• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

可调节高度办公桌:能量消耗、对坐立姿势的喜好及偏好

Height-Adjustable Desks: Energy Expenditure, Liking, and Preference of Sitting and Standing.

作者信息

Roemmich James N

出版信息

J Phys Act Health. 2016 Oct;13(10):1094-1099. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2015-0397. Epub 2016 Aug 16.

DOI:10.1123/jpah.2015-0397
PMID:27256708
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Breaking periods of sitting with standing may prevent chronic diseases and increase energy expenditure (EE). Sit-to-stand height adjustable desks may promote workplace standing, but workers have to be willing to stand for portions of the workday.

METHODS

For studies 1 and 2, EE was measured during word processing while sitting in a chair and while standing. Subjects scored their liking of each posture and time they would be willing to work in each posture during an 8-hour workday. Study 2 included an intervention of replacing subjects' sitting desks with a height adjustable desk. Liking of and willingness to work in each posture were measured before and after the 12-month intervention.

RESULTS

EE was 7.5 kcal/h greater when standing than when sitting. Subjects liked sitting more than standing in study 1. In study 2, liking of postures did not differ or change across 12 months use of height adjustable desks. Perceived willingness to stand decreased from 4.5 h/d at baseline to 3.4 h/d after 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Standing rather than sitting increased EE by 7.5 kcal/h. Use of a height adjustable desk for 12 months did not alter the hedonic value of standing or sitting, which is promising for long-term increases in standing.

摘要

背景

间断性地从坐姿转换为站姿可预防慢性疾病并增加能量消耗(EE)。坐站两用的高度可调节办公桌或许能促进在工作场所站立,但员工必须愿意在工作日的部分时间里站立。

方法

在研究1和研究2中,测量了受试者在使用文字处理软件时坐着和站着的能量消耗。受试者对每种姿势的喜好程度以及他们在8小时工作日中愿意以每种姿势工作的时间进行了评分。研究2包括一项干预措施,即把受试者的固定高度办公桌换成高度可调节办公桌。在为期12个月的干预前后,测量了受试者对每种姿势的喜好程度以及愿意以每种姿势工作的意愿。

结果

站立时的能量消耗比坐着时每小时高7.5千卡。在研究1中,受试者更喜欢坐着而非站立。在研究2中,使用高度可调节办公桌12个月后,对姿势的喜好程度没有差异或变化。自我感觉的站立意愿从基线时的每天4.5小时降至12个月后的每天3.4小时。

结论

站立而非坐着可使能量消耗每小时增加7.5千卡。使用高度可调节办公桌12个月并未改变站立或坐着的享乐价值,这对于长期增加站立时间来说是有前景的。

相似文献

1
Height-Adjustable Desks: Energy Expenditure, Liking, and Preference of Sitting and Standing.可调节高度办公桌:能量消耗、对坐立姿势的喜好及偏好
J Phys Act Health. 2016 Oct;13(10):1094-1099. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2015-0397. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
2
"Thinking on your feet": A qualitative evaluation of sit-stand desks in an Australian workplace.“随机应变”:对澳大利亚一个工作场所的升降桌的定性评估
BMC Public Health. 2013 Apr 18;13:365. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-365.
3
Increasing passive energy expenditure during clerical work.增加文书工作期间的被动能量消耗。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2008 Jun;103(3):353-60. doi: 10.1007/s00421-008-0713-y. Epub 2008 Mar 20.
4
Cross-sectional Examination of Long-term Access to Sit-Stand Desks in a Professional Office Setting.专业办公环境中使用坐站两用办公桌的长期可及性横断面调查。
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Jan;50(1):96-100. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.07.013. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
5
Who uses height-adjustable desks? - Sociodemographic, health-related, and psycho-social variables of regular users.谁使用可调节高度办公桌?——经常使用者的社会人口统计学、健康相关及心理社会变量
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Mar 6;14(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0480-4.
6
Impact of an 8-Month Trial Using Height-Adjustable Desks on Children's Classroom Sitting Patterns and Markers of Cardio-Metabolic and Musculoskeletal Health.一项为期8个月的使用可调节高度课桌的试验对儿童课堂坐姿以及心血管代谢和肌肉骨骼健康指标的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Dec 10;13(12):1227. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13121227.
7
Sit-stand desks in call centres: associations of use and ergonomics awareness with sedentary behavior.呼叫中心的坐立两用办公桌:使用情况与人体工程学意识与久坐行为的关联。
Appl Ergon. 2013 Jul;44(4):517-22. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2012.11.001. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
8
Energy Expenditure During Acute Periods of Sitting, Standing, and Walking.坐姿、站姿和行走急性期的能量消耗。
J Phys Act Health. 2016 Jun;13(6):573-8. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2015-0419. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
9
Effect of a novel two-desk sit-to-stand workplace (ACTIVE OFFICE) on sitting time, performance and physiological parameters: protocol for a randomized control trial.新型双桌式坐站两用工作场所(ACTIVE OFFICE)对久坐时间、工作表现和生理参数的影响:一项随机对照试验方案
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jul 15;16:578. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3271-y.
10
A systematic review of standing and treadmill desks in the workplace.对工作场所站立式和跑步机式办公桌的系统评价。
Prev Med. 2015 Jan;70:50-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.11.011. Epub 2014 Nov 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the Psychological Effects and Physical Exertion of Using Different Movement Interactions in Casual Exergames That Promote Active Microbreaks: Quasi-Experimental Study.探索促进积极微休息的休闲健身游戏中使用不同运动交互的心理效应和体力消耗:准实验研究。
JMIR Serious Games. 2024 Aug 26;12:e55905. doi: 10.2196/55905.
2
Can Physical Activity While Sedentary Produce Health Benefits? A Single-Arm Randomized Trial.久坐时进行体育活动能产生健康益处吗?一项单臂随机试验。
Sports Med Open. 2020 Oct 2;6(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s40798-020-00278-3.
3
Stand Up, Students! Decisional Cues Reduce Sedentary Behavior in University Students.
站起来,同学们!决策提示可减少大学生的久坐行为。
Front Public Health. 2019 Aug 20;7:230. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00230. eCollection 2019.
4
Moving to an "Active" Biophilic Designed Office Workplace: A Pilot Study about the Effects on Sitting Time and Sitting Habits of Office-Based Workers.从“被动式”办公环境到“主动式”亲生物设计办公环境的转变:一项关于办公人群久坐时间和久坐习惯的影响的试点研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 May 4;16(9):1559. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16091559.
5
Self-reported actual and desired proportion of sitting, standing, walking and physically demanding tasks of office employees in the workplace setting: do they fit together?职场环境中办公室员工自我报告的坐、站、行走及体力要求较高任务的实际和期望比例:它们相符吗?
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Nov 17;10(1):504. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2829-9.