Suppr超能文献

在桑给巴尔实施口服霍乱疫苗的效果:大规模疫苗接种运动和观察性队列研究的结果。

Effectiveness of an oral cholera vaccine in Zanzibar: findings from a mass vaccination campaign and observational cohort study.

机构信息

Ministry of Health, Zanzibar, Tanzania.

出版信息

Lancet Infect Dis. 2012 Nov;12(11):837-44. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70196-2. Epub 2012 Sep 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Zanzibar, in east Africa, has been severely and repeatedly affected by cholera since 1978. We assessed the effectiveness of oral cholera vaccination in high-risk populations in the archipelago to estimate the indirect (herd) protection conferred by the vaccine and direct vaccine effectiveness.

METHODS

We offered two doses of a killed whole-cell B-subunit cholera vaccine to individuals aged 2 years and older in six rural and urban sites. To estimate vaccine direct protection, we compared the incidence of cholera between recipients and non-recipients using generalised estimating equations with the log link function while controlling for potential confounding variables. To estimate indirect effects, we used a geographic information systems approach and assessed the association between neighbourhood-level vaccine coverage and the risk for cholera in the non-vaccinated residents of that neighbourhood, after controlling for potential confounding variables. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00709410.

FINDINGS

Of 48,178 individuals eligible to receive the vaccine, 23,921 (50%) received two doses. Between February, 2009, and May, 2010, there was an outbreak of cholera, enabling us to assess vaccine effectiveness. The vaccine conferred 79% (95% CI 47-92) direct protection against cholera in participants who received two doses. Indirect (herd) protection was shown by a decrease in the risk for cholera of non-vaccinated residents within a household's neighbourhood as the vaccine coverage in that neighbourhood increased.

INTERPRETATION

Our findings suggest that the oral cholera vaccine offers both direct and indirect (herd) protection in a sub-Saharan African setting. Mass oral cholera immunisation campaigns have the potential to provide not only protection for vaccinated individuals but also for the unvaccinated members of the community and should be strongly considered for wider use. Because this is an internationally-licensed vaccine, we could not undertake a randomised placebo-controlled trial, but the absence of vaccine effectiveness against non-cholera diarrhoea indicates that the noted protection against cholera could not be explained by bias.

FUNDING

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency, and the South Korean Government.

摘要

背景

东非的桑给巴尔自 1978 年以来多次遭受严重的霍乱疫情。我们评估了在该群岛高危人群中进行口服霍乱疫苗接种的效果,以估计疫苗的间接(群体)保护作用和直接疫苗效力。

方法

我们在六个农村和城市地区向 2 岁及以上的个体提供两剂灭活全细胞 B 亚单位霍乱疫苗。为了估计疫苗的直接保护作用,我们使用广义估计方程和对数链接函数,在控制潜在混杂变量的情况下,比较了接种者和未接种者的霍乱发病率。为了估计间接效应,我们使用地理信息系统方法,在控制潜在混杂变量的情况下,评估了社区级疫苗接种覆盖率与该社区未接种疫苗居民的霍乱风险之间的关联。这项研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT00709410。

结果

在符合接种条件的 48178 人中,有 23921 人(50%)接种了两剂疫苗。2009 年 2 月至 2010 年 5 月发生了霍乱疫情,使我们能够评估疫苗的效力。接种两剂疫苗的个体对霍乱的直接保护效力为 79%(95%CI 47-92)。通过增加社区内的疫苗接种覆盖率,可以降低非接种居民在家庭内的邻居中感染霍乱的风险,从而显示出间接(群体)保护作用。

解释

我们的研究结果表明,口服霍乱疫苗在撒哈拉以南非洲地区提供了直接和间接(群体)保护。大规模口服霍乱免疫运动不仅可以为接种个体提供保护,还可以为社区中未接种疫苗的成员提供保护,应该强烈考虑更广泛地使用。由于这是一种国际许可的疫苗,我们无法进行随机安慰剂对照试验,但对非霍乱腹泻没有疫苗效力表明,所观察到的对霍乱的保护作用不能用偏差来解释。

资助

比尔及梅琳达·盖茨基金会、瑞典国际发展合作署和韩国政府。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验