• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项网络荟萃分析比较了每周一次接受艾塞那肽或每日一次接受利拉鲁肽治疗与每日一次接受甘精胰岛素、每日两次接受艾塞那肽或安慰剂治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者的血糖控制情况。

A network meta-analysis to compare glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with exenatide once weekly or liraglutide once daily in comparison with insulin glargine, exenatide twice daily or placebo.

机构信息

Oxford Outcomes Ltd, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013 Mar;15(3):213-23. doi: 10.1111/dom.12007. Epub 2012 Oct 3.

DOI:10.1111/dom.12007
PMID:22958381
Abstract

AIMS

The glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) exenatide once weekly (ExQW) and liraglutide once daily (QD) are indicated to improve glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Although glycaemic control with ExQW versus liraglutide QD 1.8 mg has been directly compared, no studies have compared ExQW with liraglutide QD 1.2 mg or determined the probable relative efficacies of various injectable therapies for glycaemic control; therefore, a network meta-analysis was performed to address these questions.

METHODS

A systematic review identified randomized controlled trials of ≥24 weeks that compared ExQW, liraglutide QD (1.2 mg, 1.8 mg), insulin glargine, exenatide twice daily (ExBID), or placebo. Twenty-two studies evaluating 11 049 patients were included in the network meta-analysis. Mean differences in HbA1c relative to placebo or each other and probability rankings were estimated.

RESULTS

Estimated mean differences in HbA1c versus placebo were -1.15% (95% CrI: -1.31 to -1.00) for ExQW, -1.01% (95% CrI: -1.18 to -0.85) for liraglutide 1.2 mg, and -1.18% (95% CrI: -1.32 to -1.04) for liraglutide 1.8 mg. HbA1c differences for ExQW versus liraglutide 1.2 mg and 1.8 mg were -0.14% (95% CrI: -0.34 to 0.06) and 0.03% (95% CrI: -0.14 to 0.18), respectively. The estimated mean difference in HbA1c between liraglutide 1.2 mg and 1.8 mg was 0.17% (95% CrI: 0.02-0.30). Results were consistent when adjusted for background antihyperglycaemic medications and diabetes duration.

CONCLUSIONS

This network meta-analysis did not identify meaningful differences in HbA1c lowering between ExQW and both liraglutide doses, suggesting that these GLP-1 RAs have similar glycaemic effects.

摘要

目的

胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs)艾塞那肽每周一次(ExQW)和利拉鲁肽每日一次(QD)被批准用于改善 2 型糖尿病患者的血糖控制。虽然已经直接比较了 ExQW 与利拉鲁肽 QD 1.8mg 的血糖控制,但尚无研究比较 ExQW 与利拉鲁肽 QD 1.2mg 或确定各种注射用疗法对血糖控制的可能相对疗效;因此,进行了一项网络荟萃分析来解决这些问题。

方法

系统评价确定了≥24 周的随机对照试验,比较了 ExQW、利拉鲁肽 QD(1.2mg、1.8mg)、甘精胰岛素、艾塞那肽每日两次(ExBID)或安慰剂。网络荟萃分析共纳入了 22 项研究共 11049 名患者。估计了相对于安慰剂或彼此的 HbA1c 均值差异和概率排名。

结果

ExQW 相对于安慰剂的 HbA1c 估计平均差异为-1.15%(95%置信区间:-1.31 至-1.00),利拉鲁肽 1.2mg 为-1.01%(95%置信区间:-1.18 至-0.85),利拉鲁肽 1.8mg 为-1.18%(95%置信区间:-1.32 至-1.04)。ExQW 与利拉鲁肽 1.2mg 和 1.8mg 的 HbA1c 差异分别为-0.14%(95%置信区间:-0.34 至 0.06)和 0.03%(95%置信区间:-0.14 至 0.18)。利拉鲁肽 1.2mg 和 1.8mg 之间 HbA1c 的估计平均差异为 0.17%(95%置信区间:0.02-0.30)。当调整背景抗高血糖药物和糖尿病持续时间后,结果仍然一致。

