• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改良后的后盆腔切除术治疗晚期卵巢癌患者的初次和间隔减瘤术后发病率和生存情况比较。

Comparison of morbidity and survival between primary and interval cytoreductive surgery in patients after modified posterior pelvic exenteration for advanced ovarian cancer.

机构信息

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, CancerEst, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France.

出版信息

Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2012 Oct;22(8):1349-54. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e318265d358.

DOI:10.1097/IGC.0b013e318265d358
PMID:22954783
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Surgical management of advanced ovarian cancer often requires low modified posterior pelvic exenteration (MPE) to achieved complete resection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the morbidity of MPE at the time of primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS) and interval cytoreductive surgery (ICS) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 2001 to 2009, 63 patients underwent MPE for advanced ovarian cancer. We analyzed and compared surgical characteristics and postoperative courses between PCS and ICS.

RESULTS

Modified posterior pelvic exenteration was performed during PCS for 50 patients (79%) and during ICS for 13 patients (21%). Complete cytoreduction was achieved in 80% of patients (84% in the PCS group and 69% in the ICS group; ns). There was no significant difference between the PCS and ICS groups in the type and the rate of standards or radical surgical procedures. Patients with ICS had a shorter length of stay in the intensive care unit (0.9 vs 2.7 days; P = 0.009), but there was no difference in the total length of hospitalization (P = 0.94). The global rate of postoperative complications was 76%. No differences were found between the 2 groups in digestive or extradigestive complications, iterative surgery, or interventional radiology procedures. The median overall survival was 49.4 months in the PCS group and 27.1 months in the ICS group (P = 0.27), and the median progression-free survival time in both groups was 20 months.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no difference in the occurrence of postoperative complications between PCS and ICS, especially in morbidity related to MPE. The specific morbidity of this surgical procedure remained low compared with the overall morbidity in cases of extensive surgery.

摘要

目的

高级卵巢癌的外科治疗通常需要进行改良后的后路盆腔廓清术(MPE)以实现完全切除。本研究旨在评估新辅助化疗后初次细胞减灭术(PCS)和间隔细胞减灭术(ICS)时 MPE 的发病率。

材料与方法

2001 年至 2009 年,63 例患者因晚期卵巢癌接受 MPE。我们分析并比较了 PCS 和 ICS 时的手术特点和术后过程。

结果

50 例患者(79%)在 PCS 时行 MPE,13 例患者(21%)在 ICS 时行 MPE。80%的患者达到完全肿瘤减灭(PCS 组 84%,ICS 组 69%;无统计学差异)。PCS 组和 ICS 组标准或根治性手术的类型和比例无显著差异。ICS 组患者在重症监护病房的停留时间更短(0.9 天 vs 2.7 天;P = 0.009),但总住院时间无差异(P = 0.94)。术后并发症的总发生率为 76%。两组间在消化系统或消化系统外并发症、迭代手术或介入放射学程序方面无差异。PCS 组的中位总生存期为 49.4 个月,ICS 组为 27.1 个月(P = 0.27),两组的中位无进展生存期均为 20 个月。

