Suppr超能文献

度洛西汀与安慰剂治疗主要抑郁障碍及相关躯体疼痛症状的比较:一项复制研究。

Duloxetine versus placebo in the treatment of major depressive disorder and associated painful physical symptoms: a replication study.

机构信息

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2011 Oct;27(10):1859-67. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2011.609540. Epub 2011 Aug 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Painful physical symptoms are common in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and can negatively affect patient outcomes. Duloxetine has demonstrated efficacy in treating MDD and other certain painful conditions; this study specifically evaluated patients with both MDD and MDD-associated pain.

METHODS

This randomized, double-blind clinical trial enrolled adult outpatients with MDD (DSM-IV-TR criteria; Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS] total score ≥20) and at least moderate pain (Brief Pain Inventory, Short Form [BPI] average pain rating ≥3). Patients received placebo (N = 266) or duloxetine (N = 261) 60 mg once daily (QD) (after starting dose of 30 mg QD for 1 week). This study replicated another study evaluating MDD and MDD-associated pain.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01070329).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Co-primary outcomes were the MADRS total score (change from baseline at 8 week endpoint) and BPI average pain rating (overall main effect over 8 weeks of treatment). The Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) global functional impairment score at week 8 assessed functioning as a secondary outcome. Changes were analyzed using mixed-effects model repeated measures (MMRM), and the MADRS remission rate (total score ≤12 at 8-week endpoint) was analyzed using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test.

RESULTS

Both co-primary objectives and the first two gated secondary objectives were achieved: compared with placebo, duloxetine significantly improved the mean MADRS total score, BPI average pain rating, SDS global functional impairment score, and remission of depression at 8-week endpoint (all p < 0.01). The third gated secondary objective, evaluating remission of depression at the last two non-missing visits, was not achieved. The within-group MADRS remission rate was greater for duloxetine-treated patients with ≥50% (versus <50%) improvement in BPI average pain (p < 0.001). Safety outcomes were similar to previous reports. This study did not address the effects of duloxetine on MDD and comorbid pain of a known origin.

CONCLUSIONS

These results replicated findings supporting the efficacy and tolerability of duloxetine compared to placebo as treatment for depression and pain in patients with MDD and at least moderate pain associated with MDD.

摘要

目的

疼痛性躯体症状在重度抑郁障碍(MDD)患者中较为常见,且可能对患者结局产生负面影响。度洛西汀在治疗 MDD 及其他某些疼痛性疾病方面已显示出疗效;本研究专门评估了 MDD 合并 MDD 相关疼痛的患者。

方法

本项随机、双盲临床试验纳入了 MDD(DSM-IV-TR 标准;蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表[MADRS]总分≥20)且至少存在中度疼痛(简明疼痛量表,短表[BPI]平均疼痛评分≥3)的成年门诊患者。患者接受安慰剂(N=266)或度洛西汀(N=261)60mg 每日 1 次(QD)(起始剂量 30mg QD 治疗 1 周后)。本研究复制了另一项评估 MDD 合并 MDD 相关疼痛的研究。

临床试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT01070329)。

主要结局指标

共同的主要结局指标为 MADRS 总分(8 周终点时自基线的变化)和 BPI 平均疼痛评分(8 周治疗期间的整体主要疗效)。第 8 周时的 Sheehan 残疾量表(SDS)整体功能损伤评分作为次要结局进行评估。采用混合效应模型重复测量(MMRM)分析变化,采用 Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel 检验分析 MADRS 缓解率(8 周终点时总分≤12)。

结果

均达到了共同的主要目标和前两个有条件的次要目标:与安慰剂相比,度洛西汀显著改善了 MADRS 总分、BPI 平均疼痛评分、SDS 整体功能损伤评分和 8 周时的抑郁缓解(均 P<0.01)。未达到第三个有条件的次要目标,即评估最后两次非缺失就诊时的抑郁缓解。BPI 平均疼痛改善≥50%(而非<50%)的度洛西汀治疗患者中,组内 MADRS 缓解率更高(P<0.001)。安全性结局与既往报告一致。本研究未解决度洛西汀对 MDD 及与 MDD 相关的已知来源疼痛的疗效。

结论

这些结果复制了与安慰剂相比,度洛西汀治疗 MDD 合并至少中度疼痛患者的抑郁和疼痛的疗效和耐受性的研究发现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验