• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于电话的病例管理干预措施可减少频繁急诊就诊者的医疗保健利用。

A telephone-based case-management intervention reduces healthcare utilization for frequent emergency department visitors.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Eur J Emerg Med. 2013 Oct;20(5):327-34. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e328358bf5a.

DOI:10.1097/MEJ.0b013e328358bf5a
PMID:22960802
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A small group of frequent visitors to emergency departments accounts for a disproportional large number of total emergency department visits. Previous interventions in this population have shown mixed results.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a nurse-managed telephone-based case-management intervention can reduce healthcare utilization and improve self-assessed health status in frequent emergency department users.

METHODS

We carried out a Zelen-design randomized-controlled trial among patients who were identified as frequent emergency department users (≥ 3 visits during the 6 months before inclusion) at the Karolinska University Hospital in Stockholm (Sweden). Patients included in the study (n = 268) were randomized to either the intervention group or the control group and followed for 1 year. Patients who declined to participate or could not be reached were also followed for the study outcome.

RESULTS

The telephone-based case-management intervention reduced the total number of outpatient visits (relative risk 0.80; 95% confidence interval 0.75-0.84), the number of emergency department visits (relative risk 0.77; 95% confidence interval 0.69-0.86), the number of days patients were admitted to hospitals as well as the total healthcare costs for hospital admissions. There was no difference in mortality or other identified adverse outcomes between the intervention and the control groups. Patient self-assessed health status improved for the patients who received the case-management intervention.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that the nurse-managed telephone-based case-management intervention represents a possible strategy to improve care for frequent emergency department users as well as decrease outpatient visits, admission days and healthcare costs.

摘要

背景

一小部分经常光顾急诊部的患者占据了急诊部总就诊人数的不成比例的大部分。以前针对这一人群的干预措施效果参差不齐。

目的

确定护士管理的基于电话的病例管理干预措施是否可以减少高频急诊患者的医疗保健利用,并改善其自我评估的健康状况。

方法

我们在斯德哥尔摩卡罗林斯卡大学医院(瑞典)进行了一项 Zelen 设计的随机对照试验,纳入了被确定为高频急诊患者(在纳入前 6 个月内就诊≥3 次)的患者。研究纳入的患者(n=268)被随机分为干预组或对照组,并随访 1 年。拒绝参与或无法联系到的患者也进行了研究结果的随访。

结果

基于电话的病例管理干预措施减少了门诊就诊次数(相对风险 0.80;95%置信区间 0.75-0.84)、急诊就诊次数(相对风险 0.77;95%置信区间 0.69-0.86)、患者住院天数以及住院总医疗费用。干预组和对照组在死亡率或其他确定的不良结局方面没有差异。接受病例管理干预的患者自我评估的健康状况有所改善。

