Suppr超能文献

多西他赛联合卡铂对比EC-T方案作为三阴性乳腺癌辅助化疗的疗效:一项III期随机开放标签试验的安全性数据

[Docetaxel plus carboplatin versus EC-T as adjuvant chemotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer: safety data from a phase III randomized open-label trial].

作者信息

Yuan Peng, Xu Bing-he, Wang Jia-yu, Ma Fei, Li Qing, Zhang Pin, Fan Ying, Li Qiao, Wang Wen-miao

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2012 Jun;34(6):465-8. doi: 10. 3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2012.06.014.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Triple-negative [estrogen receptor (ER)-/progesterone receptor (PR)-/HER2-] breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for ∼ 15% of overall breast cancer and associated with a poor prognosis. There is a short of standard adjuvant chemotherapy regimens for TNBC. A number of studies have shown that TNBC might be sensitive to cisplatin and carboplatin on the basis that dysfunction of BRCA1 and its pathway is associated with a specific DNA-repair defect, but data of adjuvant setting about this is limited.

METHODS

From January 2010 to September 2011, 95 early triple-negative breast cancer patients confirmed by pathology were randomly assigned to receive TP (docetaxel 75 mg/m², carboplatin AUC = 5, day 1, 21 days a cycle for 6 cycles) or EC-T (epirubicin 90 mg/m², cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m², d1, 21 days a cycle for 4 cycles, followed by docetaxel 80 mg/m², d1, 21 days a cycle for 4 cycles) chemotherapy. Adjuvant radiation therapy was given selectively after chemotherapy. Here we report a preliminary safety analysis with the chi-square test.

RESULTS

Seventy-six out of the 95 patients had completed the chemotherapy and could be assessed for the safety profiles of the regimens. Thirty-seven of them were in the EC-T group with a median age of 47 years, and 21 out of these 37 patients were premenopausal (56.8%). Another 39 patients came from the TP group with a median age of 46 years, and 22 out of these 39 patients were premenopausal (56.4%). All of the 37 patients in EC-T group completed the planned treatment whereas 2 patients of the 39 cases in TP group did not because of bone marrow suppression. During the treatments, 9 patients had dose adjustment in each group. Adverse events of grade 1/2 were common. Specific incidence of adverse events with grade 3/4 in each group was as follows: alopecia, 29.7% vs. 10.3% (P = 0.033), vomiting 21.6% vs. 7.7% (P = 0.085), leukopenia 54.1% vs.25.6% (P = 0.011) and neutropenia 51.4% vs. 35.9% (P = 0.174). Other grade 3/4 toxicities were rare. All the adverse events (except peripheral neuropathy and pigmentation) recovered within 1 month after the chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Both EC-T and TP regimens as adjuvant chemotherapy are safe and tolerable for the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer patients, while the TP regimen has advantages with less grade III/IV alopecia and leukopenia.

摘要

目的

三阴性[雌激素受体(ER)-/孕激素受体(PR)-/HER2-]乳腺癌(TNBC)约占所有乳腺癌的15%,且预后较差。目前TNBC缺乏标准的辅助化疗方案。多项研究表明,由于BRCA1及其通路功能障碍与特定的DNA修复缺陷相关,TNBC可能对顺铂和卡铂敏感,但关于这两种药物辅助治疗的相关数据有限。

方法

2010年1月至2011年9月,95例经病理确诊的早期三阴性乳腺癌患者被随机分配接受TP方案(多西他赛75mg/m²,卡铂AUC=5,第1天给药,每21天1个周期,共6个周期)或EC-T方案(表柔比星90mg/m²,环磷酰胺600mg/m²,第1天给药,每21天1个周期,共4个周期,随后多西他赛80mg/m²,第1天给药,每21天1个周期,共4个周期)化疗。化疗后选择性给予辅助放疗。本文通过卡方检验报告了一项初步安全性分析。

结果

95例患者中有76例完成化疗,可对方案的安全性进行评估。其中37例在EC-T组,中位年龄47岁,37例中有21例为绝经前患者(56.8%)。另外39例来自TP组,中位年龄46岁,39例中有22例为绝经前患者(56.4%)。EC-T组的37例患者均完成了计划治疗,而TP组的39例中有2例因骨髓抑制未完成治疗。治疗期间,每组有9例患者进行了剂量调整。1/2级不良事件较为常见。每组3/4级不良事件的具体发生率如下:脱发,29.7%对10.3%(P=0.033);呕吐,21.6%对7.7%(P=0.085);白细胞减少,54.1%对25.6%(P=0.011);中性粒细胞减少,51.4%对35.9%(P=0.174)。其他3/4级毒性反应罕见。所有不良事件(外周神经病变和色素沉着除外)在化疗后1个月内恢复。

结论

EC-T和TP方案作为辅助化疗治疗三阴性乳腺癌患者均安全且耐受性良好,而TP方案在III/IV级脱发和白细胞减少方面具有优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验