Patel Ketan M, Seruya Mitchel, Franklin Brenton, Attinger Christopher E, Ducic Ivica
Department of Plastic Surgery, School of Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
Ann Plast Surg. 2012 Oct;69(4):399-402. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31824a20f4.
Lower extremity hardware salvage remains challenging in patients with complex comorbidities. The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with failed hardware salvage after microsurgical lower extremity reconstruction.
A retrospective, institutional review board-approved review was performed of patients who underwent lower extremity hardware salvage via free tissue transfer from 2004 to 2010. Outcomes were binarized into successful versus failed hardware salvage, with failure defined as nonelective removal. Patient demographics, wound characteristics, microbiology, and pathology were compared.
Thirty-four patients underwent lower extremity hardware salvage via free tissue transfer, with an average follow-up of 3.2 years (range, 0.3-7.0 years). Of these patients, 15 (44.1%) had successful hardware salvage and 19 (55.9%) required hardware removal. By demographics, a higher prevalence of multiple comorbidities was found in patients with failed hardware salvage. Wound characteristics revealed a significantly longer time to hardware coverage and longer duration of intravenous antibiotics in failed versus successful hardware salvage patients (38.9 vs 9.3 weeks, P=0.02; 6.5 vs 4.1 weeks, P=0.03, respectively). Initial wound cultures demonstrated a significantly higher frequency of positive growth in patients with failed versus successful hardware salvage (100.0% vs 57.1%, P=0.003). Initial pathology revealed a borderline-significantly higher frequency of chronic osteomyelitis in failed versus successful salvage patients (66.7% vs 33.3%, P=0.08).
In this retrospective review of microsurgical lower extremity reconstruction, factors associated with failed hardware salvage included multiple comorbidities, longer time to hardware coverage, increased duration of intravenous antibiotics, positive initial wound cultures, and chronic osteomyelitis on initial pathology.
对于合并复杂疾病的患者,下肢内固定物挽救手术仍具有挑战性。本研究的目的是确定与显微外科下肢重建术后内固定物挽救失败相关的因素。
对2004年至2010年期间接受游离组织移植进行下肢内固定物挽救手术的患者进行了一项经机构审查委员会批准的回顾性研究。结果分为内固定物挽救成功与失败,失败定义为非选择性取出。比较了患者的人口统计学特征、伤口特征、微生物学和病理学情况。
34例患者通过游离组织移植进行下肢内固定物挽救手术,平均随访3.2年(范围0.3 - 7.0年)。其中,15例(44.1%)内固定物挽救成功,19例(55.9%)需要取出内固定物。在人口统计学方面,内固定物挽救失败的患者中多种合并症的患病率更高。伤口特征显示,与内固定物挽救成功的患者相比,失败患者达到内固定物覆盖的时间明显更长,静脉使用抗生素的时间也更长(分别为38.9周对9.3周,P = 0.02;6.5周对4.1周,P = 0.03)。初始伤口培养显示,内固定物挽救失败的患者阳性生长频率明显高于成功患者(100.0%对57.1%,P = 0.003)。初始病理学显示,内固定物挽救失败的患者慢性骨髓炎的频率略高于成功患者(66.7%对33.3%,P = 0.08)。
在这项对显微外科下肢重建的回顾性研究中,与内固定物挽救失败相关的因素包括多种合并症、达到内固定物覆盖的时间更长、静脉使用抗生素的时间增加、初始伤口培养阳性以及初始病理学显示慢性骨髓炎。