Suppr超能文献

半自动自动精子精液分析系统的评估。I. 准确性以及与传统方法和自动汉密尔顿-桑恩系统的比较。

Evaluation of the semi-automated Autosperm semen analysis system. I. Accuracy and comparison with the conventional method and the automated Hamilton-Thorn system.

作者信息

Yeung C H, Krüsemann C, Bunn H, Neuwinger J, Nieschlag E

机构信息

World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Research in Human Reproduction, University of Münster, Federal Republic of Germany.

出版信息

Fertil Steril. 1990 Jan;53(1):111-9.

PMID:2295329
Abstract

The accuracy of measurements by the semi-automated Autosperm (Amsaten N.V.S.A. Corp., DePinte, Belgium) semen analysis system was assessed by recounting and manually tracking sperm recorded on videotape during analysis of 51 ejaculates. Mean inaccuracies in the analysis of sperm concentration and percentage motility were 15% and 22%, respectively. Measurements of sperm movement characteristics relied on the skill of the operator and discrepancies (means around 10%, maximum 57% to 184%) depended on the straightness of sperm paths. Although less expensive than the fully automated system, semen analysis by Autosperm is a subjective and labor-intensive method. Furthermore in comparison, data obtained using Autosperm also provide less information, and agreements of matched data with those obtained by the conventional methods were not significantly better.

摘要

通过对51份射精样本分析过程中录像记录的精子进行重新计数和手动追踪,评估了半自动Autosperm(比利时德平特市Amsaten N.V.S.A.公司)精液分析系统测量的准确性。精子浓度和活力百分比分析中的平均误差分别为15%和22%。精子运动特征的测量依赖于操作人员的技能,差异(平均值约为10%,最大值为57%至184%)取决于精子路径的直线度。虽然比全自动系统便宜,但Autosperm精液分析是一种主观且劳动强度大的方法。此外,相比之下,使用Autosperm获得的数据提供的信息也较少,且匹配数据与传统方法获得的数据之间的一致性并无显著改善。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验