• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伴有和不伴有非典型导管增生的平坦上皮不典型:再次切除还是不切除。一项 5 年前瞻性研究的结果。

Flat epithelial atypia with and without atypical ductal hyperplasia: to re-excise or not. Results of a 5-year prospective study.

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.

出版信息

Virchows Arch. 2012 Oct;461(4):419-23. doi: 10.1007/s00428-012-1312-1. Epub 2012 Sep 8.

DOI:10.1007/s00428-012-1312-1
PMID:22961104
Abstract

Flat epithelial atypia (FEA) of the breast have a tendency to calcify and, as such, are becoming increasingly detected by mammography. There is no consensus yet on whether to excise these lesions or not after diagnosis on core needle biopsies (CNB). We reviewed 3,948 cases of breast CNB between June 2004 and June 2009 correlating histomorphologic, radiological, and clinical features. There were 3.7 % (145/3,948) pure FEA and 1.5 % (58/3,948) concomitant FEA and atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH). In the pure FEA population, 46.2 % (67/145) had microcalcifications on mammography with 65.5 % (95/145) of patients undergoing subsequent excisional biopsies with the following findings: benign 20 % (19/95), ADH 37.9 % (36/95), ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) 1.1 % (1/95), and DCIS and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) 2.1 % (2/95). In the concomitant FEA and ADH group, 86.2 % (50/58) patients had microcalcifications on radiograph with 74.1 % (43/58) of patients undergoing subsequent excisions with: benign 23.3 % (10/43), DCIS 9.3 % (4/43), DCIS and IDC 4.7 % (2/43), DCIS + lobular carcinoma in situ + invasive lobular carcinoma 2.3 % (1/43), and tubular carcinoma 2.3 % (1/43). The incidence of carcinoma in the FEA + ADH group is 18.6 % (8/43) and 3.2 % (3/95) for the pure FEA group. This difference is statistically significant (p = 0.0016). The relative risk of carcinoma in the ADH + FEA group versus the pure FEA group is 6.4773, with 95 % CI of 1.8432 and 22.76 24. Five-year mean follow-up in the unexcised pure FEA did not show any malignancies. These findings suggest that pure FEA has a very low association with carcinoma, and these patients may benefit from close clinical and mammographic follow-up while the combined pure FEA and ADH cases may be re-excised.

摘要

乳腺的扁平上皮不典型(FEA)有钙化的倾向,因此,越来越多地通过乳房 X 线照相术检测到。对于在核心针活检(CNB)后是否切除这些病变,目前尚无共识。我们回顾了 2004 年 6 月至 2009 年 6 月期间的 3948 例乳腺 CNB 病例,相关的组织形态学、放射学和临床特征。纯 FEA 占 3.7%(145/3948),同时伴有 FEA 和非典型导管增生(ADH)占 1.5%(58/3948)。在纯 FEA 人群中,46.2%(67/145)在乳房 X 线照相术上有微钙化,65.5%(95/145)的患者接受了随后的切除活检,以下是活检结果:良性 20%(19/95)、ADH 37.9%(36/95)、导管原位癌(DCIS)1.1%(1/95)和 DCIS 伴浸润性导管癌(IDC)2.1%(2/95)。在同时伴有 FEA 和 ADH 的人群中,86.2%(50/58)的患者在 X 线照相上有微钙化,74.1%(43/58)的患者接受了随后的切除活检,结果为:良性 23.3%(10/43)、DCIS 9.3%(4/43)、DCIS 伴 IDC 4.7%(2/43)、DCIS+小叶原位癌+浸润性小叶癌 2.3%(1/43)和管状癌 2.3%(1/43)。FEA+ADH 组的癌发生率为 18.6%(8/43),纯 FEA 组为 3.2%(3/95)。这一差异具有统计学意义(p=0.0016)。ADH+FEA 组与纯 FEA 组相比,癌的相对风险为 6.4773,95%置信区间为 1.8432 和 22.76 24。未经切除的纯 FEA 的 5 年平均随访未显示任何恶性肿瘤。这些发现表明,纯 FEA 与癌的相关性非常低,这些患者可能受益于密切的临床和乳房 X 线照相随访,而同时伴有纯 FEA 和 ADH 的病例可能需要再次切除。

