Riaz Haris, Alansari Shehab Ahmad Redha, Khan Muhammad Shahzeb, Riaz Talha, Raza Sajjad, Luni Faraz Khan, Khan Abdur Rahman, Riaz Irbaz Bin, Krasuski Richard A
From the Department of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, OH (H.R., S.A.R.A.); Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH (S.A.R.A., S.R.); Department of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan (M.S.K.); Department of Internal Medicine, Bronx Lebanon Hospital, New York, NY (T.R.); Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mercy Saint Vincent Medical Center, Toledo, OH (F.K.L.); Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Louisville, KY (A.R.K.); Department of Internal Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson (I.B.R.); and Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC (R.A.K.).
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016 May;9(3):294-302. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002696. Epub 2016 May 10.
The American College of Cardiology guidelines recommend 3 months of anticoagulation after replacement of the aortic valve with a bioprosthesis. However, there remains great variability in the current clinical practice and conflicting results from clinical studies. To assist clinical decision making, we pooled the existing evidence to assess whether anticoagulation in the setting of a new bioprosthesis was associated with improved outcomes or greater risk of bleeding.
We searched the PubMed database from the inception of these databases until April 2015 to identify original studies (observational studies or clinical trials) that assessed anticoagulation with warfarin in comparison with either aspirin or no antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy. We included the studies if their outcomes included thromboembolism or stroke/transient ischemic attacks and bleeding events. Quality assessment was performed in accordance with the Newland Ottawa Scale, and random effects analysis was used to pool the data from the available studies. I(2) testing was done to assess the heterogeneity of the included studies. After screening through 170 articles, a total of 13 studies (cases=6431; controls=18210) were included in the final analyses. The use of warfarin was associated with a significantly increased risk of overall bleeding (odds ratio, 1.96; 95% confidence interval, 1.25-3.08; P<0.0001) or bleeding risk at 3 months (odds ratio, 1.92; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-3.34; P<0.0001) compared with aspirin or placebo. With regard to composite primary outcome variables (risk of venous thromboembolism, stroke, or transient ischemic attack) at 3 months, no significant difference was seen with warfarin (odds ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-1.56; P=0.67). Moreover, anticoagulation was also not shown to improve outcomes at time interval >3 months (odds ratio, 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-1.58; P=0.79).
Contrary to the current guidelines, a meta-analysis of previous studies suggests that anticoagulation in the setting of an aortic bioprosthesis significantly increases bleeding risk without a favorable effect on thromboembolic events. Larger, randomized controlled studies should be performed to further guide this clinical practice.
美国心脏病学会指南推荐,生物瓣置换主动脉瓣后需进行3个月的抗凝治疗。然而,目前临床实践中仍存在很大差异,临床研究结果也相互矛盾。为辅助临床决策,我们汇总现有证据,以评估新型生物瓣抗凝治疗是否能改善预后或增加出血风险。
我们检索了PubMed数据库自创建至2015年4月期间的文献,以确定评估华法林抗凝治疗与阿司匹林或不进行抗血小板或抗凝治疗相比的原始研究(观察性研究或临床试验)。若这些研究的结局包括血栓栓塞、卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作以及出血事件,则纳入研究。根据纽卡斯尔渥太华量表进行质量评估,并采用随机效应分析汇总现有研究的数据。通过I²检验评估纳入研究的异质性。在筛选了170篇文章后,最终分析共纳入13项研究(病例=6431;对照=18210)。与阿司匹林或安慰剂相比,使用华法林会显著增加总体出血风险(比值比,1.96;95%置信区间,1.25 - 3.08;P<0.0001)或3个月时的出血风险(比值比,1.92;95%置信区间,1.10 - 3.34;P<0.0001)。关于3个月时的复合主要结局变量(静脉血栓栓塞、卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作风险),华法林组未见显著差异(比值比,1.13;95%置信区间,0.82 - 1.56;P = 0.67)。此外,抗凝治疗在>3个月的时间间隔内也未显示能改善预后(比值比,1.12;95%置信区间,0.80 - 1.58;P = 0.79)。
与当前指南相反,对既往研究的荟萃分析表明,主动脉生物瓣抗凝治疗会显著增加出血风险,而对血栓栓塞事件无有益影响。应开展更大规模的随机对照研究以进一步指导这一临床实践。