Seeberg E, Fuchs R P
Division for Environmental Toxicology, Norwegian Defence Research Establishment, Kjeller, Norway.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Jan;87(1):191-4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.1.191.
DNA fragments were constructed in which acetylaminofluorene adducts were introduced specifically at each one of the three different guanines of the 6-base-pair sequence -GGCGCC-. Incubation of the DNA with the UvrABC excision nuclease in vitro revealed major differences in the efficiency of adduct excision depending on the site of modification. Oligonucleotide excision of adducts bound to the second guanine was only 15% as efficient as excision of adducts at the first guanine, whereas the excision efficiency for adducts bound to the third guanine was intermediary. However, recognition of DNA damage appeared to occur with nearly 100% efficiency at all three adduct positions, as judged from DNase I footprint analysis of the DNA/protein binding complexes. Hence, it appears that the structural elements for DNA damage recognition by the UvrABC enzyme are different from the signals for excision. Furthermore, the repair pattern observed is not inversely correlated with the potential of these adducts to induce mutations since mutation analysis of single-adduct DNA has shown that only adducts at the third guanine are strongly premutagenic. We conclude that the effectiveness of excision repair depends on the context of the DNA sequence and that ineffectively repaired adduct sites are not necessarily mutational hot spots.
构建了DNA片段,其中在6个碱基对序列-GGCGCC-的三个不同鸟嘌呤中的每一个上特异性引入了乙酰氨基芴加合物。体外将DNA与UvrABC切除核酸酶一起孵育,结果显示根据修饰位点的不同,加合物切除效率存在重大差异。与第二个鸟嘌呤结合的加合物的寡核苷酸切除效率仅为与第一个鸟嘌呤结合的加合物切除效率的15%,而与第三个鸟嘌呤结合的加合物的切除效率处于中间水平。然而,根据DNA/蛋白质结合复合物的DNase I足迹分析判断,在所有三个加合物位置对DNA损伤的识别效率似乎都接近100%。因此,似乎UvrABC酶识别DNA损伤的结构元件与切除信号不同。此外,观察到的修复模式与这些加合物诱导突变的潜力并非呈负相关,因为单加合物DNA的突变分析表明只有第三个鸟嘌呤处的加合物具有强烈的前诱变作用。我们得出结论,切除修复的有效性取决于DNA序列的背景,并且修复无效的加合物位点不一定是突变热点。