U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Marine Mammals Management 1011 E. Tudor Rd, MS-341, Anchorage, Alaska, 99503.
Ecol Evol. 2012 Aug;2(8):2072-90. doi: 10.1002/ece3.317. Epub 2012 Jul 22.
The extent and duration of sea-ice habitats used by Pacific walrus (Odobenus rosmarus divergens) are diminishing resulting in altered walrus behavior, mortality, and distribution. I document changes that have occurred over the past several decades and make predictions to the end of the 21st century. Climate models project that sea ice will monotonically decline resulting in more ice-free summers of longer duration. Several stressors that may impact walruses are directly influenced by sea ice. How these stressors materialize were modeled as most likely-case, worst-case, and best-case scenarios for the mid- and late-21st century, resulting in four comprehensive working hypotheses that can help identify and prioritize management and research projects, identify comprehensive mitigation actions, and guide monitoring programs to track future developments and adjust programs as needed. In the short term, the most plausible hypotheses predict a continuing northward shift in walrus distribution, increasing use of coastal haulouts in summer and fall, and a population reduction set by the carrying capacity of the near shore environment and subsistence hunting. Alternatively, under worst-case conditions, the population will decline to a level where the probability of extinction is high. In the long term, walrus may seasonally abandon the Bering and Chukchi Seas for sea-ice refugia to the northwest and northeast, ocean warming and pH decline alter walrus food resources, and subsistence hunting exacerbates a large population decline. However, conditions that reverse current trends in sea ice loss cannot be ruled out. Which hypothesis comes to fruition depends on how the stressors develop and the success of mitigation measures. Best-case scenarios indicate that successful mitigation of unsustainable harvests and terrestrial haulout-related mortalities can be effective. Management and research should focus on monitoring, elucidating effects, and mitigation, while ultimately, reductions in greenhouse gas emissions are needed to reduce sea-ice habitat losses.
太平洋海象(Odobenus rosmarus divergens)的海冰栖息地的范围和持续时间正在缩小,导致海象行为、死亡率和分布发生变化。本文记录了过去几十年发生的变化,并对 21 世纪末进行了预测。气候模型预测海冰将单调减少,导致夏季无冰期更长。有几个可能影响海象的压力源直接受到海冰的影响。这些压力源的表现形式被建模为 21 世纪中叶和晚期最可能的情况、最坏的情况和最好的情况,从而产生了四个全面的工作假设,这些假设可以帮助确定和优先考虑管理和研究项目,确定全面的缓解措施,并指导监测计划,以跟踪未来的发展,并根据需要调整计划。在短期内,最合理的假设预测海象的分布将继续向北转移,夏季和秋季越来越多地使用沿海栖息地,而近海环境和生存性狩猎的承载能力将导致种群减少。或者,在最坏的情况下,该种群的数量将下降到灭绝概率很高的水平。从长远来看,海象可能会季节性地放弃白令海和楚科奇海,前往西北和东北方向的海冰避难所,海洋变暖和 pH 值下降会改变海象的食物资源,而生存性狩猎会加剧大量种群减少。然而,不能排除当前海冰损失趋势逆转的情况。哪个假设会实现取决于压力源的发展和缓解措施的成功与否。最好的情况表明,可持续性收获和与陆地栖息地相关的死亡率的缓解措施可以有效。管理和研究应侧重于监测、阐明影响和缓解,而最终需要减少温室气体排放以减少海冰栖息地的丧失。