• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

四种自膨胀镍钛诺裸支架体外可视性比较。

Comparison of visibility for four self-expanding nitinol bare stents in vitro.

作者信息

Wiesinger Benjamin, Stütz Alexander, Schmehl Jörg, Groezinger Gerd, Claussen Claus Detlef, Wiskirchen Jakub

机构信息

Division of Diagnostic Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Tübingen, Bielefeld, Germany.

出版信息

Acta Radiol. 2012 Nov 1;53(9):1020-5. doi: 10.1258/ar.2012.120187. Epub 2012 Sep 11.

DOI:10.1258/ar.2012.120187
PMID:22969090
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sufficient radiopacity of stents is a prerequisite for safe interventions and minimization of the radiation dose for the patient and the interventionist. Modern nitinol stents are considered less radiopaque compared to formerly used stents.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the objective detection rate (ODR) and the subjective radiopacity score (SRS) of four self-expanding nitinol stents with their markers on a phantom human pelvis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We evaluated the ODR (as a percentage of correctly identified stents) and the SRS (on a scale from 0 = not visible to 4 = excellent visibility) for four self-expanding nitinol stents (SinusSuperflex, SMART, Luminexx, Zilver) with 8 mm diameter and 40 mm length. Stents were placed on a phantom human pelvis and images of the stents were taken in four different positions (right and left lumbosacral joint and near the right and left limbus acetabuli) using the following modes: spotfilm, pulsed fluoroscopy (4, 7.5, 15, and 30 pulses/min) and at three different digital magnification modes. Dose area products (DAPs) were assessed.

RESULTS

ODR and SRS, respectively, were significantly increased for the SMART stent compared to all other tested stents (P < 0.05): SMART 93.53% and 2.43, SinusSuperflex 90.81% and 2.21, Luminexx 90.39% and 2.20, and Zilver 89.28% and 2.21. ODR was significantly reduced in position 3 where the bone overlap was more pronounced for all stents (detection rates 77.14-79.56%). An increase in magnification significantly improved the ODR and SRS for all stents (70.33-99.25% and 1.07-3.28, respectively, P < 0.05). Increased pulsing frequency did not improve the ODR of the various stents but did increase the DAP.

CONCLUSION

The SMART stent had the best overall performance. In the presence of bone overlap, all self-expanding nitinol stents had poor results. Increased pulsing frequency did not improve ODR or SRS but did increase the DAP. Use of digital magnification modes had no effect on DAP increasing ODR and SRS.

摘要

背景

支架具有足够的射线不透性是安全干预以及将患者和介入医生所受辐射剂量降至最低的前提条件。与以前使用的支架相比,现代镍钛诺支架的射线不透性被认为较低。

目的

评估四种带有标记物的自膨胀镍钛诺支架在人体骨盆模型上的客观检测率(ODR)和主观射线不透性评分(SRS)。

材料与方法

我们评估了四种直径8毫米、长度40毫米的自膨胀镍钛诺支架(SinusSuperflex、SMART、Luminexx、Zilver)的ODR(正确识别支架的百分比)和SRS(评分范围从0 = 不可见至4 = 可视性极佳)。将支架放置在人体骨盆模型上,并使用以下模式在四个不同位置(左右腰骶关节以及左右髋臼缘附近)拍摄支架图像:点片、脉冲透视(4、7.5、15和30脉冲/分钟)以及三种不同的数字放大模式。评估剂量面积乘积(DAP)。

结果

与所有其他测试支架相比,SMART支架的ODR和SRS分别显著提高(P < 0.05):SMART支架的ODR为93.53%,SRS为2.43;SinusSuperflex支架的ODR为90.81%,SRS为2.21;Luminexx支架的ODR为90.39%,SRS为2.20;Zilver支架的ODR为89.28%,SRS为2.21。在位置3,所有支架的骨骼重叠更为明显,ODR显著降低(检测率77.14 - 79.56%)。放大倍数增加显著提高了所有支架的ODR和SRS(分别为70.33 - 99.25%和1.07 - 3.28,P < 0.05)。脉冲频率增加并未改善各种支架的ODR,但确实增加了DAP。

结论

SMART支架总体性能最佳。在存在骨骼重叠的情况下,所有自膨胀镍钛诺支架的效果都较差。脉冲频率增加并未改善ODR或SRS,但增加了DAP。使用数字放大模式对增加ODR和SRS的DAP没有影响。

相似文献

1
Comparison of visibility for four self-expanding nitinol bare stents in vitro.四种自膨胀镍钛诺裸支架体外可视性比较。
Acta Radiol. 2012 Nov 1;53(9):1020-5. doi: 10.1258/ar.2012.120187. Epub 2012 Sep 11.
2
Comparison of digital flat-panel detector and conventional angiography machines: evaluation of stent detection rates, visibility scores, and dose-area products.数字平板探测器与常规血管造影机的比较:支架检出率、可视性评分和剂量面积产品的评估。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Apr;198(4):946-54. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.7245.
3
Radiopacity of current endovascular stents: evaluation in a multiple reader phantom study.当前血管内支架的射线不透性:在一项多观察者体模研究中的评估
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2004 Aug;15(8):843-52. doi: 10.1097/01.RVI.0000136985.06722.AD.
4
Radiopaque markers in endovascular stents--benefit and potential hazards.血管内支架中的不透射线标记物——益处与潜在危害。
Rofo. 2003 Apr;175(4):484-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-38439.
5
Performance characteristics of modern self-expanding nitinol stents indicated for SFA.用于股浅动脉的现代自膨式镍钛合金支架的性能特征
Rofo. 2011 Sep;183(9):818-25. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1273445. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
6
[In vitro examination of the visibility of 11 stent catheters with real-time MR imaging].[11种支架导管在实时磁共振成像下可视性的体外检查]
Rofo. 2004 Sep;176(9):1311-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-813402.
7
Primary patency of femoropopliteal arteries treated with nitinol versus stainless steel self-expanding stents: propensity score-adjusted analysis.镍钛诺与不锈钢自膨式支架治疗股腘动脉的初始通畅率:倾向评分调整分析
Radiology. 2004 Aug;232(2):516-21. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2322031345.
8
Comparison of a microporous thermoplastic polyurethane-covered stent with a self-expanding bare nitinol stent in a porcine iliac artery model.在猪髂动脉模型中,微孔热塑性聚氨酯涂层支架与自膨胀裸镍钛诺支架的比较。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009 Jul;20(7):927-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2009.04.044. Epub 2009 Jun 4.
9
[Performance characteristics of self-expanding peripheral nitinol stents].[自膨式外周镍钛诺支架的性能特征]
Rofo. 2009 Jun;181(6):579-86. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1109108. Epub 2009 Apr 7.
10
Drug-eluting and bare nitinol stents for the treatment of atherosclerotic lesions in the superficial femoral artery: long-term results from the SIROCCO trial.药物洗脱和裸镍钛合金支架治疗股浅动脉粥样硬化病变:SIROCCO试验的长期结果
J Endovasc Ther. 2006 Dec;13(6):701-10. doi: 10.1583/05-1704.1.