• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

标准的病理特征可用于识别雌激素受体阳性、HER2 阴性患者亚组,这些患者可能从新辅助化疗中获益。

Standard Pathologic Features Can Be Used to Identify a Subset of Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2 Negative Patients Likely to Benefit from Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

机构信息

Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Sep;24(9):2556-2562. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5898-z. Epub 2017 May 30.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-017-5898-z
PMID:28560596
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5649343/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancers and in invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is uncertain due to the low rates of pathologic complete response (pCR).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine if pathologic features can identify subsets likely to benefit from NAC.

METHODS

Patients with stage I-III ER+, HER2- breast cancer receiving NAC were retrospectively reviewed. Endpoints were downstaging to breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and nodal pCR after NAC. Patients were grouped by progesterone receptor (PR) status and grade/differentiation (high grade or poor [HP] vs. non-HP).

RESULTS

From 2007 to 2016, 402 ER+/HER2- cancers in patients receiving NAC were identified. Median age was 50 years, 98% were clinical stage II-III, and 75% were cN+. Overall pCR rate was 5%; breast pCR in 7% and nodal pCR in 15% of cN+ patients (p < 0.0001). Patients with ILC initially ineligible for BCS (n = 56) were less likely to downstage than those with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC; n = 183, 16 vs. 48%, p ≤ 0.0001), with a similar trend in the axilla (p = 0.086). The rates of BCS eligibility after NAC were highest in PR-/HP patients (62%) and lowest in PR+/non-HP patients (29%) [p = 0.005]. In the axilla, nodal pCR among cN+ patients (n = 301) ranged from 0 to 35% (p < 0.0001) within these groups, and was most frequent in PR-/HP patients.

CONCLUSIONS

ER+/HER2- patients most likely to benefit from NAC are those with PR- and HP tumors. Patients with ILC are unlikely to downstage in the breast or axilla compared with IDC. The use of these criteria can assist in defining the initial treatment approach.

摘要

背景

由于病理完全缓解(pCR)率较低,新辅助化疗(NAC)在雌激素受体阳性(ER+)/人表皮生长因子受体 2 阴性(HER2-)乳腺癌和浸润性小叶癌(ILC)患者中的获益尚不确定。

目的

本研究旨在确定病理特征是否可以确定可能从 NAC 中获益的亚组。

方法

回顾性分析接受 NAC 的 I-III 期 ER+、HER2-乳腺癌患者。终点是 NAC 后降期为保乳手术(BCS)和淋巴结 pCR。根据孕激素受体(PR)状态和分级/分化(高级别或差[HP]与非-HP)对患者进行分组。

结果

2007 年至 2016 年,共确定了 402 例接受 NAC 的 ER+/HER2-癌症患者。中位年龄为 50 岁,98%为临床 II-III 期,75%为 cN+。总体 pCR 率为 5%;7%的患者出现乳腺 pCR,15%的 cN+患者出现淋巴结 pCR(p<0.0001)。最初不符合 BCS 条件的 ILC 患者(n=56)比浸润性导管癌(IDC;n=183)更不可能降期(16%对 48%,p≤0.0001),腋窝的趋势相似(p=0.086)。NAC 后 BCS 适应证率最高的是 PR-/HP 患者(62%),最低的是 PR+/非-HP 患者(29%)[p=0.005]。在腋窝中,cN+患者(n=301)的淋巴结 pCR 率在这些组内从 0 到 35%(p<0.0001),PR-/HP 患者中最常见。

