Ashley Paul F, Parekh Susan, Moles David R, Anand Prabhleen, Behbehani Amal
Unit of Paediatric Dentistry, UCL Eastman Dental Institute, London, UK.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12(9):CD008392. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008392.pub2.
Fear of dental pain is a major barrier to children needing dental care. The use of preoperative analgesics has the potential to reduce postoperative discomfort. In addition it might also reduce intraoperative pain. Reviewing the available evidence will determine whether further research is warranted and will inform the development of prescribing guidelines.
To assess the effects of preoperative analgesics for pain relief in children and adolescents undergoing dental treatment.
We searched the following electronic databases: the Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register (to 8 March 2012), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 1), MEDLINE via OVID (1950 to 8 March 2012), EMBASE via OVID (1980 to 8 March 2012), LILACS via BIREME (1982 to 8 March 2012) and the ISI Web of Knowledge (1945 to 8 March 2012). There were no restrictions regarding language or date of publication.The reference lists of all eligible trials were checked for additional studies. Specialists in the field were contacted for any unpublished data.
Randomised controlled clinical trials of analgesics given before dental treatment versus placebo or no analgesics in children and adolescents aged up to 17 years. We excluded children and adolescents having dental treatment under sedation (including nitrous oxide/oxygen) or general anaesthesia.
Two review authors assessed titles and abstracts for eligibility and undertook data extraction and assessment of risk of bias.
Five trials met the review's inclusion criteria with 190 participants in total. Three trials were dentally related i.e. restorative and extraction treatments; two trials related to orthodontic treatment. None of the included trials were judged to be at low risk of bias. Three trials compared paracetamol with placebo, only two of which provided data for analysis (presence or absence of parent-reported postoperative pain behaviour). The meta-analysis of the two trials showed a nonsignificant risk ratio (RR) for postoperative pain-related behaviours of 0.81 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53 to 1.22; P = 0.31), which showed no evidence of a benefit in taking paracetamol preoperatively (52% reporting pain in placebo versus 42% in test group). One of these trials was at unclear risk of bias, the other at high risk. Four trials compared ibuprofen with placebo. Three of these trials provided useable data. One trial reported no statistical difference in postoperative pain experienced by the ibuprofen group and the control group for children undergoing dental treatment. Data from two trials, including patients who were having orthodontic separator replacement without a general anaesthetic, were pooled to determine the effect of preoperative ibuprofen on the severity of postoperative pain. There was a statistically significant benefit, with regard to severity of postoperative pain, for giving ibuprofen preoperatively with mean difference -19.12 (95% CI -29.36 to -8.87; P = 0.0003; moderate quality evidence) on a visual analogue scale (0 to 100) indicating a probable benefit for preoperative ibuprofen before this orthodontic procedure. However, both these trials were at high risk of bias. Adverse events were only reported in one trial (one patient from the ibuprofen group and one from the placebo group reporting a lip or cheek biting injury).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: From the available evidence we cannot determine whether or not preoperative analgesics are of benefit in paediatric dentistry for procedures under local anaesthetic. There is probably a benefit in prescribing preoperative analgesics prior to orthodontic separator placement.
对牙科疼痛的恐惧是儿童接受牙科护理的主要障碍。术前使用镇痛药有可能减轻术后不适。此外,它还可能减轻术中疼痛。回顾现有证据将确定是否有必要进行进一步研究,并为制定处方指南提供依据。
评估术前镇痛药对接受牙科治疗的儿童和青少年缓解疼痛的效果。
我们检索了以下电子数据库:Cochrane口腔健康组试验注册库(截至2012年3月8日)、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)(《Cochrane图书馆》2012年第1期)、通过OVID检索的MEDLINE(1950年至2012年3月8日)、通过OVID检索的EMBASE(1980年至2012年3月8日)、通过BIREME检索的LILACS(1982年至2012年3月8日)以及ISI科学网(1945年至2012年3月8日)。对语言或出版日期没有限制。检查了所有符合条件试验的参考文献列表以查找其他研究。联系了该领域的专家以获取任何未发表的数据。
对17岁及以下儿童和青少年在牙科治疗前给予镇痛药与安慰剂或不使用镇痛药的随机对照临床试验。我们排除了在镇静(包括氧化亚氮/氧气)或全身麻醉下接受牙科治疗的儿童和青少年。
两位综述作者评估标题和摘要以确定是否符合入选标准,并进行数据提取和偏倚风险评估。
五项试验符合综述的纳入标准,共有190名参与者。三项试验与牙科相关,即修复和拔牙治疗;两项试验与正畸治疗相关。纳入的试验均未被判定为低偏倚风险。三项试验将对乙酰氨基酚与安慰剂进行了比较,其中只有两项提供了分析数据(家长报告的术后疼痛行为的有无)。这两项试验的荟萃分析显示,术后疼痛相关行为的风险比(RR)无统计学意义,为0.81(95%置信区间(CI)0.53至1.22;P = 0.31),这表明术前服用对乙酰氨基酚没有益处(安慰剂组52%报告疼痛,试验组42%)。其中一项试验的偏倚风险不明确,另一项为高风险。四项试验将布洛芬与安慰剂进行了比较。其中三项试验提供了可用数据。一项试验报告称,接受牙科治疗的儿童中,布洛芬组和对照组术后疼痛无统计学差异。汇总两项试验(包括在未进行全身麻醉的情况下更换正畸分离器的患者)的数据,以确定术前布洛芬对术后疼痛严重程度的影响。在视觉模拟量表(0至100)上,术前给予布洛芬在术后疼痛严重程度方面有统计学意义的益处,平均差值为-19.12(95%CI -29.至-8.87;P = = 0.0003;中等质量证据),表明在该正畸手术前术前使用布洛芬可能有益。然而,这两项试验均为高偏倚风险。仅在一项试验中报告了不良事件(布洛芬组一名患者和安慰剂组一名患者报告唇部或颊部咬伤)。
根据现有证据,我们无法确定术前镇痛药在儿童牙科局部麻醉手术中是否有益。在放置正畸分离器之前开具术前镇痛药可能有益。