MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e44860. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044860. Epub 2012 Sep 10.
Poorer cognitive ability in youth is a risk factor for later mental health problems but it is largely unknown whether cognitive ability, in youth or in later life, is predictive of mental wellbeing. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether cognitive ability at age 11 years, cognitive ability in later life, or lifetime cognitive change are associated with mental wellbeing in older people.
We used data on 8191 men and women aged 50 to 87 years from four cohorts in the HALCyon collaborative research programme into healthy ageing: the Aberdeen Birth Cohort 1936, the Lothian Birth Cohort 1921, the National Child Development Survey, and the MRC National Survey for Health and Development. We used linear regression to examine associations between cognitive ability at age 11, cognitive ability in later life, and lifetime change in cognitive ability and mean score on the Warwick Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale and meta-analysis to obtain an overall estimate of the effect of each.
People whose cognitive ability at age 11 was a standard deviation above the mean scored 0.53 points higher on the mental wellbeing scale (95% confidence interval 0.36, 0.71). The equivalent value for cognitive ability in later life was 0.89 points (0.72, 1.07). A standard deviation improvement in cognitive ability in later life relative to childhood ability was associated with 0.66 points (0.39, 0.93) advantage in wellbeing score. These effect sizes equate to around 0.1 of a standard deviation in mental wellbeing score. Adjustment for potential confounding and mediating variables, primarily the personality trait neuroticism, substantially attenuated these associations.
Associations between cognitive ability in childhood or lifetime cognitive change and mental wellbeing in older people are slight and may be confounded by personality trait differences.
年轻时认知能力较差是日后出现心理健康问题的一个风险因素,但人们尚不清楚是年轻时的认知能力还是晚年的认知能力能够预测心理健康。本研究旨在调查 11 岁时的认知能力、晚年时的认知能力或一生中认知能力的变化是否与老年人的心理健康有关。
我们使用 HALCyon 协作研究计划中四个队列的 8191 名年龄在 50 至 87 岁的男性和女性的数据:阿伯丁出生队列 1936 年、洛锡安出生队列 1921 年、全国儿童发展调查和 MRC 全国健康与发展调查。我们使用线性回归来研究 11 岁时的认知能力、晚年时的认知能力以及一生中认知能力的变化与 Warwick-Edinburgh 心理健康量表平均得分之间的关系,并进行荟萃分析以获得每种关系的总体效应估计。
11 岁时认知能力比平均值高出一个标准差的人在心理健康量表上的得分高出 0.53 分(95%置信区间为 0.36,0.71)。晚年认知能力的等效值为 0.89 分(0.72,1.07)。晚年认知能力相对于儿童时期能力的标准偏差提高与幸福感评分 0.66 分(0.39,0.93)的优势相关。这些效应大小相当于心理健康评分中大约 0.1 的标准偏差。调整潜在的混杂和中介变量,主要是神经质人格特质,大大削弱了这些关联。
儿童时期认知能力或一生中认知能力变化与老年人心理健康之间的关联很小,可能受到人格特质差异的影响。