Suppr超能文献

坐姿与站立式办公桌的热量消耗差异。

Difference in caloric expenditure in sitting versus standing desks.

机构信息

School of Kinesiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

出版信息

J Phys Act Health. 2012 Sep;9(7):1009-11. doi: 10.1123/jpah.9.7.1009.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Traditional desks require students to sit; however, recently schools have provided students with nontraditional standing desks. The purpose of this study was to investigate differences in caloric expenditure of young adults while sitting at a standard classroom desk and standing at a nontraditional standing classroom desk.

METHODS

Twenty (10 male/10 female) young (22.8 ± 1.9 y), healthy participants reported to the laboratory between the hours of 7:00 AM and 2:00 PM following a 12-h fast and 48-h break in exercise. Participants were randomly assigned to perform a series of mathematical problems either sitting at a normal classroom desk or standing at a nontraditional standing desk. Inspired and expired gases were collected for 45-min for the determination of oxygen consumption (VO2), carbon dioxide production (VCO2), and minute ventilation (VE) using a metabolic gas system.

RESULTS

There were significant increases from sitting to standing in VO2 (0.22 ± 0.05 vs. 0.28 ± 0.05 L·min-1, P ≤ .0001), VCO2 (0.18 ± 0.05 vs. 0.24 ± 0.050 L·min-1, P ≤ .0001), VE (7.72 ± 0.67 vs. 9.41 ± 1.20 L·min-1, P ≤ .0001), and kilocalories expended per minute (1.36 ± 0.20 kcal/min, P ≤ .0001 vs. 1.02 ± 0.22 kcal/min, P ≤ .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Results indicate a significant increase in caloric expenditure in subjects that were standing at a standing classroom desk compared with sitting at a standard classroom desk.

摘要

背景

传统的桌子需要学生坐着;然而,最近学校为学生提供了非传统的站立式桌子。本研究的目的是调查年轻人坐在标准教室课桌和站在非传统站立式教室课桌时的热量消耗差异。

方法

20 名(10 名男性/10 名女性)年轻(22.8±1.9 岁)、健康的参与者在禁食 12 小时和停止运动 48 小时后,于上午 7:00 至下午 2:00 之间到实验室报到。参与者被随机分配到标准教室桌前坐或非传统站立式书桌前站,以完成一系列数学问题。使用代谢气体系统收集 45 分钟的吸气和呼气,以确定耗氧量(VO2)、二氧化碳产生量(VCO2)和分钟通气量(VE)。

结果

从坐姿到站姿,VO2(0.22±0.05 与 0.28±0.05 L·min-1,P≤.0001)、VCO2(0.18±0.05 与 0.24±0.050 L·min-1,P≤.0001)、VE(7.72±0.67 与 9.41±1.20 L·min-1,P≤.0001)和每分钟消耗的热量(1.36±0.20 kcal/min,P≤.0001 与 1.02±0.22 kcal/min,P≤.0001)均显著增加。

结论

结果表明,与坐在标准教室课桌相比,站在站立式教室课桌的受试者热量消耗明显增加。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验