Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Am J Surg. 2013 Jan;205(1):77-84. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.05.009. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
The aims of this study were to characterize obstacles affecting current sign-out practices and to evaluate the potential impact of standardized sign-out guidelines.
In June 2011, detailed guidelines for transitions of care were implemented, and a 29-item multiple-choice survey was developed to assess sign-out practices, attitudes, and barriers to effective communication. Surveys were administered to residents and nurses at 3 time points. Comparisons between time points were assessed using t tests and χ(2) tests (α = .05).
Guideline implementation achieved nonsignificant improvements in satisfaction with sign-outs, perceptions of patient safety, adequacy of information provided in sign-out, and patient knowledge by on-call residents. On follow-up, concerns surfaced regarding less complete sign-out processes due to new duty-hour restrictions.
Guideline implementation mildly improved perceptions of safety and adequacy of sign-out; however, persistent barriers to continuity of care remain. Sign-out standardization may not adequately ensure patient safety, and further efforts to improve handoff processes are in need.
本研究旨在描述影响当前交班实践的障碍,并评估标准化交班指南的潜在影响。
2011 年 6 月,详细的交接班指南实施,并且制定了 29 项多项选择调查,以评估交班实践、态度和有效沟通的障碍。在 3 个时间点向住院医师和护士进行了调查。使用 t 检验和 χ(2)检验(α=0.05)比较时间点之间的差异。
指南实施对交班满意度、对患者安全的感知、交班提供的信息量以及值班住院医师对患者知识的掌握程度略有改善。随访时,由于新的工作时间限制,交班过程不够完整的问题浮出水面。
指南实施轻微改善了对安全和交班充分性的认知;然而,连续性护理的持续障碍仍然存在。交班标准化可能不能充分确保患者安全,需要进一步努力改进交接过程。