• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估度洛西汀治疗对 Sheehan 残疾量表测量的功能的影响:来自六项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床研究数据的汇总分析。

Evaluation of the effect of duloxetine treatment on functioning as measured by the Sheehan disability scale: pooled analysis of data from six randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical studies.

机构信息

Eli Lilly and Company, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy.

出版信息

Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2012 Nov;27(6):298-309. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0b013e3283589a3f.

DOI:10.1097/YIC.0b013e3283589a3f
PMID:22954893
Abstract

The purpose of this work is to describe the effect of duloxetine on functioning as measured by the Sheehan disability scale (SDS) compared with placebo in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). Pooled data from six randomized, parallel, double-blind, placebo-controlled duloxetine studies in adult MDD patients were analyzed at the short-term (7-13 weeks) and the long-term (>24 weeks) endpoint. The primary variable was the SDS total score. Secondary variables included functional remission (SDS total ≤ 6) rates, Hamilton rating scale for depression total score, and pain visual analog scale. Analysis of covariance and logistic regression methods were used to assess differences in treatment and identify prognostic baseline factors. In total, 2496 patients (1424 duloxetine; 1072 placebo) were included. The between-treatment difference of -2.52 between duloxetine and placebo in the SDS total score at the short-term endpoint was statistically significant in favor of duloxetine vs. placebo (95% confidence interval: -3.17, -1.87; P < 0.001). The endpoint functional remission rates were 39.5% with duloxetine and 28.7% with placebo. Time since first depression episode, antidepressant pretreatment (yes/no), baseline visual analog scale pain (≤30 / >30 mm), and sex were significant prognostic factors. The effect of duloxetine was maintained at the long-term endpoint. Duloxetine is effective in improving MDD patients' functioning. Further antidepressant studies focusing on functioning would be helpful.

