Suppr超能文献

甲氨基酮戊酸光动力疗法引起的疼痛是否与 5-氨基酮戊酸光动力疗法不同?

Is the pain of topical photodynamic therapy with methyl aminolevulinate any different from that with 5-aminolaevulinic acid?

机构信息

Photobiology Unit, Department of Dermatology, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, Dundee, UK.

出版信息

Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2012 Oct;28(5):272-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0781.2012.00684.x.

Abstract

Topical photodynamic therapy (PDT) using 5-aminolaevulinic acid (ALA) or methyl aminolevulinate (MAL) is widely used in dermatology. It is commonly stated that MAL PDT is less painful than ALA PDT, although published data are conflicting. We report our experience of the use of ALA (4-6 h) (n = 20) and MAL (3 h) (n = 20) in 40 consecutive patients with Bowen's disease or superficial basal cell carcinoma, treated with PDT using an identical irradiation regime. Although there was a trend to higher pain scores with ALA PDT [visual analogue scale (VAS)score, median 4.50], this was not significantly different from that of MAL PDT (VAS score, median 3.55; P = 0.98), nor considered to be clinically important. Importantly, both ALA and MAL PDT regimes were fairly well tolerated in this patient cohort, supporting the use of these prodrugs in dermatological PDT.

摘要

局部光动力疗法(PDT)使用 5-氨基酮戊酸(ALA)或甲基氨基酮戊酸(MAL)在皮肤科中被广泛应用。普遍认为 MAL-PDT 比 ALA-PDT 疼痛程度更低,尽管已发表的数据存在冲突。我们报告了在 40 例连续的 Bowen 病或浅表基底细胞癌患者中使用 ALA(4-6 小时)(n=20)和 MAL(3 小时)(n=20)的经验,这些患者均接受了相同的光疗方案。尽管 ALA-PDT 的疼痛评分较高(视觉模拟评分,中位数 4.50),但与 MAL-PDT 相比无显著差异(VAS 评分,中位数 3.55;P=0.98),也不认为具有临床意义。重要的是,在这个患者队列中,ALA 和 MAL-PDT 方案都得到了较好的耐受,支持将这些前药用于皮肤科 PDT。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验