Suppr超能文献

改良微创心脏手术对小儿患者的安全性优势。

Safety advantage of modified minimally invasive cardiac surgery for pediatric patients.

作者信息

Nakanishi Keisuke, Matsushita Satoshi, Kawasaki Shiori, Tambara Keiichi, Yamamoto Taira, Morita Terumasa, Inaba Hirotaka, Kuwaki Kenji, Amano Atsushi

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Juntendo University, School of Medicine, 2-1-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan.

出版信息

Pediatr Cardiol. 2013 Mar;34(3):525-9. doi: 10.1007/s00246-012-0487-1. Epub 2012 Sep 7.

Abstract

Minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) using a small surgical incision in children provides less physical stress. However, concern about safety due to the small surgical field has been noted. Recently, the authors developed a modified MICS procedure to extend the surgical field. This report assesses the safety and benefit of this modified procedure by comparing three procedures: the modified MICS (group A), conventional MICS (group B), and traditional open heart surgery (group C). A retrospective analysis was performed with 111 pediatric patients (age, 0-9 years; weight, 5-30 kg) who underwent cardiac surgery for simple cardiac anomaly during the period 1996-2010 at Juntendo University Hospital. The modified MICS method to extend the surgical view has been performed since 2004. A skin incision within 5 cm was made below the nipple line, and the surgical field was easily moved by pulling up or down using a suture or a hemostat. The results showed no differences in terms of gender, age, weight, or aortic cross-clamp time among the groups. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated significant differences in mean time before cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), CPB time, operation time, and bleeding. According to the indices, modified MICS was similar to traditional open surgery and shorter time or lower bleeding volume than conventional MICS. No major mortality or morbidity occurred. In conclusion, the modified MICS procedure, which requires no special techniques, was as safe as conventional open heart surgery and even reduced perioperative morbidity.

摘要

在儿童中使用小手术切口的微创心脏手术(MICS)对身体的应激较小。然而,有人指出由于手术视野小而存在安全方面的担忧。最近,作者开发了一种改良的MICS手术方法以扩大手术视野。本报告通过比较三种手术方法来评估这种改良手术的安全性和益处:改良MICS(A组)、传统MICS(B组)和传统心脏直视手术(C组)。对1996年至2010年期间在顺天堂大学医院接受简单心脏畸形心脏手术的111例儿科患者(年龄0至9岁;体重5至30千克)进行了回顾性分析。自2004年以来一直采用改良的MICS方法来扩大手术视野。在乳头线下方做一个5厘米以内的皮肤切口,通过使用缝线或止血钳向上或向下牵拉,手术视野可轻松移动。结果显示,各组之间在性别、年龄、体重或主动脉阻断时间方面无差异。方差分析(ANOVA)表明,在体外循环(CPB)前的平均时间、CPB时间、手术时间和出血量方面存在显著差异。根据各项指标,改良MICS与传统心脏直视手术相似,且比传统MICS时间更短或出血量更少。未发生重大死亡或并发症。总之,改良的MICS手术无需特殊技术,与传统心脏直视手术一样安全,甚至降低了围手术期发病率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验