相似文献

1
Flat epithelial atypia with and without atypical ductal hyperplasia: to re-excise or not. Results of a 5-year prospective study.伴有和不伴有非典型导管增生的平坦上皮不典型:再次切除还是不切除。一项 5 年前瞻性研究的结果。
Virchows Arch. 2012 Oct;461(4):419-23. doi: 10.1007/s00428-012-1312-1. Epub 2012 Sep 8.
2
Significance of flat epithelial atypia on mammotome core needle biopsy: Should it be excised?乳腺旋切针芯活检中扁平上皮异型增生的意义:是否应将其切除?
Hum Pathol. 2007 Jan;38(1):35-41. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2006.08.008. Epub 2006 Nov 13.
3
Flat epithelial atypia on core needle biopsy does not always mandate excisional biopsy.核心针活检中的扁平上皮不典型增生并非总是需要进行切除术活检。
Breast J. 2020 Apr;26(4):679-684. doi: 10.1111/tbj.13507. Epub 2019 Sep 28.
4
Long term clinical follow-up of atypical ductal hyperplasia and lobular carcinoma in situ in breast core needle biopsies.乳腺粗针活检中非典型导管增生和小叶原位癌的长期临床随访
Pathology. 2016 Jan;48(1):25-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pathol.2015.11.015. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
5
Lobular carcinoma in situ or atypical lobular hyperplasia at core-needle biopsy: is excisional biopsy necessary?粗针活检发现小叶原位癌或非典型小叶增生:是否需要切除活检?
Radiology. 2004 Jun;231(3):813-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2313030874. Epub 2004 Apr 22.
6
Management of high-risk breast lesions diagnosed on core biopsies and experiences from prospective high-risk breast lesion conferences at an academic institution.在学术机构中对核心活检诊断的高危乳腺病变的管理,以及前瞻性高危乳腺病变会议的经验。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Feb;185(3):573-581. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05977-9. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
7
Atypical ductal hyperplasia bordering on DCIS on core biopsy is associated with higher risk of upgrade than conventional atypical ductal hyperplasia.在粗针活检中,与导管原位癌(DCIS)相邻的非典型导管增生比传统的非典型导管增生升级风险更高。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Dec;184(3):873-880. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05890-1. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
8
Pure flat epithelial atypia is uncommon in subsequent breast excisions for atypical epithelial proliferation.单纯扁平上皮不典型增生在后因不典型上皮增生而行的乳腺切除术中并不常见。
Cancer Sci. 2012 Aug;103(8):1580-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2012.02314.x. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
9
Atypical ductal hyperplasia on core biopsy: an automatic trigger for excisional biopsy?核心活检中的非典型导管增生:是否是切除活检的自动触发因素?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Oct;19(10):3264-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2575-0. Epub 2012 Aug 10.
10
Flat epithelial atypia on core needle biopsy, must we surgically excise?粗针活检发现扁平上皮异型增生,我们必须进行手术切除吗?
Am J Surg. 2016 Dec;212(6):1211-1213. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.09.019. Epub 2016 Oct 29.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of delay of excisional biopsy on upstage rate for atypical ductal hyperplasia, flat epithelial atypia, intraductal papilloma, and radial scar.延迟切除术对非典型导管增生、平坦上皮不典型增生、导管内乳头状瘤和放射状瘢痕的升级率的影响。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Dec;196(3):527-534. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06745-7. Epub 2022 Oct 1.
2
Are Columnar Cell Lesions the Earliest Non-Obligate Precursor in the Low-Grade Breast Neoplasia Pathway?柱状细胞病变是否是低级别乳腺肿瘤通路中最早的非必需前体?
Curr Oncol. 2022 Aug 11;29(8):5664-5681. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29080447.
3
Upgrade Rate of Pure Flat Epithelial Atypia Diagnosed at Core Needle Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Pure flat epithelial atypia is uncommon in subsequent breast excisions for atypical epithelial proliferation.单纯扁平上皮不典型增生在后因不典型上皮增生而行的乳腺切除术中并不常见。
Cancer Sci. 2012 Aug;103(8):1580-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2012.02314.x. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
2
All atypia diagnosed at stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy do not need surgical excision.所有在立体定向真空辅助乳腺活检中诊断的非典型病变均不需要手术切除。
