Department of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Jan;34(1):234-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2012.07.023. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
The aim of this study was to validate a questionnaire on mastery motivation (task and effort) for use with Chinese preschool children in Hong Kong. A parent version and a teacher version were developed and evaluated. Participants included 457 children (230 boys and 227 girls) aged four and five years old, their preschool teachers and their parents. Further, 44 children (39 boys and 5 girls) with developmental disabilities were recruited. The children were assessed on the cognitive sub-test of the Preschool Development Assessment Scale (PDAS). Their parents completed the task and effort motivation scales, as well as the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Their teachers also completed the task and effort motivation scales. Rasch analysis results provided support for the unidimensionality of the parent and teacher versions of the two motivation scales. The parent and teacher versions of the two motivation scales correlated positively with the PDAS cognitive sub-test and the SDQ prosocial scale scores, and negatively with the SDQ total problem behavior scores. Children with developmental disabilities were assigned lower scores by their teachers and parents on the two motivation scales, compared with children with typical development. Reliability (Cronbach's Alpha) of the parent and teacher versions of the two motivation scales were above .70. The results suggested that the task and effort motivation scales were promising instruments for the assessment of motivation among Chinese preschool children.
本研究旨在验证一份针对香港学前儿童的掌握动机(任务和努力)问卷,该问卷有家长版和教师版。参与者包括 457 名 4 至 5 岁的儿童(230 名男孩和 227 名女孩)、他们的学前教师和家长。此外,还招募了 44 名有发育障碍的儿童(39 名男孩和 5 名女孩)。对儿童进行了学前发展评估量表(PDAS)认知分量表的评估。他们的家长完成了任务和努力动机量表以及长处和困难问卷(SDQ)。他们的教师还完成了任务和努力动机量表。Rasch 分析结果支持了这两个动机量表的家长版和教师版的单维性。两个动机量表的家长版和教师版与 PDAS 认知分量表和 SDQ 亲社会量表得分呈正相关,与 SDQ 总问题行为得分呈负相关。与发育正常的儿童相比,有发育障碍的儿童在两个动机量表上的得分较低,他们的教师和家长对这两个动机量表的评价较低。两个动机量表的家长版和教师版的可靠性(Cronbach's Alpha)均高于 0.70。研究结果表明,任务和努力动机量表是评估中国学前儿童动机的有前途的工具。