Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5869, USA.
Lancet. 2012 Oct 27;380(9852):1473-81. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60862-9. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
During in-hospital cardiac arrests, how long resuscitation attempts should be continued before termination of efforts is unknown. We investigated whether duration of resuscitation attempts varies between hospitals and whether patients at hospitals that attempt resuscitation for longer have higher survival rates than do those at hospitals with shorter durations of resuscitation efforts.
Between 2000 and 2008, we identified 64,339 patients with cardiac arrests at 435 US hospitals within the Get With The Guidelines—Resuscitation registry. For each hospital, we calculated the median duration of resuscitation before termination of efforts in non-survivors as a measure of the hospital's overall tendency for longer attempts. We used multilevel regression models to assess the association between the length of resuscitation attempts and risk-adjusted survival. Our primary endpoints were immediate survival with return of spontaneous circulation during cardiac arrest and survival to hospital discharge.
31,198 of 64,339 (48·5%) patients achieved return of spontaneous circulation and 9912 (15·4%) survived to discharge. For patients achieving return of spontaneous circulation, the median duration of resuscitation was 12 min (IQR 6-21) compared with 20 min (14-30) for non-survivors. Compared with patients at hospitals in the quartile with the shortest median resuscitation attempts in non-survivors (16 min [IQR 15-17]), those at hospitals in the quartile with the longest attempts (25 min [25-28]) had a higher likelihood of return of spontaneous circulation (adjusted risk ratio 1·12, 95% CI 1·06-1·18; p<0·0001) and survival to discharge (1·12, 1·02-1·23; 0·021).
Duration of resuscitation attempts varies between hospitals. Although we cannot define an optimum duration for resuscitation attempts on the basis of these observational data, our findings suggest that efforts to systematically increase the duration of resuscitation could improve survival in this high-risk population.
American Heart Association, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholars Program, and the National Institutes of Health.
在院内心脏骤停期间,终止复苏尝试之前应继续复苏尝试多长时间尚不清楚。我们研究了复苏尝试的持续时间在医院之间是否存在差异,以及在尝试复苏时间较长的医院中患者的存活率是否高于复苏尝试时间较短的医院。
在 2000 年至 2008 年间,我们在 Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation 注册研究中确定了 435 家美国医院的 64339 名心脏骤停患者。对于每家医院,我们计算了非幸存者中终止复苏努力前的中位数复苏持续时间,作为医院整体延长尝试的指标。我们使用多水平回归模型评估复苏尝试的长度与风险调整后存活率之间的关联。我们的主要终点是心脏骤停期间自主循环恢复的即刻存活率和出院存活率。
在 64339 名患者中,有 31198 名(48.5%)患者恢复了自主循环,有 9912 名(15.4%)患者出院存活。对于恢复自主循环的患者,中位数复苏持续时间为 12 分钟(IQR 6-21),而非幸存者为 20 分钟(14-30)。与非幸存者中中位数复苏尝试最短的四分位数(16 分钟 [IQR 15-17])的患者相比,在非幸存者中中位数复苏尝试最长的四分位数(25 分钟 [25-28])的患者更有可能恢复自主循环(调整风险比 1.12,95%CI 1.06-1.18;p<0.0001)和出院存活率(1.12,1.02-1.23;0.021)。
复苏尝试的持续时间在医院之间存在差异。尽管我们不能根据这些观察数据确定复苏尝试的最佳持续时间,但我们的研究结果表明,有系统地延长复苏时间的努力可能会提高这一高危人群的存活率。
美国心脏协会、罗伯特伍德约翰逊基金会临床学者计划和美国国立卫生研究院。