Suppr超能文献

开胸心脏复苏。外科医生的观点。

Open cardiac resuscitation. A surgeon's viewpoint.

作者信息

Blakeman B

机构信息

Loyola University Medical Center, Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois.

出版信息

Postgrad Med. 1990 Jan;87(1):247-8, 251, 253. doi: 10.1080/00325481.1990.11704536.

Abstract

Open cardiac massage yields better hemodynamic results in the laboratory than does closed cardiac massage. However, reported survival rates with the two methods are similar, except in postcardiotomy patients and patients with penetrating injury. Implementation of resuscitation within several minutes of cardiac arrest is far more important than the specific method used. Closed cardiac massage can be instituted more universally and more quickly than open massage and thus should remain the mainstay of cardiac resuscitation. Open cardiac massage can be performed by trained surgical personnel in appropriate situations.

摘要

在实验室中,开胸心脏按压比闭胸心脏按压能产生更好的血流动力学效果。然而,除了心脏手术后患者和穿透伤患者外,两种方法报告的生存率相似。心脏骤停后几分钟内实施复苏远比所使用的具体方法重要得多。闭胸心脏按压比开胸按压更普遍、更迅速地实施,因此应仍然是心脏复苏的主要方法。开胸心脏按压可由经过培训的外科人员在适当情况下进行。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验