结论

这项网络荟萃分析未发现 ExQW 和利拉鲁肽两种剂量在降低 HbA1c 方面有意义的差异,表明这些 GLP-1 RAs 具有相似的血糖作用。

相似文献

1
A network meta-analysis to compare glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with exenatide once weekly or liraglutide once daily in comparison with insulin glargine, exenatide twice daily or placebo.一项网络荟萃分析比较了每周一次接受艾塞那肽或每日一次接受利拉鲁肽治疗与每日一次接受甘精胰岛素、每日两次接受艾塞那肽或安慰剂治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者的血糖控制情况。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013 Mar;15(3):213-23. doi: 10.1111/dom.12007. Epub 2012 Oct 3.
2
Efficacy and safety of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and mixed-treatment comparison analysis.胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂在2型糖尿病治疗中的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和混合治疗比较分析
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017 Apr;19(4):524-536. doi: 10.1111/dom.12849. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
3
Newer agents for blood glucose control in type 2 diabetes: systematic review and economic evaluation.新型 2 型糖尿病血糖控制药物:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 Jul;14(36):1-248. doi: 10.3310/hta14360.
4
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists compared with basal insulins for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂与基础胰岛素治疗2型糖尿病的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017 Feb;19(2):228-238. doi: 10.1111/dom.12805. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
5
Dipeptidyl-peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 analogues for prevention or delay of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its associated complications in people at increased risk for the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus.二肽基肽酶(DPP)-4抑制剂和胰高血糖素样肽(GLP)-1类似物用于预防或延缓2型糖尿病高危人群发生2型糖尿病及其相关并发症。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 10;5(5):CD012204. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012204.pub2.
6
Glucagon-like peptide analogues for type 2 diabetes mellitus.用于2型糖尿病的胰高血糖素样肽类似物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Oct 5;2011(10):CD006423. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006423.pub2.
7
Efficacy and safety of long-acting glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists compared with exenatide twice daily and sitagliptin in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.长效胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂与艾塞那肽每日 2 次和西格列汀在 2 型糖尿病中的疗效和安全性比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Pharmacother. 2011 Jul;45(7-8):850-60. doi: 10.1345/aph.1Q024. Epub 2011 Jul 5.
8
Effect of GLP-1 receptor agonists on waist circumference among type 2 diabetes patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂对2型糖尿病患者腰围的影响:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Endocrine. 2015 Apr;48(3):794-803. doi: 10.1007/s12020-014-0373-0. Epub 2014 Aug 13.
9
Is insulin the most effective injectable antihyperglycaemic therapy?胰岛素是最有效的注射类降糖治疗药物吗?
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015 Feb;17(2):145-51. doi: 10.1111/dom.12402. Epub 2014 Nov 9.
10
Effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on weight loss in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂对2型糖尿病患者体重减轻的影响:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
J Diabetes Res. 2015;2015:157201. doi: 10.1155/2015/157201. Epub 2015 Jan 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Exenatide for obesity in children and adolescents: Systematic review and meta-analysis.艾塞那肽用于儿童和青少年肥胖症:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Apr 3;15:1290184. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1290184. eCollection 2024.
2
Glycemic control and neonatal outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus treated using glyburide, metformin, or insulin: a pairwise and network meta-analysis.使用格列吡嗪、二甲双胍或胰岛素治疗的妊娠期糖尿病女性的血糖控制和新生儿结局:一项成对和网络荟萃分析。
BMC Endocr Disord. 2021 Oct 12;21(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12902-021-00865-9.
3
Battle of GLP-1 delivery technologies.
GLP-1 递送技术之战。
Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018 May;130:113-130. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.07.009. Epub 2018 Jul 21.
4
Neurodevelopment in Young Children Born to HIV-Infected Mothers: A Meta-analysis.HIV 感染母亲所生幼儿的神经发育:一项荟萃分析。
Pediatrics. 2018 Feb;141(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-2888.
5
Cost Effectiveness of Exenatide Once Weekly Versus Insulin Glargine and Liraglutide for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Greece.每周一次艾塞那肽对比甘精胰岛素和利拉鲁肽治疗希腊 2 型糖尿病的成本效果分析。
Clin Drug Investig. 2018 Jan;38(1):67-77. doi: 10.1007/s40261-017-0586-0.
6
A Review of the Long-Term Efficacy, Tolerability, and Safety of Exenatide Once Weekly for Type 2 Diabetes.艾塞那肽每周一次治疗2型糖尿病的长期疗效、耐受性及安全性综述
Adv Ther. 2017 Aug;34(8):1791-1814. doi: 10.1007/s12325-017-0499-6. Epub 2017 Jul 3.
7
Comparative effectiveness of glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with GLP-1 receptor agonists: a network meta-analysis of placebo-controlled and active-comparator trials.胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂治疗2型糖尿病患者血糖控制的比较有效性:安慰剂对照和活性对照试验的网状荟萃分析
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2017 Mar 29;10:111-122. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S116810. eCollection 2017.
8
Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Treatment Attributes Important to Injection-Experienced Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Preference Study in Germany and the United Kingdom.胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂治疗对有注射经验的2型糖尿病患者的重要属性:德国和英国的一项偏好研究
Diabetes Ther. 2017 Apr;8(2):335-353. doi: 10.1007/s13300-017-0237-8. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
9
Liraglutide Versus SGLT-2 Inhibitors in People with Type 2 Diabetes: A Network Meta-Analysis.利拉鲁肽与SGLT-2抑制剂治疗2型糖尿病患者的网状Meta分析
Diabetes Ther. 2017 Feb;8(1):85-99. doi: 10.1007/s13300-016-0217-4. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
10
A Systematic Review of Methods for Handling Missing Variance Data in Meta-Analyses of Interventions in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.2型糖尿病干预措施Meta分析中处理缺失方差数据方法的系统评价
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 17;11(10):e0164827. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164827. eCollection 2016.