Bitlis State Hospital, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Bitlis, Turkey.
Clin Rehabil. 2013 Apr;27(4):347-54. doi: 10.1177/0269215512459062. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
To investigate the efficacy of intermittent and continuous traction in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis.
A randomized, controlled, observer-blind seven-week trial.
Hospital-based outpatient practice.
Ninety-eight patients with stage 3 knee osteoarthritis according to Kellgren-Lawrence radiological rating scale.
All 98 patients were randomly assigned to three treatment groups, for three weeks (weekends excluded). The control group (n=30, mean age: 59.30±8.16) received hot pack and short wave diathermy; the intermittent group (n=30, mean age: 58.20±7.78) received hot pack, short wave diathermy and intermittent traction; and the continuous group (n=30, mean age: 57.97±9.53) received hot pack, short wave diathermy and continuous traction.
The values of the Turkish version of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), visual analog scale, and knee passive range of motion were measured at baseline, three-week and seven-week follow-up.
Compared with baseline at weeks 3 and 7, all the outcome measures, except range of motion, were significantly reduced in all groups (all P≤0.001). In terms of the change data from baseline to week 3, both traction groups were significantly superior to the control in the WOMAC physical function scores. Considering the change data from baseline to week 7, both traction groups were significantly superior to the control in the pain scores, physical function and total scores, while only the continuous group was significantly better than the control in the stiffness scores (control: 1.17 ± 1.64; continuous: 2.38 ± 1.44) (P=0.014). Compared with baseline at weeks 3 and 7, range of motion values significantly increased in both traction groups (P<0.05) but not in the control (P>0.05). However, there were no significant differences among the three groups considering the change data from baseline to week 7 in range of motion values (P=0.300).
Joint traction was found to be beneficial for the improvement of pain and physical function loss related to knee osteoarthritis.
探讨间歇牵引与持续牵引治疗膝骨关节炎的疗效。
随机、对照、观察者盲法 7 周试验。
医院门诊。
98 例 Kellgren-Lawrence 放射学分级为 3 期的膝骨关节炎患者。
所有 98 例患者随机分为 3 组,每组治疗 3 周(周末除外)。对照组(n=30,平均年龄:59.30±8.16)接受热敷和短波透热疗法;间歇组(n=30,平均年龄:58.20±7.78)接受热敷、短波透热和间歇牵引;持续组(n=30,平均年龄:57.97±9.53)接受热敷、短波透热和持续牵引。
采用土耳其版 Western Ontario 和 McMaster 大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)、视觉模拟评分法和膝关节被动活动范围,在基线、3 周和 7 周随访时进行评估。
与基线相比,所有组在第 3 周和第 7 周时,除活动范围外,所有指标均显著降低(均 P≤0.001)。就从基线到第 3 周的变化数据而言,牵引组在 WOMAC 躯体功能评分方面均显著优于对照组。考虑从基线到第 7 周的变化数据,在疼痛评分、躯体功能和总分方面,两组牵引组均显著优于对照组,而仅持续牵引组在僵硬评分方面显著优于对照组(对照组:1.17±1.64;持续组:2.38±1.44)(P=0.014)。与第 3 周和第 7 周的基线相比,两组牵引组的活动范围均显著增加(P<0.05),但对照组无显著增加(P>0.05)。然而,考虑从基线到第 7 周的变化数据,三组之间在活动范围方面无显著差异(P=0.300)。
关节牵引有利于改善膝骨关节炎引起的疼痛和躯体功能丧失。