结论

我们的结果表明,护士管理的基于电话的病例管理干预措施可能是改善高频急诊患者护理以及减少门诊就诊、住院天数和医疗保健费用的一种策略。

相似文献

1
A telephone-based case-management intervention reduces healthcare utilization for frequent emergency department visitors.基于电话的病例管理干预措施可减少频繁急诊就诊者的医疗保健利用。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2013 Oct;20(5):327-34. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e328358bf5a.
2
A case management intervention targeted to reduce healthcare consumption for frequent Emergency Department visitors: results from an adaptive randomized trial.一项旨在减少频繁急诊就诊者医疗消费的病例管理干预措施:一项适应性随机试验的结果。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2016 Oct;23(5):344-50. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000280.
3
["Active health management" can provide support for vulnerable patients. New model for the prevention of unplanned healthcare].“积极健康管理”可为弱势患者提供支持。预防非计划性医疗保健的新模式。
Lakartidningen. 2016 Feb 9;113:DUEX.
4
Is information sharing between the emergency department and primary care useful to the care of frequent emergency department users?急诊科与基层医疗之间的信息共享对频繁光顾急诊科的患者的护理是否有用?
Eur J Emerg Med. 2008 Feb;15(1):34-9. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e3282aa4115.
5
Reducing utilization by uninsured frequent users of the emergency department: combining case management and drop-in group medical appointments.减少无保险的急诊频繁使用者的利用:结合病例管理和随到随诊团体医疗预约。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2012 Mar-Apr;25(2):184-91. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2012.02.110156.
6
Operation care: a pilot case management intervention for frequent emergency medical system users.操作关怀:一种针对频繁使用急诊医疗系统患者的试点案例管理干预措施。
Am J Emerg Med. 2012 Feb;30(2):352-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2010.12.012. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
7
A randomized controlled evaluation of specialist nurse education following accident and emergency department attendance for acute asthma.对急性哮喘患者在急诊科就诊后接受专科护士教育的随机对照评估。
Respir Med. 2000 Sep;94(9):900-8. doi: 10.1053/rmed.2000.0861.
8
Effect of telephone calls from primary care practices on follow-up visits after pediatric emergency department visits: evidence from the Pediatric Emergency Department Links to Primary Care (PEDLPC) randomized controlled trial.基层医疗诊所电话随访对儿科急诊科就诊后复诊的影响:来自儿科急诊科与基层医疗联系(PEDLPC)随机对照试验的证据。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009 Jun;163(6):505-11. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.45.
9
Reducing emergency visits in older adults with chronic illness. A randomized, controlled trial of group visits.减少慢性病老年人的急诊就诊次数。一项关于小组就诊的随机对照试验。
Eff Clin Pract. 2001 Mar-Apr;4(2):49-57.
10
An Emergency Department-initiated, web-based, multidisciplinary approach to decreasing emergency department visits by the top frequent visitors using patient care plans.急诊科发起的基于网络的多学科方法,通过患者护理计划减少最频繁就诊患者的急诊科就诊次数。
J Emerg Med. 2013 Apr;44(4):853-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.08.020. Epub 2012 Oct 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Care Coordination for High-Need, High-Cost Commercially Insured Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.针对高需求、高成本商业保险患者的护理协调:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2511804. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.11804.
2
Spread and Scale-Up of a Region-Wide Telehealth Navigation Service in a Rural Context: Qualitative Process Evaluation.农村地区全区域远程医疗导航服务的推广与扩大:定性过程评估
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 23;27:e64734. doi: 10.2196/64734.
3
A mapping review of interventions to address patients who frequently seek care in the emergency department.
针对频繁到急诊科就诊的患者的干预措施的映射回顾。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Mar 27;24(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-00970-7.
4
Stakeholders' perceptions of a nurse-led telehealth case management intervention in primary care for patients with complex care needs: a qualitative descriptive study.利益相关者对初级保健中护士主导的远程医疗病例管理干预措施在满足复杂护理需求患者中的看法:一项定性描述性研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 16;13(10):e073679. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073679.
5
Strategies for utilisation management of hospital services: a systematic review of interventions.医院服务利用管理策略:干预措施的系统评价。
Global Health. 2022 May 23;18(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12992-022-00835-3.
6
Impact of a case-management intervention for reducing emergency attendance on primary care: randomised control trial.一项关于减少初级保健中急诊就诊的病例管理干预措施的影响:随机对照试验。
Br J Gen Pract. 2022 Mar 3;72(723):e755-63. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0545.
7
Telehealth interventions: remote monitoring and consultations for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).远程医疗干预:针对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的远程监测和咨询。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 20;7(7):CD013196. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013196.pub2.
8
Zelen design clinical trials: why, when, and how.泽伦设计临床试验:为何、何时以及如何。
Trials. 2021 Aug 17;22(1):541. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05517-w.
9
Impact of a telephone triage service for non-critical emergencies in Switzerland: A cross-sectional study.瑞士非危急紧急情况电话分诊服务的影响:一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 2;16(4):e0249287. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249287. eCollection 2021.
10
Proactive Health Support: Exploring Face-to-Face Start-Up Sessions Between Participants and Registered Nurses at the Onset of Telephone-Based Self-Management Support.积极健康支持:探索在基于电话的自我管理支持开始时参与者与注册护士之间的面对面启动会议。
Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2020 Jun 30;7:2333393620930026. doi: 10.1177/2333393620930026. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.