Duman Berna Bozkurt, Afşar Çiğdem Usul, Günaldi Meral, Sahin Berksoy, Kara I Oguz, Erkisi Melek, Erçolak Vehbi
Adana Training and Research Hospital, Department of Oncology, Adana, Turkey.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(8):4119-23.
Neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy is the accepted approach for women with locally advanced breast cancer. Anthracycline- and taxane-based regimens have been extensively studied in clinical trials and consequently are widely used. In this study aimed to research the complete response (pCR) rates in different regimens for neoadjuvant setting and determine associated clinical and biological factors.
This study included 63 patients diagnosed with breast carcinoma among 95 patients that had been treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy between 2007 and 2010. TNM staging system was used for staging. The histologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy was characterized as a pCR when there was no evidence of residual invasive tumor in the breast or axillary lymph nodes. Biologic subclassification using estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), HER2 were performed. Luminal A was defined as ER+, PR+, HER2-; Luminal B tumor was defined as ER+, PR-, HER2-; ER+, PR-, HER2+; ER-, PR+, HER2-; ER+, PR+, HER2+, HER2 like tumor ER-, PR+, HER2+; and triple negative tumor ER, PR, HER2 negative.
Patients median age was 54.14 (min-max: 30-75). Thirty-two patients (50.8%) were premenopausal and 31 (49.2%) were postmenopausal. Staging was performed postoperatively based on the pathology report and appropriated imaging modalities The TNM (tumor, lymph node, metastasis) system was used for clinical and pathological staging. Fifty-seven (90.5%) were invasive ductal carcinomas, 6 (9.5%) were other subtypes. Thirty nine (61.9%) were grade II and 24 (38.1%) were grade III. Seven (11.1%) patients were stage II and 56 (88.9) patients were stage III. The patients were classified for ER, PR receptor and HER2 positivity. Seventeen patients had complete response to chemotherapy. Forty patients (63.5%) were treated with dose dense regimen (cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 and doxorubicine 60 mg/m every two weeks than paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 every two weeks with filgrastim support) 40 patients (48%) were treated anthracycline and taxane containing regimens. Thirteen patients (76%) from 17 patients with pCR were treated with the dose dense regimen but without statistical significance (p=0.06). pCR was higher in HER2(-), ER(-), grade III, premenopausal patients.
pCR rate was higher in the group that treated with dose dense regimen, which should thus be the selected regimen in neoadjuvant setting. Some other factors can predict pCR in Turkish patients, like grade, menopausal status, triple negativity, percentage of ER positivity, and HER2 expression.
新辅助全身化疗是局部晚期乳腺癌女性患者公认的治疗方法。基于蒽环类和紫杉类的方案已在临床试验中得到广泛研究,因此被广泛应用。本研究旨在探讨新辅助治疗中不同方案的完全缓解(pCR)率,并确定相关的临床和生物学因素。
本研究纳入了2007年至2010年间接受新辅助化疗的95例患者中的63例乳腺癌患者。采用TNM分期系统进行分期。当乳腺或腋窝淋巴结中无残留浸润性肿瘤证据时,新辅助化疗的组织学反应被定义为pCR。使用雌激素受体(ER)、孕激素受体(PR)、HER2进行生物学亚分类。Luminal A定义为ER+、PR+、HER2-;Luminal B肿瘤定义为ER+、PR-、HER2-;ER+、PR-、HER2+;ER-、PR+、HER2-;ER+、PR+、HER2+;HER2样肿瘤ER-、PR+、HER2+;三阴性肿瘤ER、PR、HER2均为阴性。
患者的中位年龄为54.14岁(最小-最大:30-75岁)。32例患者(50.8%)为绝经前,31例患者(49.2%)为绝经后。术后根据病理报告和适当的影像学检查进行分期。采用TNM(肿瘤、淋巴结、转移)系统进行临床和病理分期。57例(90.5%)为浸润性导管癌,6例(9.5%)为其他亚型。39例(61.9%)为II级,24例(38.1%)为III级。7例(11.1%)患者为II期,56例(88.9%)患者为III期。对患者进行ER、PR受体和HER2阳性分类。17例患者化疗后完全缓解。40例患者(63.5%)接受剂量密集方案治疗(环磷酰胺600mg/m²和多柔比星60mg/m每两周一次,随后紫杉醇175mg/m²每两周一次并给予非格司亭支持),40例患者(48%)接受含蒽环类和紫杉类的方案治疗。17例pCR患者中有13例(76%)接受剂量密集方案治疗,但无统计学意义(p=0.06)。HER2(-)、ER(-)、III级、绝经前患者的pCR率较高。
接受剂量密集方案治疗的组pCR率较高,因此应作为新辅助治疗的首选方案。一些其他因素可预测土耳其患者的pCR,如分级、绝经状态、三阴性、ER阳性百分比和HER2表达。