Department of Orthopedics, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, P.R. China.
Int J Mol Med. 2012 Dec;30(6):1327-34. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2012.1123. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
Studies comparing the osteogenic differentiation capacity of human bone marrow-derived stem cells (hBMSCs) and human adipose-derived stem cells (hASCs) cultured in osteogenic differentiation medium have been inconclusive. Apart from chemical stimuli, mechanical stimuli have also been shown to be important in bone tissue engineering, which is referred to as functional bone tissue engineering. hBMSCs and hASCs have been shown to be sensitive to both chemical and mechanical stimuli. In an attempt to find a better seed cell in functional bone tissue engineering, we tried to quantify the osteogenic differentiation capacity of hBMSCs and hASCs under both mechanical and chemical stimuli. In this study, hBMSCs and hASCs were isolated from the same volunteers. Cells were cultured in osteogenic differentiation medium with and without exposure to cyclic tensile stretch (CTS). Quantitative measurement of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity revealed that the osteogenic differentiation capacity of hBMSCs was similar to that of hASCs in the early phase of differentiation in the CTS-stimulated groups. Quantitative measurement of mineralization showed that the late-phase osteogenic differentiation capacity of the hBMSCs was superior to that of hASCs in the CTS-stimulated groups. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis was performed 5 and 10 days after cell culture. The results of the RT-PCR revealed that the osteogenic differentiation capacity of hASCs was inferior to that of hBMSCs both in the CTS-stimulated and unstimulated groups. All the results showed that both hBMSCs and hASCs were sensitive to CTS during the osteogenic differentiation process. This study compared the osteogenic differentiation capacity of hBMSCs and hASCs in response to mechanical stimulations and has important implications for the use of stem cells in functional bone tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.
研究比较了在成骨分化培养基中培养的人骨髓间充质干细胞(hBMSCs)和人脂肪间充质干细胞(hASCs)的成骨分化能力,但结果尚无定论。除了化学刺激外,机械刺激在骨组织工程中也很重要,这被称为功能性骨组织工程。hBMSCs 和 hASCs 对化学和机械刺激都很敏感。为了在功能性骨组织工程中寻找更好的种子细胞,我们试图定量研究 hBMSCs 和 hASCs 在机械和化学刺激下的成骨分化能力。在这项研究中,hBMSCs 和 hASCs 均从同一位志愿者中分离出来。细胞在成骨分化培养基中培养,同时暴露于周期性张应变(CTS)下。碱性磷酸酶(ALP)活性的定量测量结果表明,在 CTS 刺激组中,hBMSCs 的成骨分化能力在分化早期与 hASCs 相似。矿化的定量测量结果表明,在 CTS 刺激组中,hBMSCs 的晚期成骨分化能力优于 hASCs。细胞培养 5 天和 10 天后进行逆转录-聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)分析。RT-PCR 的结果表明,在 CTS 刺激和未刺激组中,hASCs 的成骨分化能力均低于 hBMSCs。所有结果均表明,在成骨分化过程中,hBMSCs 和 hASCs 均对 CTS 敏感。这项研究比较了 hBMSCs 和 hASCs 对机械刺激的成骨分化能力,对于干细胞在功能性骨组织工程和再生医学中的应用具有重要意义。