结论

PCS 和 ICS 之间术后并发症的发生无差异,尤其是与 MPE 相关的发病率。与广泛手术的总发病率相比,这种手术的具体发病率仍然较低。

相似文献

1
Comparison of morbidity and survival between primary and interval cytoreductive surgery in patients after modified posterior pelvic exenteration for advanced ovarian cancer.改良后的后盆腔切除术治疗晚期卵巢癌患者的初次和间隔减瘤术后发病率和生存情况比较。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2012 Oct;22(8):1349-54. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e318265d358.
2
Role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the management of advanced ovarian cancer.新辅助化疗在晚期卵巢癌治疗中的作用
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(6):2369-73. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.6.2369.
3
Lymph Node Involvement Pattern and Survival Differences of FIGO IIIC and FIGO IIIA1 Ovarian Cancer Patients After Primary Complete Tumor Debulking Surgery: A 10-Year Retrospective Analysis of the Tumor Bank Ovarian Cancer Network.FIGO IIIC期和FIGO IIIA1期卵巢癌患者初次肿瘤完全减灭术后的淋巴结受累模式及生存差异:肿瘤库卵巢癌网络的10年回顾性分析
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Apr;23(4):1279-86. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4959-4. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
4
Secondary Cytoreduction in Platinum-Resistant Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: A Single-Institution Experience.铂耐药复发性卵巢癌的二次肿瘤细胞减灭术:单机构经验
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Dec;22(13):4211-6. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4523-2. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
5
Perioperative morbidity and mortality in octogenarians with ovarian cancer.八十岁以上卵巢癌患者的围手术期发病率和死亡率。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2013 Jul;23(6):1006-9. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e3182980fac.
6
Value of tertiary cytoreductive surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer: an international multicenter evaluation.上皮性卵巢癌三级细胞减灭术的价值:一项国际多中心评估。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Apr;20(4):1348-54. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2673-z. Epub 2012 Oct 2.
7
"The impact of debulking surgery in patients with node-positive epithelial ovarian cancer: Analysis of prognostic factors related to overall survival and progression-free survival after an extended long-term follow-up period".减瘤手术对淋巴结阳性上皮性卵巢癌患者的影响:长期随访期后总生存和无进展生存相关预后因素分析
Surg Oncol. 2016 Mar;25(1):49-59. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2015.12.005. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
8
Maximal-Effort Cytoreductive Surgery for Ovarian Cancer Patients with a High Tumor Burden: Variations in Practice and Impact on Outcome.高肿瘤负荷的卵巢癌患者的最大努力细胞减灭术:实践中的差异及其对结局的影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Sep;26(9):2943-2951. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07516-3. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
9
Liver resection for ovarian cancer liver metastases as part of cytoreductive surgery is safe and may bring survival benefit.作为肿瘤细胞减灭术一部分的卵巢癌肝转移灶肝切除术是安全的,且可能带来生存获益。
World J Surg Oncol. 2015 Aug 5;13:235. doi: 10.1186/s12957-015-0652-0.
10
Impact of complete cytoreduction leaving no gross residual disease associated with radical cytoreductive surgical procedures on survival in advanced ovarian cancer.根治性细胞减灭术治疗晚期卵巢癌时完全肿瘤细胞减灭术且无肉眼残留病灶对生存的影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Dec;19(13):4059-67. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2446-8. Epub 2012 Jul 6.

引用本文的文献

1
A novel classification of posterior pelvic exenteration to assess prognosis in female patients with locally advanced primary rectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study from China PelvEx collaborative.一种用于评估局部晚期原发性直肠癌女性患者预后的新型盆腔廓清术分类:来自中国盆腔廓清协作组的一项回顾性队列研究
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024 Apr 26;39(1):59. doi: 10.1007/s00384-024-04632-9.
2
The value of transitory protective stomas during primary debulking surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a retrospective cohort study.暂时性保护性造口在晚期上皮性卵巢癌初次肿瘤细胞减灭术中的价值:一项回顾性队列研究
Int J Surg. 2024 Nov 1;110(11):6922-6932. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001474.
3
Laparoscopic posterior pelvic exenteration is safe and feasible for locally advanced primary rectal cancer in female patients: a comparative study from China PelvEx collaborative.
腹腔镜盆腔后切除术治疗女性局部晚期原发性直肠癌的安全性和可行性:中国 PelvEx 协作组的一项对比研究。
Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Nov;27(11):1109-1117. doi: 10.1007/s10151-023-02824-z. Epub 2023 May 27.
4
Anastomotic Leak in Ovarian Cancer Cytoreduction Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.卵巢癌肿瘤细胞减灭术中吻合口漏:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Nov 7;14(21):5464. doi: 10.3390/cancers14215464.
5
Posterior pelvic exenteration for ovarian cancer: surgical and oncological outcomes.卵巢癌的盆腔后切除术:手术和肿瘤学结果。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2022 May;33(3):e31. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e31. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
6
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus primary debulking surgery in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis of peri-operative outcome.晚期上皮性卵巢癌新辅助化疗与初次肿瘤细胞减灭术的比较:围手术期结局的荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 23;12(10):e0186725. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186725. eCollection 2017.
7
Pelvic exenteration: experience from a rural cancer center in developing world.盆腔脏器切除术:来自发展中国家一家农村癌症中心的经验。
Int J Surg Oncol. 2015;2015:729658. doi: 10.1155/2015/729658. Epub 2015 Feb 8.