Suppr超能文献

非HIV感染的肺孢子菌肺炎:传统的社区获得性肺炎指南是否低估了其严重程度?

Non-HIV Pneumocystis pneumonia: do conventional community-acquired pneumonia guidelines under estimate its severity?

作者信息

Asai Nobuhiro, Motojima Shinji, Ohkuni Yoshihiro, Matsunuma Ryo, Nakasima Kei, Iwasaki Takuya, Nakashita Tamao, Otsuka Yoshihito, Kaneko Norihiro

机构信息

Department of Pulmonology, Kameda Medical Center, 296-8602, 929 higashi-cho, Kamogawa-city, Chiba, Japan.

出版信息

Multidiscip Respir Med. 2012 Jun 11;7(1):2. doi: 10.1186/2049-6958-7-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Non-HIV Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) can occur in immunosuppressed patients having malignancy or on immunosuppressive agents. To classify severity, the A-DROP scale proposed by the Japanese Respiratory Society (JRS), the CURB-65 score of the British Respiratory Society (BTS) and the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) are widely used in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in Japan. To evaluate how correctly these conventional prognostic guidelines for CAP reflect the severity of non-HIV PCP, we retrospectively analyzed 21 patients with non-HIV PCP.

METHODS

A total of 21 patients were diagnosed by conventional staining and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for respiratory samples with chest x-ray and computed tomography (CT) findings. We compared the severity of 21 patients with PCP classified by A-DROP, CURB-65, and PSI. Also, patients' characteristics, clinical pictures, laboratory results at first visit or admission and intervals from diagnosis to start of specific-PCP therapy were evaluated in both survivor and non-survivor groups.

RESULTS

Based on A-DROP, 18 patients were classified as mild or moderate; respiratory failure developed in 15 of these 18 (83.3%), and 7/15 (46.7%) died. Based on CURB-65, 19 patients were classified as mild or moderate; respiratory failure developed in 16/19 (84.2%), and 8 of the 16 (50%) died. In contrast, PSI classified 14 as severe or extremely severe; all of the 14 (100%) developed respiratory failure and 8/14 (57.1%) died. There were no significant differences in laboratory results in these groups. The time between the initial visit and diagnosis, and the time between the initial visit and starting of specific-PCP therapy were statistically shorter in the survivor group than in the non-survivor group.

CONCLUSIONS

Conventional prognostic guidelines for CAP could underestimate the severity of non-HIV PCP, resulting in a therapeutic delay resulting in high mortality. The most important factor to improve the mortality of non-HIV PCP is early diagnosis and starting of specific-PCP therapy as soon as possible.

摘要

背景

非HIV卡氏肺孢子虫肺炎(PCP)可发生于患有恶性肿瘤或正在使用免疫抑制剂的免疫抑制患者中。为了对病情严重程度进行分类,日本呼吸学会(JRS)提出的A-DROP量表、英国胸科学会(BTS)的CURB-65评分以及美国传染病学会(IDSA)的肺炎严重程度指数(PSI)在日本社区获得性肺炎(CAP)患者中被广泛应用。为了评估这些传统的CAP预后指南对非HIV PCP严重程度的反映准确程度,我们对21例非HIV PCP患者进行了回顾性分析。

方法

通过对21例患者的呼吸道样本进行传统染色和聚合酶链反应(PCR),并结合胸部X线和计算机断层扫描(CT)结果进行诊断。我们比较了根据A-DROP、CURB-65和PSI对21例PCP患者进行分类的严重程度。此外,还评估了幸存者和非幸存者组患者的特征、临床表现、首次就诊或入院时的实验室检查结果以及从诊断到开始特异性PCP治疗的间隔时间。

结果

根据A-DROP,18例患者被分类为轻度或中度;这18例患者中有15例(83.3%)发生呼吸衰竭,其中7/15(46.7%)死亡。根据CURB-65,19例患者被分类为轻度或中度;16/19(84.2%)发生呼吸衰竭,其中16例中的8例(50%)死亡。相比之下,PSI将14例分类为重度或极重度;这14例患者全部(100%)发生呼吸衰竭,8/14(57.1%)死亡。这些组间实验室检查结果无显著差异。幸存者组从初次就诊到诊断的时间以及从初次就诊到开始特异性PCP治疗的时间在统计学上比非幸存者组短。

结论

传统的CAP预后指南可能低估了非HIV PCP的严重程度,导致治疗延迟,从而导致高死亡率。提高非HIV PCP死亡率的最重要因素是尽早诊断并尽快开始特异性PCP治疗。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验