Suppr超能文献

用希恩残疾量表评估度洛西汀与选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂治疗的重度抑郁症患者的功能转归。

Assessment of functional outcomes by Sheehan Disability Scale in patients with major depressive disorder treated with duloxetine versus selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.

作者信息

Sheehan David V, Mancini Michele, Wang Jianing, Berggren Lovisa, Cao Haijun, Dueñas Héctor José, Yue Li

机构信息

Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.

Eli Lilly and Company, Bad Homburg, Germany.

出版信息

Hum Psychopharmacol. 2016 Jan;31(1):53-63. doi: 10.1002/hup.2500. Epub 2015 Sep 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We compared functional impairment outcomes assessed with Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) after treatment with duloxetine versus selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in patients with major depressive disorder.

METHODS

Data were pooled from four randomized studies comparing treatment with duloxetine and SSRIs (three double blind and one open label). Analysis of covariance, with last-observation-carried-forward approach for missing data, explored treatment differences between duloxetine and SSRIs on SDS changes during 8 to 12 weeks of acute treatment for the intent-to-treat population. Logistic regression analysis examined the predictive capacity of baseline patient characteristics for remission in functional impairment (SDS total score ≤ 6 and SDS item scores ≤ 2) at endpoint.

RESULTS

Included were 2193 patients (duloxetine n = 1029; SSRIs n = 835; placebo n = 329). Treatment with duloxetine and SSRIs resulted in significantly (p < 0.01) greater improvements in the SDS total score versus treatment with placebo. Higher SDS (p < 0.0001) or 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale baseline scores (p < 0.01) predicted lower probability of functional improvement after treatment with duloxetine or SSRIs. Female gender (p ≤ 0.05) predicted higher probability of functional improvement after treatment with duloxetine or SSRIs.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with SSRIs and duloxetine improved functional impairment in patients with major depressive disorder. Higher SDS or 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale baseline scores predicted less probability of SDS improvement; female gender predicted better improvement in functional impairment at endpoint.

摘要

目的

我们比较了度洛西汀与选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)治疗重度抑郁症患者后,使用希恩残疾量表(SDS)评估的功能损害结果。

方法

数据来自四项比较度洛西汀与SSRIs治疗的随机研究(三项双盲研究和一项开放标签研究)。采用协方差分析,并对缺失数据采用末次观察结转法,探讨度洛西汀与SSRIs在急性治疗8至12周期间,对意向性治疗人群SDS变化的治疗差异。逻辑回归分析检验了基线患者特征对终点时功能损害缓解(SDS总分≤6且SDS项目得分≤2)的预测能力。

结果

纳入2193例患者(度洛西汀组n = 1029;SSRIs组n = 835;安慰剂组n = 329)。与安慰剂治疗相比,度洛西汀和SSRIs治疗使SDS总分有显著(p < 0.01)更大改善。较高的SDS(p < 0.0001)或17项汉密尔顿抑郁量表基线评分(p < 0.01)预测度洛西汀或SSRIs治疗后功能改善的可能性较低。女性(p≤0.05)预测度洛西汀或SSRIs治疗后功能改善的可能性较高。

结论

SSRIs和度洛西汀治疗改善了重度抑郁症患者的功能损害。较高的SDS或17项汉密尔顿抑郁量表基线评分预测SDS改善的可能性较小;女性预测终点时功能损害改善更好。

相似文献

5
Escitalopram and duloxetine in major depressive disorder: a pharmacoeconomic comparison using UK cost data.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26(11):969-81. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200826110-00008.
8
Duloxetine in the acute and long-term treatment of major depressive disorder: a placebo- and paroxetine-controlled trial.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2004 Dec;14(6):457-70. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2004.01.002.
9
Double-blind comparison of escitalopram and duloxetine in the acute treatment of major depressive disorder.
Clin Drug Investig. 2007;27(7):481-92. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200727070-00005.
10
An Open-Label Pilot Study of Duloxetine in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Comorbid Major Depressive Disorder.
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2016 Dec;36(6):710-715. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000000599.

引用本文的文献

6
Symptom Clusters and Functional Impairment in Individuals Treated for Lyme Borreliosis.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Aug 21;7:464. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00464. eCollection 2020.
8
Safety and effectiveness of escitalopram in an 8-week open study in Chinese patients with depression and anxiety.
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2018 Aug 14;14:2087-2097. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S164673. eCollection 2018.
9
The effect of vortioxetine on overall patient functioning in patients with major depressive disorder.
Brain Behav. 2017 Feb 2;7(3):e00622. doi: 10.1002/brb3.622. eCollection 2017 Mar.

本文引用的文献

6
A randomized placebo-controlled trial of duloxetine in patients with major depressive disorder and associated painful physical symptoms.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2011 Oct;27(10):1849-58. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2011.609539. Epub 2011 Aug 12.
7
Duloxetine versus placebo in the treatment of major depressive disorder and associated painful physical symptoms: a replication study.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2011 Oct;27(10):1859-67. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2011.609540. Epub 2011 Aug 12.
8
Change in psychosocial functioning and depressive symptoms during acute-phase cognitive therapy for depression.
Psychol Med. 2012 Feb;42(2):317-26. doi: 10.1017/S0033291711001279. Epub 2011 Jul 25.
9
The importance of norepinephrine in depression.
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2011;7(Suppl 1):9-13. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S19619. Epub 2011 May 31.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验