommon clinical scenario. Video capsule endoscopy (VCE) has been recommended as the third diagnostic test after normal upper and lower endoscopic examinations. A recent randomized controlled trial comparing immediate VCE to angiography demonstrated a superior diagnostic yield for VCE compared with angiography. However, long-term outcomes, including rebleeding, hospitalization rates, and death, did not differ between the two cohorts. Although VCE appears to be superior to other testing modalities for overall diagnostic yield, the clinical outcomes ultimately depend upon the type of lesion detected. Vascular lesions, mainly small bowel angiodysplasia, can be expected to have the highest rates of rebleeding, despite endoscopic therapy, and have been associated with the presence of comorbid conditions.

摘要

不明原因的胃肠道出血仍然是一种具有挑战性但不常见的临床情况。视频胶囊内镜(VCE)已被推荐作为上消化道和下消化道内镜检查正常后的第三项诊断测试。最近一项比较立即行 VCE 与血管造影的随机对照试验显示,VCE 的诊断效果优于血管造影。然而,两组之间的长期结果(包括再出血、住院率和死亡率)没有差异。虽然 VCE 在总体诊断效果方面似乎优于其他检测方法,但临床结果最终取决于检测到的病变类型。血管病变,主要是小肠血管扩张症,尽管进行了内镜治疗,但仍有较高的再出血率,并与并存疾病有关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验