• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluation of microsatellite instability in women with epithelial ovarian cancer.上皮性卵巢癌女性患者微卫星不稳定性的评估
Oncol Lett. 2012 Sep;4(3):556-560. doi: 10.3892/ol.2012.776. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
2
Sensitivity and polymorphism of Bethesda panel markers in Chinese population.中国人群中贝塞斯达检测指标的敏感性和多态性
Bull Cancer. 2020 Nov;107(11):1091-1097. doi: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2020.08.001. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
3
Application of the National Cancer Institute international criteria for determination of microsatellite instability in ovarian cancer.美国国立癌症研究所国际标准在卵巢癌微卫星不稳定性判定中的应用。
Cancer Res. 2001 Jun 1;61(11):4371-4.
4
Incidence of microsatellite instability in synchronous tumors of the ovary and endometrium.卵巢和子宫内膜同步肿瘤中微卫星不稳定性的发生率。
Clin Cancer Res. 2003 Apr;9(4):1387-92.
5
Microsatellite instability--MSI markers (BAT26, BAT25, D2S123, D5S346, D17S250) in rectal cancer.直肠癌中的微卫星不稳定性——MSI标志物(BAT26、BAT25、D2S123、D5S346、D17S250)
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2012 Oct-Dec;25(4):240-4. doi: 10.1590/s0102-67202012000400006.
6
Microsatellite instability and mismatch repair protein defects in ovarian epithelial neoplasms in patients 50 years of age and younger.50岁及以下患者卵巢上皮性肿瘤中的微卫星不稳定性和错配修复蛋白缺陷
Am J Surg Pathol. 2008 Jul;32(7):1029-37. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31816380c4.
7
Loci for efficient detection of microsatellite instability in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer.遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌中微卫星不稳定性高效检测的基因座
Oncol Rep. 1999 May-Jun;6(3):497-505. doi: 10.3892/or.6.3.497.
8
Evaluation of the Three Customized MSI Panels to Improve the Detection of Microsatellite Instability in Gastric Cancer.三种定制微卫星不稳定性检测面板用于提高胃癌微卫星不稳定性检测的评估
Clin Lab. 2017 Apr 1;63(4):705-716. doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2016.161029.
9
Detection of microsatellite instability by real time PCR and hybridization probe melting point analysis.通过实时聚合酶链反应和杂交探针熔点分析检测微卫星不稳定性。
Lab Invest. 2001 Oct;81(10):1453-6. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.3780358.
10
Microsatellite instability in Ewing tumor is not associated with loss of mismatch repair protein expression.尤因肉瘤中的微卫星不稳定性与错配修复蛋白表达缺失无关。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2007 Oct;133(10):749-59. doi: 10.1007/s00432-007-0220-2. Epub 2007 May 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Correlations between microsatellite instability and the biological behaviour of tumours.微卫星不稳定性与肿瘤生物学行为的相关性。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2019 Dec;145(12):2891-2899. doi: 10.1007/s00432-019-03053-4. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
2
Mismatch Repair Protein Loss as a Prognostic and Predictive Biomarker in Breast Cancers Regardless of Microsatellite Instability.错配修复蛋白缺失作为乳腺癌的预后和预测生物标志物,无论微卫星稳定性如何。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2018 Dec 13;2(4):pky056. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pky056. eCollection 2018 Oct.
3
Prognostic significance of microsatellite instability‑associated pathways and genes in gastric cancer.微卫星不稳定性相关通路和基因在胃癌中的预后意义。
Int J Mol Med. 2018 Jul;42(1):149-160. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2018.3643. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
4
Screening for Lynch syndrome using risk assessment criteria in patients with ovarian cancer.应用卵巢癌患者风险评估标准进行林奇综合征筛查。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2018 May;29(3):e29. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2018.29.e29. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
5
Mismatch Repair Deficiency and Response to Immune Checkpoint Blockade.错配修复缺陷与免疫检查点阻断反应
Oncologist. 2016 Oct;21(10):1200-1211. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0046. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
6
Somatic microsatellite variability as a predictive marker for colorectal cancer and liver cancer progression.体细胞微卫星变异性作为结直肠癌和肝癌进展的预测标志物。
Oncotarget. 2015 Mar 20;6(8):5760-71. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.3306.
7
Association between IHC and MSI testing to identify mismatch repair-deficient patients with ovarian cancer.免疫组化(IHC)与微卫星不稳定性(MSI)检测之间的关联,用于识别错配修复缺陷型卵巢癌患者。
Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2014 Apr;18(4):229-35. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2013.0393. Epub 2014 Mar 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Personalizing CA125 levels for ovarian cancer screening.针对卵巢癌筛查的 CA125 水平个体化。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2011 Sep;4(9):1356-9. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-11-0378.
2
Frequency of mismatch repair deficiency in ovarian cancer: a systematic review This article is a US Government work and, as such, is in the public domain of the United States of America.卵巢癌中错配修复缺陷的频率:系统评价 本文是美国政府的一项工作,因此属于美利坚合众国的公有领域。
Int J Cancer. 2011 Oct 15;129(8):1914-22. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25835. Epub 2011 Apr 4.
3
Prophylactic and risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy: recommendations based on risk of ovarian cancer.预防性双侧输卵管卵巢切除术:基于卵巢癌风险的建议。
Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Sep;116(3):733-743. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181ec5fc1.
4
Ovarian cancer: an overview.卵巢癌:概述
Am Fam Physician. 2009 Sep 15;80(6):609-16.
5
Ovarian cancer.卵巢癌
Lancet. 2009 Oct 17;374(9698):1371-82. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61338-6. Epub 2009 Sep 28.
6
Cancer statistics, 2009.2009年癌症统计数据。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2009 Jul-Aug;59(4):225-49. doi: 10.3322/caac.20006. Epub 2009 May 27.
7
The cell of origin of ovarian epithelial tumours.卵巢上皮性肿瘤的起源细胞。
Lancet Oncol. 2008 Dec;9(12):1191-7. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70308-5.
8
Confirmation of single exon deletions in MLH1 and MSH2 using quantitative polymerase chain reaction.使用定量聚合酶链反应确认MLH1和MSH2中的单外显子缺失
J Mol Diagn. 2008 Jul;10(4):355-60. doi: 10.2353/jmoldx.2008.080021. Epub 2008 Jun 13.
9
A review of the clinical relevance of mismatch-repair deficiency in ovarian cancer.卵巢癌错配修复缺陷的临床相关性综述。
Cancer. 2008 Aug 15;113(4):733-42. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23601.
10
Targeting poly (ADP) ribose polymerase I (PARP-1) and PARP-1 interacting proteins for cancer treatment.靶向聚(ADP)核糖聚合酶I(PARP-1)及PARP-1相互作用蛋白用于癌症治疗。
Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2008 May;8(4):402-16. doi: 10.2174/187152008784220302.