Mod Pathol. 2011 Sep;24(9):1198-206. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2011.73. Epub 2011 May 20.
3
Progression risk of columnar cell lesions of the breast diagnosed in core needle biopsies.
在核心针活检中诊断为单纯平坦上皮不典型性的升级率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2021 Jan 22;3(1):e200116. doi: 10.1148/rycan.2021200116. eCollection 2021 Jan.
4
Flat Epithelial Atypia in Breast Core Needle Biopsies With Radiologic-Pathologic Concordance: Is Excision Necessary?乳腺芯针活检中与影像学-病理学一致的平坦上皮不典型性:是否需要切除?
Am J Surg Pathol. 2020 Feb;44(2):182-190. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001385.
5
Flat epithelial atypia: conservative management of patients without residual microcalcifications post-vacuum-assisted breast biopsy.扁平上皮异型增生:真空辅助乳腺活检后无残留微钙化患者的保守治疗
Br J Radiol. 2018 Jan;91(1081):20170484. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170484. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
6
Surgical implications and variability in the use of the flat epithelial atypia diagnosis on breast biopsy specimens.乳腺活检标本中扁平上皮异型增生诊断的手术意义及应用差异
Breast. 2017 Aug;34:34-43. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.04.004. Epub 2017 May 3.
7
Paradigm Shifts in Breast Care Delivery: Impact of Imaging in a Multidisciplinary Environment.乳腺护理模式的转变:多学科环境下影像学的影响
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Feb;208(2):248-255. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.17130. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
8
Upgrade rates of high-risk breast lesions diagnosed on core needle biopsy: a single-institution experience and literature review.在粗针活检中诊断出的高危乳腺病变的升级率:单机构经验及文献综述
Mod Pathol. 2016 Dec;29(12):1471-1484. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2016.127. Epub 2016 Aug 19.
9
Assessment of Breast Specimens With or Without Calcifications in Diagnosing Malignant and Atypia for Mammographic Breast Microcalcifications Without Mass: A STARD-Compliant Diagnostic Accuracy Article.评估有无钙化的乳腺标本在诊断乳腺钼靶微小钙化(无肿块)的恶性及非典型病变中的应用:一篇符合STARD标准的诊断准确性文章。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Oct;94(42):e1832. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001832.
10
Flat epithelial atypia and risk of breast cancer: A Mayo cohort study.扁平上皮异型增生与乳腺癌风险:一项梅奥队列研究。
Cancer. 2015 May 15;121(10):1548-55. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29243. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
在核心针活检中诊断的乳腺柱状细胞病变的进展风险。
Int J Cancer. 2011 Dec 1;129(11):2674-80. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25926. Epub 2011 Mar 25.
4
The molecular pathology of breast cancer progression.乳腺癌进展的分子病理学。
J Pathol. 2011 Jan;223(2):307-17. doi: 10.1002/path.2808. Epub 2010 Nov 16.
5
Flat ductal intraepithelial neoplasia of the breast: evolution of Azzopardi's "clinging" concept.乳腺平坦型导管上皮内肿瘤:Azzopardi 氏“黏附”概念的演变。
Semin Diagn Pathol. 2010 Feb;27(1):37-48. doi: 10.1053/j.semdp.2009.12.005.
6
Flat epithelial atypia on core needle biopsy: which is the right management?核心针活检中的扁平上皮不典型:哪种管理方法是正确的?
Am J Surg Pathol. 2009 Jul;33(7):1078-84. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31819d0a4d.
7
Columnar cell lesions associated with breast calcifications on vacuum-assisted core biopsies: clinical, radiographic, and histological correlations.真空辅助粗针活检中与乳腺钙化相关的柱状细胞病变:临床、影像学和组织学相关性
Mod Pathol. 2009 Jun;22(6):762-9. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2009.21. Epub 2009 Mar 13.
8
Columnar cell lesions of the breast: an update and significance on core biopsy.乳腺柱状细胞病变:核心活检的最新进展及意义
Pathology. 2009 Jan;41(1):18-27. doi: 10.1080/00313020802563486.
9
Are columnar cell lesions the earliest histologically detectable non-obligate precursor of breast cancer?柱状细胞病变是乳腺癌在组织学上可检测到的最早的非必然前驱病变吗?
Virchows Arch. 2008 Jun;452(6):589-98. doi: 10.1007/s00428-008-0609-6. Epub 2008 Apr 24.
10
Flat epithelial atypia of the breast.
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2008 Apr;132(4):615-21. doi: 10.5858/2008-132-615-FEAOTB.