• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳腺浸润性癌的小叶状组织学和新辅助化疗反应。

Lobular histology and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in invasive breast cancer.

机构信息

Department of Experimental Therapy, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Nov;136(1):35-43. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-2233-z. Epub 2012 Sep 8.

DOI:10.1007/s10549-012-2233-z
PMID:22961065
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5702179/
Abstract

Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) has been reported to be less responsive to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) than invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). We sought to determine whether ILC histology indeed predicts poor response to NAC by analyzing tumor characteristics such as protein expression, gene expression, and imaging features, and by comparing NAC response rates to those seen in IDC after adjustment for these factors. We combined datasets from two large prospective NAC trials, including in total 676 patients, of which 75 were of lobular histology. Eligible patients had tumors ≥3 cm in diameter or pathologic documentation of positive nodes, and underwent serial biopsies, expression microarray analysis, and MRI imaging. We compared pathologic complete response (pCR) rates and breast conservation surgery (BCS) rates between ILC and IDC, adjusted for clinicopathologic factors. On univariate analysis, ILCs were significantly less likely to have a pCR after NAC than IDCs (11 vs. 25 %, p = 0.01). However, the known differences in tumor characteristics between the two histologic types, including hormone receptor (HR) status, HER2 status, histological grade, and p53 expression, accounted for this difference with the lowest pCR rates among HR+/HER2- tumors in both ILC and IDC (7 and 5 %, respectively). ILC which were HR- and/or HER2+ had a pCR rate of 25 %. Expression subtyping, particularly the NKI 70-gene signature, was correlated with pCR, although the small numbers of ILC in each group precluded significant associations. BCS rate did not differ between IDC and ILC after adjusting for molecular characteristics. We conclude that ILC represents a heterogeneous group of tumors which are less responsive to NAC than IDC. However, this difference is explained by differences in molecular characteristics, particularly HR and HER2, and independent of lobular histology.

摘要

浸润性小叶癌(ILC)的新辅助化疗(NAC)反应率低于浸润性导管癌(IDC)已有报道。我们旨在通过分析肿瘤特征,如蛋白表达、基因表达和影像学特征,并在调整这些因素后,比较 IDC 的 NAC 反应率,来确定 ILC 组织学是否确实预示着对 NAC 的不良反应。我们合并了两项大型前瞻性 NAC 试验的数据,共纳入 676 例患者,其中 75 例为小叶癌。合格患者的肿瘤直径≥3cm 或有病理证实的阳性淋巴结,并接受了连续活检、表达微阵列分析和 MRI 成像。我们比较了 ILC 和 IDC 的病理完全缓解(pCR)率和保乳手术(BCS)率,并对临床病理因素进行了调整。单因素分析显示,NAC 后 ILC 的 pCR 率明显低于 IDC(11%比 25%,p=0.01)。然而,两种组织学类型之间的肿瘤特征差异,包括激素受体(HR)状态、HER2 状态、组织学分级和 p53 表达,解释了这种差异,两种类型中 HR+/HER2-肿瘤的 pCR 率最低(分别为 7%和 5%)。HR-和/或 HER2+的 ILC 的 pCR 率为 25%。表达亚型,特别是 NKI 70 基因标志物,与 pCR 相关,尽管每组 ILC 的数量较少,无法得出显著关联。在调整分子特征后,IDC 和 ILC 的 BCS 率无差异。我们得出结论,ILC 代表一组异质性肿瘤,对 NAC 的反应性低于 IDC。然而,这种差异是由分子特征的差异解释的,特别是 HR 和 HER2,而与小叶癌组织学无关。