结论

最有可能从 NAC 中获益的 ER+/HER2-患者是那些具有 PR-和 HP 肿瘤的患者。与 IDC 相比,ILC 患者在乳腺或腋窝降期的可能性较小。这些标准的使用可以帮助确定初始治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Standard Pathologic Features Can Be Used to Identify a Subset of Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2 Negative Patients Likely to Benefit from Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.标准的病理特征可用于识别雌激素受体阳性、HER2 阴性患者亚组,这些患者可能从新辅助化疗中获益。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Sep;24(9):2556-2562. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5898-z. Epub 2017 May 30.
2
Differences in Response and Surgical Management with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Invasive Lobular Versus Ductal Breast Cancer.浸润性小叶癌与导管癌新辅助化疗的反应及手术管理差异
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Jan;23(1):51-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4603-3. Epub 2015 May 16.
3
A Predictive Model for Axillary Node Pathologic Complete Response after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer.乳腺癌新辅助化疗后腋窝淋巴结病理完全缓解的预测模型。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 May;25(5):1304-1311. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6345-5. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
4
Retrospective analysis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer in Turkish patients.土耳其患者乳腺癌新辅助化疗的回顾性分析。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(8):4119-23.
5
Relative effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy for invasive lobular compared with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast.乳腺浸润性小叶癌与浸润性导管癌辅助化疗的相对疗效
Cancer. 2017 Aug 15;123(16):3015-3021. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30699. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
6
[Comparison of histopathologic changes and expression of biomarkers in breast carcinoma before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy].[新辅助化疗前后乳腺癌组织病理学变化及生物标志物表达的比较]
Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 2011 Jul;40(7):465-70.
7
Pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-overexpressing breast cancer according to hormonal receptor status.根据激素受体状态,HER2过表达乳腺癌新辅助化疗后的病理完全缓解情况。
Breast. 2014 Aug;23(4):466-72. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2014.03.008. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
8
Changes in ER, PR and HER2 receptors status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.乳腺癌新辅助化疗后 ER、PR 和 HER2 受体状态的变化。
Pathol Res Pract. 2013 Dec;209(12):797-802. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2013.08.012. Epub 2013 Sep 26.
9
Lobular histology and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in invasive breast cancer.乳腺浸润性癌的小叶状组织学和新辅助化疗反应。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Nov;136(1):35-43. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-2233-z. Epub 2012 Sep 8.
10
The Optimal Treatment Plan to Avoid Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients Differs by Surgical Strategy and Tumor Subtype.早期乳腺癌患者避免腋窝淋巴结清扫的最佳治疗方案因手术策略和肿瘤亚型而异。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Nov;24(12):3527-3533. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-6016-y. Epub 2017 Jul 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Research progress on estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-negative breast cancer.雌激素受体阳性/孕激素受体阴性乳腺癌的研究进展
Transl Oncol. 2025 Jun;56:102387. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2025.102387. Epub 2025 Apr 14.
2
Comparing core needle biopsy and surgical excision in breast cancer diagnosis: implications for clinical practice from a retrospective cohort study.比较粗针穿刺活检与手术切除在乳腺癌诊断中的应用:一项回顾性队列研究对临床实践的启示
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 Dec 5;14(12):8281-8293. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-198. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
3
Prediction of non-sentinel lymph node metastases in T1-2 sentinel lymph node-positive breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy following neoadjuvant therapy.新辅助治疗后行乳房切除术的 T1-2 前哨淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者中非前哨淋巴结转移的预测。
World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Sep 28;22(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03537-9.
4
Use of axillary ultrasound to guide breast cancer management in the genomic assay era.在基因组检测时代,使用腋窝超声引导乳腺癌管理。
Breast Dis. 2024;43(1):19-23. doi: 10.3233/BD-230032.
5
Axillary nodal disease burden is not associated with an elevated 21-gene recurrence score in post-menopausal women presenting with a clinically negative axilla.绝经后临床腋窝阴性的女性,腋窝淋巴结疾病负担与升高的 21 基因复发评分无关。
Am J Surg. 2024 Jul;233:45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.02.005. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
6
Conventional Tools for Predicting Satisfactory Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer Patients.预测HR+/HER2-乳腺癌患者新辅助化疗满意反应的传统工具
Breast Care (Basel). 2023 Oct;18(5):344-353. doi: 10.1159/000531117. Epub 2023 May 20.
7
Nodal pCR and overall survival following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for node positive ER+/Her2- breast cancer.新辅助化疗治疗 ER+/Her2- 阳性乳腺癌伴淋巴结转移患者的淋巴结 pCR 与总生存。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Feb;203(3):419-428. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-07152-2. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
8
Neoadjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer.乳腺癌新辅助全身治疗
Br J Surg. 2023 Jun 12;110(7):765-772. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad103.
9
Do non-classic invasive lobular carcinomas derive a benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy?非经典型浸润性小叶癌是否从新辅助化疗中获益?
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Jan;197(2):417-423. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06813-y. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
10
Molecular Mechanisms of Anti-Estrogen Therapy Resistance and Novel Targeted Therapies.抗雌激素治疗耐药性的分子机制及新型靶向治疗
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Oct 24;14(21):5206. doi: 10.3390/cancers14215206.

