Hu Chuan-Xian, Tan Juan, Chen Sheng, Ding Hui, Xu Zhi-Wei
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Huai'an First People's Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 223300, China.
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, Zhejiang, 321004, China.
Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2014 Aug;7(8):625-629. doi: 10.1016/S1995-7645(14)60105-X.
To compare the clinical outcomes of minimally invasive right subaxillary vertical thoracotomy and traditional median sternotomy through right atrium in treatment of common congenital heart diseases.
Clinical data of 59 cases of common congenital heart diseases treated with minimally invasive right axillary vertical thoracotomy from May, 2011 to February, 2013 and 77 cases of same diseases with traditional median sternotomy in the past three years were retrospectively analyzed, including atrial septal defect, membranous ventricular septal defect and partial endocardial cushion defect. The results were compared from the two groups, including the time for operation and cardiopulmonary bypass, amount of blood transfusion, postoperative drainage, ventilation time, hospital stay, and prognosis.
No severe complications happened in both groups, like deaths or secondary surgery caused by bleeding. No significant differences were in CPB time and postoperative ventilator time between groups (P>0.05), while for all of the operative time, the length of incision, postoperative drainage and hospital stay, minimally invasive right axillary vertical thoracotomy was superior to median sternotomy, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). In six-month followup after operation, no complications of residual deformity and pericardial effusion were found in both groups by doing echocardiography, but mild pectus carinatum was found in 8 patients in the traditional median sternotomy group (traditional group), whereas patients in another group were well recovered.
Minimally invasive right subaxillary vertical thoracotomy for common congenital heart diseases is as safe as traditional median sternotomy, without the increasing incidence of postoperative complications. Additionally, compared with traditional median sternotomy, minimally invasive right subaxillary vertical thoracotomy is better in the aspects of hidden incision, appearance, and postoperative recovery.
比较微创右腋下垂直切口胸廓切开术与传统经右心房正中胸骨切开术治疗常见先天性心脏病的临床疗效。
回顾性分析2011年5月至2013年2月采用微创右腋下垂直切口胸廓切开术治疗的59例常见先天性心脏病患者以及过去三年采用传统正中胸骨切开术治疗的77例同类型疾病患者的临床资料,包括房间隔缺损、膜周部室间隔缺损和部分心内膜垫缺损。比较两组的手术时间、体外循环时间、输血量、术后引流量、通气时间、住院时间及预后。
两组均未发生严重并发症,如死亡或因出血导致的二次手术。两组体外循环时间和术后呼吸机使用时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),而在手术总时间、切口长度、术后引流量和住院时间方面,微创右腋下垂直切口胸廓切开术优于正中胸骨切开术,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后6个月随访,经超声心动图检查两组均未发现残余畸形和心包积液并发症,但传统正中胸骨切开术组(传统组)有8例患者出现轻度鸡胸,而另一组患者恢复良好。
微创右腋下垂直切口胸廓切开术治疗常见先天性心脏病与传统正中胸骨切开术同样安全,术后并发症发生率未增加。此外,与传统正中胸骨切开术相比,微创右腋下垂直切口胸廓切开术在切口隐蔽性、外观及术后恢复方面更优。