相似文献

1
Lobular histology and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in invasive breast cancer.乳腺浸润性癌的小叶状组织学和新辅助化疗反应。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Nov;136(1):35-43. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-2233-z. Epub 2012 Sep 8.
2
Differences in Response and Surgical Management with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Invasive Lobular Versus Ductal Breast Cancer.浸润性小叶癌与导管癌新辅助化疗的反应及手术管理差异
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Jan;23(1):51-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4603-3. Epub 2015 May 16.
3
Standard Pathologic Features Can Be Used to Identify a Subset of Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2 Negative Patients Likely to Benefit from Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.标准的病理特征可用于识别雌激素受体阳性、HER2 阴性患者亚组,这些患者可能从新辅助化疗中获益。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Sep;24(9):2556-2562. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5898-z. Epub 2017 May 30.
4
Relative effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy for invasive lobular compared with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast.乳腺浸润性小叶癌与浸润性导管癌辅助化疗的相对疗效
Cancer. 2017 Aug 15;123(16):3015-3021. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30699. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
5
Different responses to preoperative chemotherapy for invasive lobular and invasive ductal breast carcinoma.浸润性小叶癌和浸润性导管癌对术前化疗的不同反应。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2003 May;29(4):361-7. doi: 10.1053/ejso.2002.1404.
6
Clinical benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy in oestrogen receptor-positive invasive ductal and lobular carcinomas.新辅助化疗在雌激素受体阳性浸润性导管癌和小叶癌中的临床获益。
Br J Cancer. 2013 Feb 5;108(2):285-91. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.557. Epub 2013 Jan 8.
7
Differences in sensitivity to neoadjuvant chemotherapy among invasive lobular and ductal carcinoma of the breast and implications on surgery-A systematic review and meta-analysis.浸润性小叶癌和导管癌对新辅助化疗敏感性的差异及其对手术的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Breast. 2022 Feb;61:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.11.017. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
8
Long-Term Survival Differences Between T1-2 Invasive Lobular Breast Cancer and Corresponding Ductal Carcinoma After Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Propensity-Scored Matched Longitudinal Cohort Study.保乳手术后 T1-2 浸润性小叶乳腺癌与相应导管癌的长期生存差异:倾向评分匹配的纵向队列研究。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2019 Feb;19(1):e101-e115. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2018.10.010. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
9
Do non-classic invasive lobular carcinomas derive a benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy?非经典型浸润性小叶癌是否从新辅助化疗中获益?
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Jan;197(2):417-423. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06813-y. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
10
Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ductal compared to lobular carcinoma of the breast: a meta-analysis of published trials including 1,764 lobular breast cancer.乳腺导管癌与乳腺小叶癌新辅助化疗反应的比较:包括 1764 例乳腺小叶癌在内的已发表试验的荟萃分析。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Nov;142(2):227-35. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2751-3. Epub 2013 Nov 1.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effect of Blood Selenium Level on the pCR Rate in Breast Cancer Patient Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.血硒水平对接受新辅助化疗的乳腺癌患者病理完全缓解率的影响
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Feb 28;17(5):839. doi: 10.3390/cancers17050839.
2
A pooled analysis evaluating prognostic significance of Residual Cancer Burden in invasive lobular breast cancer.一项评估残余癌负荷在浸润性小叶乳腺癌中的预后意义的汇总分析。
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2025 Feb 13;11(1):14. doi: 10.1038/s41523-025-00720-3.
3
Deciphering the Clinical Behaviour of Invasive Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast Defines an Aggressive Subtype.解读乳腺浸润性小叶癌的临床行为可定义一种侵袭性亚型。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 May 16;16(10):1893. doi: 10.3390/cancers16101893.
4
Pathway-based signatures predict patient outcome, chemotherapy benefit and synthetic lethal dependencies in invasive lobular breast cancer.基于通路的signature 预测浸润性小叶乳腺癌患者的预后、化疗获益和合成致死依赖性。
Br J Cancer. 2024 May;130(11):1828-1840. doi: 10.1038/s41416-024-02679-7. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
5
Breast surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with lobular carcinoma: surgical and oncologic outcome.新辅助化疗后乳腺叶状肿瘤患者的乳腺切除术:手术和肿瘤学结果。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Apr;204(3):497-507. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-07192-8. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