上皮性卵巢癌女性患者微卫星不稳定性的评估

Evaluation of microsatellite instability in women with epithelial ovarian cancer.

作者信息

Caliman Leonardo Pandolfi, Tavares Rubens Lene Carvalho, Piedade Josiane Barbosa, DE Assis Ana Carolina Silvano Couto, DE Jesus Dias DA Cunha Karen, Braga Letícia DA Conceição, Silva Luciana Maria, DA Silva Filho Agnaldo Lopes

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), 30130-100.

出版信息

Oncol Lett. 2012 Sep;4(3):556-560. doi: 10.3892/ol.2012.776. Epub 2012 Jun 27.

DOI:10.3892/ol.2012.776
PMID:22970055
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3439170/
Abstract

The function of microsatellite instability (MSI) and the optimal panel of markers for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) are not well established. This study aimed to use the National Cancer Institute (NCI) markers BAT25, BAT26, D2S123, D5S346 and D17S250 to evaluate MSI in patients with ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma, compared with ovarian serous cystadenoma and normal ovaries. A total of 37 patients were divided into three groups, as follows: cystadenocarcinoma (n=13), cystadenoma (n=10) and normal ovaries (n=14). DNA was extracted with TRIzol and quantified by spectrophotometry. MSI was evaluated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and classified as high (MSI-H), low (MSI-L) or stable (MSS). FIGO staging was I/II in 23.1% and III/IV in 76.9% of the cystadenocarcinoma group. Polymorphisms were found using at least one marker in 32 women, and were observed with D2S123 (83.7%), D17S250 (81.1%), D5S346 (72.9%), BAT25 (21.6%) and BAT26 (16.2%) markers. In the cystadenocarcinoma group, BAT25, BAT26, D2S123, D5S346 and D17S250 markers were positive in 30.8, 76.9, 53.8, 69.2 and 69.2% of patients, respectively. The same markers were positive in 30, 50, 40, 60 and 30% of the cystadenoma group, and 50, 71.4, 71.4, 64.3 and 63.3% in the normal ovary group, respectively. MSI-H was present in 84.6, 60 and 78.6% of the cystadenocarcinoma, cystadenoma and normal patients, respectively. MSI-L was detected in 0, 30 and 7.1%, and MSS was identified in 15.4, 10 and 14.3% of the cystadenocarcinoma, cystadenoma and normal patients, respectively. The frequency of MSI in both benign epithelial ovarian neoplasms and in normal ovaries was high, as well as in EOC, with no statistically significant difference between the groups. This suggests that MSI may arise as a consequence of the ovulatory process, and not solely as a feature of malignant ovarian tumors.

摘要

微卫星不稳定性(MSI)的功能以及上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)的最佳标志物组合尚未完全明确。本研究旨在使用美国国立癌症研究所(NCI)的标志物BAT25、BAT26、D2S123、D5S346和D17S250来评估卵巢浆液性囊腺癌患者的MSI,并与卵巢浆液性囊腺瘤和正常卵巢进行比较。总共37例患者被分为三组,如下:囊腺癌组(n = 13)、囊腺瘤组(n = 10)和正常卵巢组(n = 14)。用TRIzol提取DNA并通过分光光度法定量。通过聚合酶链反应(PCR)评估MSI,并分为高(MSI-H)、低(MSI-L)或稳定(MSS)。在囊腺癌组中,23.1%为FIGO I/II期,76.9%为III/IV期。在32名女性中使用至少一种标志物发现了多态性,D2S123(83.7%)、D17S250(81.1%)、D5S346(72.9%)、BAT25(21.6%)和BAT26(16.2%)标志物出现多态性。在囊腺癌组中,BAT25、BAT26、D2S123、D5S346和D17S250标志物阳性患者分别为30.8%、76.9%、53.8%、69.2%和69.2%。在囊腺瘤组中,相同标志物阳性患者分别为30%、50%、40%、60%和30%,在正常卵巢组中分别为50%、71.4%、71.4%、64.3%和63.3%。MSI-H分别在84.6%的囊腺癌患者、60%的囊腺瘤患者和78.6%的正常患者中存在。MSI-L在囊腺癌、囊腺瘤和正常患者中的检测率分别为0、30%和7.1%,MSS分别为15.4%、10%和14.3%。良性上皮性卵巢肿瘤和正常卵巢以及EOC中MSI的频率都很高,各组之间无统计学显著差异。这表明MSI可能是排卵过程的结果,而不仅仅是恶性卵巢肿瘤的特征。