摘要

本研究旨在描述度洛西汀与安慰剂相比对改善重度抑郁症(MDD)患者功能的作用,采用 Sheehan 残疾量表(SDS)进行评估。对 6 项度洛西汀治疗成年 MDD 患者的随机、平行、双盲、安慰剂对照短期(7-13 周)和长期(>24 周)研究的数据进行汇总分析。主要变量为 SDS 总分。次要变量包括功能缓解(SDS 总分≤6)率、汉密尔顿抑郁量表总分和疼痛视觉模拟量表。采用协方差分析和逻辑回归方法评估治疗差异,并识别预后基线因素。共纳入 2496 例患者(1424 例度洛西汀,1072 例安慰剂)。在短期终点,度洛西汀与安慰剂治疗的 SDS 总分差值为-2.52,度洛西汀显著优于安慰剂(95%置信区间:-3.17,-1.87;P<0.001)。度洛西汀治疗的缓解率为 39.5%,安慰剂组为 28.7%。首次抑郁发作后时间、抗抑郁药预处理(是/否)、基线视觉模拟量表疼痛(≤30/ >30mm)和性别是显著的预后因素。度洛西汀的疗效在长期终点得以维持。度洛西汀可有效改善 MDD 患者的功能。进一步关注功能的抗抑郁研究可能会有所帮助。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the effect of duloxetine treatment on functioning as measured by the Sheehan disability scale: pooled analysis of data from six randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical studies.评估度洛西汀治疗对 Sheehan 残疾量表测量的功能的影响:来自六项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床研究数据的汇总分析。
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2012 Nov;27(6):298-309. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0b013e3283589a3f.
2
Duloxetine efficacy for major depressive disorder in male vs. female patients: data from 7 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials.度洛西汀治疗男性与女性患者重度抑郁症的疗效:来自7项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验的数据。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2006 May;67(5):761-70. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v67n0510.
3
Duloxetine in the acute and long-term treatment of major depressive disorder: a placebo- and paroxetine-controlled trial.度洛西汀用于重度抑郁症的急性和长期治疗:一项安慰剂及帕罗西汀对照试验
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2004 Dec;14(6):457-70. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2004.01.002.
4
Assessment of functional outcomes by Sheehan Disability Scale in patients with major depressive disorder treated with duloxetine versus selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.用希恩残疾量表评估度洛西汀与选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂治疗的重度抑郁症患者的功能转归。
Hum Psychopharmacol. 2016 Jan;31(1):53-63. doi: 10.1002/hup.2500. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
5
A randomized placebo-controlled trial of duloxetine in patients with major depressive disorder and associated painful physical symptoms.一项度洛西汀治疗伴有疼痛性躯体症状的重性抑郁障碍患者的随机安慰剂对照试验。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2011 Oct;27(10):1849-58. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2011.609539. Epub 2011 Aug 12.
6
Duloxetine 60 mg once-daily in the treatment of painful physical symptoms in patients with major depressive disorder.度洛西汀每日一次60毫克用于治疗重度抑郁症患者的疼痛性躯体症状。
J Psychiatr Res. 2005 Jan;39(1):43-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2004.04.011.
7
Duloxetine in the treatment of Major Depressive Disorder: a comparison of efficacy in patients with and without melancholic features.度洛西汀治疗重度抑郁症:有与无 melancholic 特征患者的疗效比较
BMC Psychiatry. 2005 Jan 4;5:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-5-1.
8
Efficacy and safety of duloxetine 60 mg once daily in the treatment of pain in patients with major depressive disorder and at least moderate pain of unknown etiology: a randomized controlled trial.度洛西汀每日一次60毫克治疗重度抑郁症伴至少中度不明原因疼痛患者疼痛的疗效与安全性:一项随机对照试验。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2007 Nov;68(11):1707-16. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v68n1110.
9
Duloxetine versus placebo in the treatment of major depressive disorder and associated painful physical symptoms: a replication study.度洛西汀与安慰剂治疗主要抑郁障碍及相关躯体疼痛症状的比较:一项复制研究。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2011 Oct;27(10):1859-67. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2011.609540. Epub 2011 Aug 12.
10
Duloxetine for the treatment of major depressive disorder: a closer look at efficacy and safety data across the approved dose range.度洛西汀治疗重度抑郁症:深入审视批准剂量范围内的疗效和安全性数据。
J Psychiatr Res. 2006 Jun;40(4):337-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2005.08.010. Epub 2005 Nov 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of Changes in Quality of Life of Patients with Major Depressive Disorder-A Prospective Naturalistic 3-Month Follow-Up Study.重度抑郁症患者生活质量变化的预测因素——一项前瞻性自然主义3个月随访研究
J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 12;12(14):4628. doi: 10.3390/jcm12144628.
2
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of quetiapine and lithium for bipolar depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.喹硫平和锂治疗双相抑郁的疗效和安全性比较:系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Neuropsychopharmacol Rep. 2022 Dec;42(4):410-420. doi: 10.1002/npr2.12283. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
3
The Relationship Between Satisfaction With Life and Depression Symptoms by Gender.
按性别划分的生活满意度与抑郁症状之间的关系。
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Jun 14;10:419. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00419. eCollection 2019.
4
Clinical outcomes of patients with major depressive disorder treated with either duloxetine, escitalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine, or sertraline.使用度洛西汀、艾司西酞普兰、氟西汀、帕罗西汀或舍曲林治疗的重度抑郁症患者的临床结局。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2018 Sep 26;14:2473-2484. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S159800. eCollection 2018.
5
Analgesic Effects of Duloxetine on Formalin-Induced Hyperalgesia and Its Underlying Mechanisms in the CeA.度洛西汀对福尔马林诱导的痛觉过敏的镇痛作用及其在杏仁核中央核中的潜在机制
Front Pharmacol. 2018 Apr 10;9:317. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00317. eCollection 2018.
6
Categorical improvement in functional impairment in depressed patients treated with desvenlafaxine.接受度伐西汀治疗的抑郁患者的功能障碍有明显改善。
CNS Spectr. 2019 Jun;24(3):322-332. doi: 10.1017/S1092852917000633. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
7
Research Recommendations for Improving Measurement of Treatment Effectiveness in Depression.改善抑郁症治疗效果测量的研究建议。
Front Psychol. 2017 Mar 9;8:356. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00356. eCollection 2017.
8
The effect of vortioxetine on overall patient functioning in patients with major depressive disorder.文拉法辛对伴或不伴精神病性特征的抑郁症患者总体功能的影响
Brain Behav. 2017 Feb 2;7(3):e00622. doi: 10.1002/brb3.622. eCollection 2017 Mar.
9
The Effects of Newer Antidepressants on Occupational Impairment in Major Depressive Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.新型抗抑郁药对重性抑郁障碍职业功能损害的影响:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
CNS Drugs. 2016 May;30(5):405-17. doi: 10.1007/s40263-016-0334-7.
10
Reporting of Sex Effects by Systematic Reviews on Interventions for Depression, Diabetes, and Chronic Pain.系统评价对抑郁症、糖尿病和慢性疼痛干预措施的性别效应报告
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Aug 2;165(3):184-93. doi: 10.7326/M15-2877. Epub 2016 Apr 26.