6
Effect of histological breast cancer subtypes invasive lobular versus non-special type on survival in early intermediate-to-high-risk breast carcinoma: results from the SUCCESS trials.早期中高危乳腺癌中组织学乳腺癌亚型浸润性小叶癌与非特殊型对生存的影响:SUCCESS 试验结果。
Breast Cancer Res. 2023 Dec 14;25(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s13058-023-01750-0.
7
Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast: A Comprehensive Review with Translational Insights.乳腺小叶癌:一项具有转化性见解的综合综述
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Nov 20;15(22):5491. doi: 10.3390/cancers15225491.
8
Survival Outcomes in Premenopausal Patients With Invasive Lobular Carcinoma.绝经前浸润性小叶癌患者的生存结局。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Nov 1;6(11):e2342270. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.42270.
9
Change in Main Histological Type of Invasive Breast Cancer From Ductal to Lobular Carcinoma by Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.新辅助化疗导致浸润性乳腺癌主要组织学类型从导管癌转变为小叶癌
Cureus. 2023 Aug 20;15(8):e43816. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43816. eCollection 2023 Aug.
10
Successful Breast Conservation After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Lobular Breast Cancer: The Role of Menopausal Status in Response to Treatment.新辅助化疗后乳腺小叶癌保乳成功:绝经状态对治疗反应的作用。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Nov;30(12):7099-7106. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14075-1. Epub 2023 Aug 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Pathologic complete response predicts recurrence-free survival more effectively by cancer subset: results from the I-SPY 1 TRIAL--CALGB 150007/150012, ACRIN 6657.肿瘤完全缓解通过亚组更有效地预测无复发生存:来自 I-SPY 1 试验——CALGB 150007/150012、ACRIN 6657 的结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Sep 10;30(26):3242-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.2779. Epub 2012 May 29.
2
Chemotherapy response and recurrence-free survival in neoadjuvant breast cancer depends on biomarker profiles: results from the I-SPY 1 TRIAL (CALGB 150007/150012; ACRIN 6657).新辅助乳腺癌的化疗反应和无复发生存率取决于生物标志物谱:来自 I-SPY 1 试验(CALGB 150007/150012;ACRIN 6657)的结果。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Apr;132(3):1049-62. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1895-2. Epub 2011 Dec 25.
3
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy: not the best option in estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, invasive classical lobular carcinoma of the breast?新辅助化疗:对于雌激素受体阳性、人表皮生长因子受体2阴性的浸润性经典型小叶乳腺癌而言,并非最佳选择?
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Aug 1;28(22):3552-4. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.8184. Epub 2010 Jul 6.
4
The relevance of breast cancer subtypes in the outcome of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.乳腺癌亚型与新辅助化疗疗效的相关性。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Sep;17(9):2411-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1008-1. Epub 2010 Apr 6.
5
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy shows similar response in patients with inflammatory or locally advanced breast cancer when compared with operable breast cancer: a secondary analysis of the GeparTrio trial data.新辅助化疗在炎性或局部晚期乳腺癌患者中的反应与可手术乳腺癌相似:GeparTrio 试验数据的二次分析。
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jan 1;28(1):83-91. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.5101. Epub 2009 Nov 9.
6
A simple system for grading the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.一种用于对乳腺癌新辅助化疗反应进行分级的简单系统。
Ann Oncol. 2010 Mar;21(3):481-487. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp348. Epub 2009 Aug 28.
7
Should histologic type be taken into account when considering neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast carcinoma?在考虑对乳腺癌进行新辅助化疗时,是否应考虑组织学类型?
Breast J. 2009 Mar-Apr;15(2):146-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2009.00689.x.
8
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in invasive lobular carcinoma may not improve rates of breast conservation.浸润性小叶癌的新辅助化疗可能无法提高保乳率。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Jun;16(6):1606-11. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0402-z. Epub 2009 Mar 12.
9
The 70-gene signature as a response predictor for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.70 基因标志物作为乳腺癌新辅助化疗反应预测指标。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Feb;119(3):551-8. doi: 10.1007/s10549-009-0333-1. Epub 2009 Feb 13.
10
Supervised risk predictor of breast cancer based on intrinsic subtypes.基于内在亚型的乳腺癌监督风险预测器
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Mar 10;27(8):1160-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.1370. Epub 2009 Feb 9.