Suppr超能文献

一项关于在乳腺癌辅助化疗后继续使用地塞米松超过 24 小时对生活质量影响的随机双盲安慰剂对照交叉试验。

A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over trial of the impact on quality of life of continuing dexamethasone beyond 24 h following adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

机构信息

Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Nov;136(1):143-51. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-2205-3. Epub 2012 Sep 6.

Abstract

Uncertainty remains about the optimal anti-emetic regimen for control of delayed nausea and vomiting after adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Many patients receive dexamethasone but complain of insomnia, anxiety/agitation, and indigestion. The aim was to determine if patients receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer prefer treatment with dexamethasone or placebo for prophylaxis against delayed nausea and vomiting, and to compare quality of life (QOL) between the two treatments. In this randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial, we compared oral dexamethasone (4 mg twice daily for 2 days) versus placebo for chemotherapy-naïve patients with breast cancer. All patients received intravenous granisetron and dexamethasone pre-chemotherapy and oral granisetron on day 2. Primary endpoints were: (i) patient preference; (ii) difference between cycles in change of QOL from days 1 to 8. Median age of the 94 women was 51 years (range 27-76): 79 received fluorouracil/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide and 15 received doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide. Thirteen withdrew pre-cycle 2 with no differences between arms. Of 80 patients stating a preference, 31 preferred placebo (39 %, 95 % CI: 28-50 %) and 37 (46 %, 95 % CI: 35-58 %) preferred dexamethasone; 12 had no preference. There were no differences in intensity of vomiting, nausea, or time to onset of vomiting. There was greater decrease in global QOL (p = 0.06) when patients received dexamethasone. No other symptom/QOL domains differed significantly. In conclusion, no significant difference was found in patient preference, QOL, or symptoms regardless of whether dexamethasone or placebo was used after adjuvant chemotherapy.

摘要

对于接受乳腺癌辅助化疗后延迟性恶心和呕吐的控制,最佳止吐方案仍存在不确定性。许多患者接受地塞米松治疗,但会抱怨失眠、焦虑/烦躁不安和消化不良。目的是确定接受乳腺癌化疗的患者是否更喜欢使用地塞米松或安慰剂预防延迟性恶心和呕吐,并比较两种治疗方法的生活质量(QOL)。在这项随机、双盲、交叉试验中,我们比较了口服地塞米松(化疗前 2 天每天 2 次,每次 4mg)与安慰剂治疗乳腺癌化疗初治患者的效果。所有患者均在化疗前接受静脉注射格拉司琼和地塞米松,并在第 2 天接受口服格拉司琼。主要终点为:(i)患者偏好;(ii)从第 1 天到第 8 天 QOL 变化的周期差异。94 名女性的中位年龄为 51 岁(范围 27-76 岁):79 名接受氟尿嘧啶/表柔比星/环磷酰胺治疗,15 名接受多柔比星/环磷酰胺治疗。13 名患者在第 2 个周期前退出,两组间无差异。在表示偏好的 80 名患者中,31 名(39%,95%CI:28-50%)偏好安慰剂,37 名(46%,95%CI:35-58%)偏好地塞米松;12 名患者无偏好。呕吐、恶心的强度或呕吐开始时间无差异。接受地塞米松治疗的患者全球 QOL 下降更明显(p=0.06)。其他症状/QOL 领域无显著差异。结论,无论辅助化疗后使用地塞米松还是安慰剂,患者偏好、QOL 或症状均无显著差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验