Institute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité University Medical Center, Berlin, Germany.
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2012 Sep 6;12:148. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-12-148.
There is a need for more Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) to strengthen the evidence base for clinical and policy decision-making. Effectiveness Guidance Documents (EGD) are targeted to clinical researchers. The aim of this EGD is to provide specific recommendations for the design of prospective acupuncture studies to support optimal use of resources for generating evidence that will inform stakeholder decision-making.
Document development based on multiple systematic consensus procedures (written Delphi rounds, interactive consensus workshop, international expert review). To balance aspects of internal and external validity, multiple stakeholders including patients, clinicians and payers were involved.
Recommendations focused mainly on randomized studies and were developed for the following areas: overall research strategy, treatment protocol, expertise and setting, outcomes, study design and statistical analyses, economic evaluation, and publication.
The present EGD, based on an international consensus developed with multiple stakeholder involvement, provides the first systematic methodological guidance for future CER on acupuncture.
需要更多的比较疗效研究(CER)来加强临床和政策决策的证据基础。有效性指导文件(EGD)针对临床研究人员。本 EGD 的目的是为前瞻性针灸研究的设计提供具体建议,以支持最佳利用资源来生成证据,为利益相关者的决策提供信息。
基于多种系统共识程序(书面德尔菲轮次、互动共识研讨会、国际专家审查)进行文件制定。为了平衡内部和外部有效性方面,包括患者、临床医生和支付者在内的多个利益相关者参与其中。
建议主要集中在随机研究上,并针对以下领域制定:总体研究策略、治疗方案、专业知识和环境、结果、研究设计和统计分析、经济评估和发表。
本 EGD 基于多利益相关者参与制定的国际共识,为未来的针灸 CER 提供了第一个系统的方法学指导。