Haimovici Ludmila, Papafragkou Sotirios, Lee Wei, Dagum Alexander, Hurst Lawrence C
Department of Orthopaedics, Hand Surgery, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark, NJ, USA.
Ann Plast Surg. 2012 Oct;69(4):468-70. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31824a212a.
Suture technique, suture material, and the number of strands all play critical roles in achieving optimal strength of flexor tendon repairs. We evaluated the contribution to the tensile strength of flexor tendon repair using the strongest suture material, Fiberwire, and the best surgical technique (locking configuration) using 2- and 4-strand core repair to see what factor played the most important role in tendon repair.
Human cadaver flexor tendons were harvested and repaired in a randomized fashion using locking configuration as derived from Pennington's report. Ten tendons per group were repaired using either 4-0 Fiberloop, 4-0 Fiberwire, or 2-0 Fiberwire. During load-to-failure testing, visible gap force and maximum tensile strength were statistically analyzed.
All flexor tendon repairs failed by suture pullout. The 4-strand 4-0 Fiberwire double-Pennington repair was found to be significantly stronger than the 4-strand 4-0 Fiberloop single-Pennington repair. When the 2-strand repair (2-0 Fiberwire) was compared to the 4-strand single-Pennington repair (4-0 Fiberloop), there was no significant difference found.
The suture strand configuration rather than the strict number of strands or the strength of the suture material yielded the maximum tensile strength with reduced gapping at the repair site.
缝合技术、缝合材料及缝线股数在实现屈指肌腱修复的最佳强度方面均起着关键作用。我们使用最强的缝合材料Fiberwire以及最佳手术技术(锁定构型),采用2股和4股核心修复来评估其对屈指肌腱修复抗张强度的贡献,以确定在肌腱修复中哪个因素起最重要作用。
采集人类尸体的屈指肌腱,按照Pennington报告中的锁定构型随机进行修复。每组10根肌腱分别使用4-0 Fiberloop、4-0 Fiberwire或2-0 Fiberwire进行修复。在破坏载荷测试过程中,对可见间隙力和最大抗张强度进行统计学分析。
所有屈指肌腱修复均因缝线拔出而失败。发现4股4-0 Fiberwire双Pennington修复明显强于4股4-0 Fiberloop单Pennington修复。当将2股修复(2-0 Fiberwire)与4股单Pennington修复(4-0 Fiberloop)进行比较时,未发现显著差异。
缝线股构型而非严格的股数或缝合材料的强度产生了最大抗张强度,且修复部位的间隙减小。