Suppr超能文献

生物瓣主动脉瓣置换术后的脑微栓塞:华法林加阿司匹林与仅用阿司匹林的比较。

Cerebral microembolization after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement: comparison of warfarin plus aspirin versus aspirin only.

机构信息

Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.

出版信息

Circulation. 2012 Sep 11;126(11 Suppl 1):S239-44. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.084772.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

No human physiological data exists on whether aspirin only is as effective as warfarin plus aspirin in preventing cerebral microembolization in the early postoperative period after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement (bAVR).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We prospectively enrolled 56 patients who had no other indication for oral anticoagulation, who underwent bAVR and received, in an open-label fashion, either daily warfarin (for INR 2.0-3.0) plus 81 mg of aspirin (n=28) or 325 mg of aspirin only (n=28). Cerebral microembolization was quantified at 4 hours (baseline) and at 1 month postoperatively, by recording 1-hour bilateral middle cerebral artery (MCA) microembolic signals (MES). Platelet-function analysis (PFA) of closure times (CT) on collagen was also used as a marker of platelet-dependent activation. Follow-up to 1 year was complete. Preoperative demographics and baseline platelet function were equivalent in both groups. There was no mortality, stroke, or transient ischemic attack at 1 year in either group. No significant differences were found in the proportion of patients with MES among those receiving warfarin plus aspirin versus aspirin only, at baseline (68% versus 82%, respectively; P=0.4) and at 1 month (46% versus 43%; P=1.0) after bAVR. The total MES and PFA were also equivalent between groups, at baseline and follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Early after bAVR, the effects of these 2 antithrombotic regimens on cerebral microembolization and platelet function are equivalent. These data bring new mechanistic support to the premise that aspirin only may safely be used early after bAVR in patients who have no other indication for oral anticoagulation.

摘要

背景

尚无人类生理数据表明,在生物瓣主动脉瓣置换术(bAVR)后早期,仅使用阿司匹林是否与华法林加阿司匹林一样有效预防脑微栓塞。

方法和结果

我们前瞻性纳入了 56 名无其他口服抗凝指征、接受 bAVR 并接受开放标签治疗的患者,每日接受华法林(INR 2.0-3.0)加 81mg 阿司匹林(n=28)或仅 325mg 阿司匹林(n=28)。通过记录 1 小时双侧大脑中动脉(MCA)微栓塞信号(MES),在术后 4 小时(基线)和 1 个月时量化脑微栓塞。胶原诱导的血小板功能分析(PFA)的闭合时间(CT)也被用作血小板依赖性激活的标志物。随访至 1 年。两组患者术前人口统计学特征和基线血小板功能均无差异。两组均无 1 年死亡、卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作。华法林加阿司匹林组与阿司匹林组患者基线时(分别为 68%和 82%;P=0.4)和 bAVR 后 1 个月(分别为 46%和 43%;P=1.0)MES 患者的比例无显著差异。基线和随访时两组间总 MES 和 PFA 也相当。

结论

bAVR 后早期,这两种抗栓方案对脑微栓塞和血小板功能的影响相当。这些数据为仅使用阿司匹林在无其他口服抗凝指征的患者 bAVR 后早期安全使用的前提提供了新的机制支持。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验