本文引用的文献

1
Ki67 Proliferation Index as a Tool for Chemotherapy Decisions During and After Neoadjuvant Aromatase Inhibitor Treatment of Breast Cancer: Results From the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z1031 Trial (Alliance).Ki67增殖指数作为新辅助芳香化酶抑制剂治疗乳腺癌期间及之后化疗决策工具:美国外科医师学会肿瘤学组Z1031试验(联盟)结果
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Apr 1;35(10):1061-1069. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.4406. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
2
Breast conservation following neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer in the modern era: Are we losing the opportunity?现代乳腺癌新辅助治疗后的保乳治疗:我们正在错失良机吗?
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Dec;42(12):1780-1786. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.10.011. Epub 2016 Oct 29.
3
Biomarkers Predicting Pathologic Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer.预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗病理完全缓解的生物标志物
Am J Clin Pathol. 2016 Jun;145(6):871-8. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqw045. Epub 2016 Jun 12.
4
How Often Does Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Avoid Axillary Dissection in Patients With Histologically Confirmed Nodal Metastases? Results of a Prospective Study.对于经组织学证实有淋巴结转移的患者,新辅助化疗能使腋窝淋巴结清扫术避免实施的频率如何?一项前瞻性研究的结果
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Oct;23(11):3467-3474. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5246-8. Epub 2016 May 9.
5
Differences in Response and Surgical Management with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Invasive Lobular Versus Ductal Breast Cancer.浸润性小叶癌与导管癌新辅助化疗的反应及手术管理差异
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Jan;23(1):51-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4603-3. Epub 2015 May 16.
6
Sentinel node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in biopsy-proven node-positive breast cancer: the SN FNAC study.新辅助化疗后活检证实淋巴结阳性乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检:SN FNAC 研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jan 20;33(3):258-64. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.7827. Epub 2014 Dec 1.
7
Tumor biology correlates with rates of breast-conserving surgery and pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: findings from the ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance) Prospective Multicenter Clinical Trial.肿瘤生物学与乳腺癌新辅助化疗后保乳手术和病理完全缓解率相关:来自 ACOSOG Z1071(Alliance)前瞻性多中心临床试验的结果。
Ann Surg. 2014 Oct;260(4):608-14; discussion 614-6. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000924.
8
Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis.乳腺癌的病理完全缓解和长期临床获益:CTNeoBC 汇总分析。
Lancet. 2014 Jul 12;384(9938):164-72. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62422-8. Epub 2014 Feb 14.
9
Response and prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in 1,051 patients with infiltrating lobular breast carcinoma.1051 例浸润性小叶乳腺癌患者新辅助化疗的反应和预后。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014 Feb;144(1):153-62. doi: 10.1007/s10549-014-2861-6. Epub 2014 Feb 7.
10
Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ductal compared to lobular carcinoma of the breast: a meta-analysis of published trials including 1,764 lobular breast cancer.乳腺导管癌与乳腺小叶癌新辅助化疗反应的比较:包括 1764 例乳腺小叶癌在内的已发表试验的荟萃分析。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Nov;142(2):227-35. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2751-3. Epub 2013 Nov 1.